Judges 'Consideration in the Decision of Fulfilling the Rights of Women and Children After Divorce in the Region of the DKI Jakarta High Religious Court


Abdurrahman Rahim(1*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The background of this research is related to the most basic issues and has become the discourse among legal practitioners and academics so far, regarding how the rights of women and children that have been imposed by judges through their decisions can be implemented properly by ex-husbands voluntarily. In reality, in practice, many judges' decisions relating to women's rights are not carried out by ex-husbands. In addition, there is no mechanism that is able to ensure the payment of child and / or financial support by the defendant after divorce, ex-husbands are often absent from their obligations to pay for the rights of ex-wives and children after divorce. The results of this study indicate that: The position of guarantee for the rights of women and children after divorce is very weak, therefore the issue of living for wives who have been divorced by husbands and children still does not fully provide legal protection to wives. Judges' considerations in the decision of the Religious Court in the DKI Jakarta High Religious Court area in providing the rights of women and children in their development have attempted to provide protection in the form of charging fees as a result of divorce submitted by husbands to the Religious Court in the form of iddah, mut'ah, and livelihoods. children, common property

Keywords


Religious Court, divorce, iddah, mut’ah, children, property.

Full Text:

PDF

References


BIP, T. (2017). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Black, D. (1976). Behavior of Law. New York, San Fransisco, Academic Press.

Harahap, M. Y. (1990). Kedudukan, kewenangan, dan acara peradilan agama: UU no. 7 tahun 1989. Pustaka Kartini.

Kasdi, A. (2014). Maqasiid Syari’ah Prespektif Pemikiran Imam Syatibi Dalam Kitab Al-Muwaffiq. Yudisia, 05(01).

Kompilasi hukum Islam. (2004). Pustaka Widyatama.

Lubis, S. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Kencana.

Mardani, D. (2016). Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Kencana.

Praja, J. S. (1993). Filsafat Hukum Islam. Yayasan Piara Pengembangan Agama dan Humaniora.

Ratnapala, S. (2009). Jurispridence. Cambridge University Press.

Sholeh, A., Gumelar, D. R., & Fuaah, A. T. (2019). Pendampingan Hak-Hak Perempuan. JCIC – Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial.

Syafe’i, R. (1999). Yurisprudensi Peradilan Agama dari Pelaksanaan UUPA: Segi Normatif dalam Kajian Fiqh, Alternatif Penyempurnaan Timbal Balik, dalam 10 Tahun Undang-undang Peradilan Agama. Ditbinbapera dan Fakultas Hukum UI.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12413

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

International Journal of Nusantara Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License