Reframing scarcity through social thermodynamics and Islamic ethics: An interdisciplinary conceptual approach

Main Article Content

Tatang Sujata

Abstract

This metatheoretical study emerges from a critical reassessment of classical economic thought, which reduces scarcity to a mere technical issue of limited resources against unlimited wants—neglecting its deeper social, ecological, and ethical dimensions. In the face of accelerating global crises marked by structural inequality, institutional decay, and environmental degradation, scarcity is better understood as a manifestation of rising social entropy—a systemic disintegration triggered by the depletion of social energy such as trust, participation, and moral legitimacy. This research aims to reframe scarcity through an interdisciplinary synthesis of social entropy theory (Bailey), social thermodynamics modeling (Tsekov), and foundational Islamic ethical principles including ‘adl (justice), amanah (trust), and mīzān (cosmic balance). Using a conceptual literature review, this study develops a theoretical framework that positions ethical and spiritual values as vital forms of social energy capable of counteracting entropy and sustaining systemic equilibrium. The findings reveal that scarcity is not simply a material deficiency but a multidimensional crisis demanding a transformative response—one rooted not only in technical rationality but also in spiritual wisdom, distributive justice, and collective moral responsibility. The study contributes a novel conceptual model that bridges physical social science with Islamic moral epistemology, offering a holistic lens for understanding scarcity while informing equitable public policy, institutional reform, and sustainable social design.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ahmed, H. (2022). Islamic Capital: Ethical Foundations Of An Equitable Economic System. Durham University Business School. Durham University Business School.

Al Amin, Z. (2024). Pancasila and Maqashid Sharia: Philosophical Perspectives on Value Harmony. Journal of Iuridica Pancasila, 1(2), 67–78.

Ali, Z., Anjum, G. M., Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, I. (2024). The Role of Islamic Values in Promoting Social Justice and Community Welfare. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(1), 575–585.

Ananta, A., Arifin, E. N., & Suryadinata, L. (2021). Pancasila Indonesia dan kewarganegaraan multikultural. Institut ISEAS-Yusof Ishak.

Arifin, F., Tedjabuwana, R., Wiyono, S., & Abdullah, M. K. bin. (2025). Indonesia’s identity politics and populism: Disruption to national cohesion. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 22(1), 166–175.

Baciu, D. C. (2024). Causal Modeling and Thermodynamics: Towards a new convergence of the two fields. BioSystems, 246, 105338.

Bailey, J. (2025). Social theory for planning. Taylor & Francis.

Bailey, K. D. (1990). Social entropy theory. State University of New York Press.

Basheer, N., Ahmed, V., Bahroun, Z., & Anane, C. (2025). Sustainability assessment in higher education institutions: exploring indicators, stakeholder perceptions, and implementation challenges. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 1–25.

Bejan, A. (2019). Freedom and evolution: hierarchy in nature, society and science. Springer Nature.

Beretta, G. P. (2020). The fourth law of thermodynamics: steepest entropy ascent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2170), 20190168.

Blocker, C., Zhang, J. Z., Hill, R. P., Roux, C., Corus, C., Hutton, M., Dorsey, J., & Minton, E. (2023). Rethinking scarcity and poverty: Building bridges for shared insight and impact. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 489–509.

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being “systematic” in literature reviews BT - Formulating research methods for information systems (pp. 161–173). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137552392_9

Booshehri, M., Emele, L., Flügel, S., Förster, H., Frey, J., Frey, U., Glauer, M., Hastings, J., Hofmann, C., & Hoyer-Klick, C. (2021). Introducing the Open Energy Ontology: Enhancing data interpretation and interfacing in energy systems analysis. Energy and AI, 5, 100074.

Bortis, H. (2023). Classical-Keynesian political economy, not Neoclassical economics, is the economic theory of the future. Review of Political Economy, 35(1), 65–97.

Bucelli, I., & Mcknight, A. (2021). Mapping systemic approaches to understanding inequality and their potential for designing and implementing interventions to reduce inequality.

Bucos, T. (2024). Social and solidarity economy: principles and contributions to sustainable development and social inclusion. European Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 114–127.

Carrillo, F. J. (2025). Degrowth through Knowledge-Based Development: Social Flourishing in the Anthropocene. Taylor & Francis.

Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 591–646. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591

Cevallos, C. (2024). Building Adaptive Capacity in Christian Higher Education: An Autoethnography Analysis from a Hispanic/Latino Perspective. Biola University.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.