Ex-Officio Rights of the Judges in Signating the Holder of Currency: Hadhanah in Directions of Divorce at the Religious Court as an Efforts of Legal Protection and Administration of Legal Certainity for Children

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 15, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v7i2.12419
Keywords:
Children, Hadhanah, Divorce, Protection, Parents.

Main Article Content

Muhammad Fadhly Ase
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Abstract

Child custody (hadhanah) is a problem that often occurs in divorce. This is because divorce often still leaves problems. Divorce only breaks the legal relationship between husband and wife and changes the status of each to a former husband and ex-wife but does not reduce conflicts between them. The conflict between the parents which then leads to a struggle for custody of the child clearly greatly affects the psychological condition of the child. It is the duty of a judge to provide the best interests as a form of protection for the child. The results of this study indicate: the right of ex officio judges is used or applied in the context of certainty, justice and legal benefits for both parties and especially for the child himself, hadhanah or post-divorce care for the child places the child's position as a party that must be protected and is a joint obligation of both parents. in the best interest of the child.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Section
Articles

International Journal of Nusantara Islam uses the license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to compose, repair, and make derivative creations even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit and proper acknowledgment of the original publication from International Journal of Nusantara Islam is made to allow users to trace back to the original manuscript and author. Readers are also granted full access to read and download the published manuscripts, reprint, and distribute the manuscript in any medium or format.

References

Abbas, A. S. (2004). Qawa’id Fiqhiyyah. Pedoman Ilmu Jaya.

Ad-Daruquthni, I. A.-H. A. B. U. (2008). Sunan Ad-Daruquthni. Pustaka Azam.

Al-Jauziyah, I. Q. (2006). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah fi al-Siyasah al- Syar’iyyah—Hukum Acara peradilan Islam (A. Qihar, Trans.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Arifin, Z., & Anshori, Muh. (2019). Fiqih Munakahat. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bahri, S. (2008). Metodologi Hukum Islam. Teras.

BIP, T. (2017). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Harahap, M. Y. (1990). Kedudukan, kewenangan, dan acara peradilan agama: UU no. 7 tahun 1989. Pustaka Kartini.

Kemenag. (2016). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Kompilasi hukum Islam. (2004). Pustaka Widyatama.

Manan, A., & Kencana. (2016). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama Ed. 2.

Marzuki, P. (2020). Teori hukum. Prenada Media.

Mas’ud, I. (2007). Fiqh Madzhab Syafi’i. Pustaka Setia.

Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, S. (1998). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.

Mughniyah, M. J. (2015). Fiqih Lima Mazhab: Ja’fari, Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi’i, Hambali. Shaf.

Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Mandar Maju.

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatn Dalam Putusan Hakim Diperadilan Perdata. Jurnal DInamika Hukum, 12(3).