The Dilemma of Religious Tolerance: Levinasian Critique and Proposal

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 23, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v11i2.31226
Keywords:
Emmanuel Levinas, Ethical subject, Pluralistic society, Religious tolerance

Main Article Content

Radea Yuli. A Hambali
(Scopus ID: 57223046637) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

Religious tolerance is a critical issue in pluralistic societies such as Indonesia. Without tolerance, the expressions of beliefs can lead to fanaticism, conflict, and hostility that negatively impact social security and stability. This article addresses the dilemma of religious tolerance by exploring and connecting the concept of “the Other†in Emmanuel Levinas’ thought as an ethical subject who requires protection and respect for the individual with the discussion of tolerance indicators in the context of religious moderation. This qualitative study employs a literature review method, with data collected through literature review and analyzed descriptively using Emmanuel Levinas’ philosophical perspective. The results indicate that religious tolerance in the framework of religious moderation, as found in Emmanuel Levinas’ thought, entails the recognition and respect for the identity of the “Otherâ€. The “Other†is an ethical subject with the right to live free from discrimination and oppression. In the framework of tolerance, the “Other†is not merely allowed to exist and differ but necessitates the growth of respect and appreciation through fair and respectful treatment of those who are different. From Levinas’s viewpoint, the practice of religious tolerance must be carried out by considering the concept of ethical relationships between individuals and “The Other.†Religious tolerance manifests ethical responsibility to recognize and respect the existence of others with different religions and beliefs. This article proposes that Levinasian philosophy can provide a useful critique and proposal for the dilemma of religious tolerance in pluralistic societies

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Section
Articles

International Journal of Nusantara Islam uses the license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to compose, repair, and make derivative creations even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit and proper acknowledgment of the original publication from International Journal of Nusantara Islam is made to allow users to trace back to the original manuscript and author. Readers are also granted full access to read and download the published manuscripts, reprint, and distribute the manuscript in any medium or format.

References

Bajrami, D., & Demiri, B. (2019). Ethical relativism and morality. ILIRIA International Review, 9(1), 2019, 221-229.

Courtis, M. (2018). Issues Concerning Religious Tolerance and Diversity. Portland Community College.

Ernaningrum, N. (2022). Diversity in Unity: An Analysis of Multicultural and Multi-Religious in a Biblical Gender Perspective. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (IJHESS), 1(6), 882-891.

George, S. K. (2009). Hospitality as openness to the other: Levinas, Derrida and the Indian hospitality ethos. Journal of Human Values, 15(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580901500103

Insel, A. (2019). Tolerated but not equal. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45(4), 511–515.

Lammer-Heindel, C. S. (2013). Cultural Relativism and the Principle of Tolerance: A Response to Park. Loras College, Division of Philosophy, Religion and Theology, 1-8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23803.59682

Levinas, E. (1987). Time and the Other. Translated by Richard A. Cohen. Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (2012). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Springer Science & Business Media.

MacDonald, M. N., & O’Regan, J. P. (2013). The ethics of intercultural communication. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(10), 1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00833.x

Manoppo, F. K., Janis, Y., & Wuwung, O. (2019). Tolerance Education for Early Childhood in Industry 4.0. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aicosh-19.2019.64

Ministry of Religion. (2019). Religious Moderation. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.

O’Connor, A. (2017). An Analysis of Gordon W. Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice. The Macat Library.

Oltvai, K. (2021). E. Nerlson, Levinas, Adorno, and the ethics of the material other. Phenomenological Reviews, 7, 57. https://doi.org/10.19079/pr.7.57

Petrov, G. D., & Croitoru, M. M. (2022). Religious diversity and pluralism. Inter-religious relations in globalization. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 34(1), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v34i1.7154

Setara Institute. (2022). Mengatasi Intoleransi, Merangkul Keberagaman, Kondisi Kebebasan Beragama/Berkeyakinan (KBB) di Indonesia Tahun 2021. Pustaka Masyarakat Setara.

Sikka, S. (1999). How not to read the other: all the rest can be translated. Philosophy Today, 43, 195.

Skalski, J. E. (2017). The historical evolution of tolerance, the experience of tolerating, and the face of the other. Humanistic Psychologist, 45(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000050

Verkuyten, M., & Kollar, R. (2021). Tolerance and intolerance: Cultural meanings and discursive usage. Culture & Psychology, 27(1), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20984356

Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2016). The social psychology of intergroup toleration: a roadmap for theory and research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 1-11.