Theoretical and Practical Implications of Evidence in Religion Court

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i1.8538
Keywords:
evidence, Religion Court, Court's decision,

Main Article Content

Muhiddin Muhiddin
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

In the civil procedural law, the certainty of the truth of the events proposed at the trial depends very much on the evidence carried out by the parties concerned. As a consequence, the truth is said to exist or be reached if there is a match between the judge's conclusion (the result of the process) and the events that have taken place. Whereas if the opposite happens, it means that the truth is not reached. Research conducted by the author is research based on document research (Library Research), meaning that the data that are used as a reference in this study are facts in the field that have been documented in the Court's decision. The results of this study indicate that the contribution of evidence in court is very necessary, because one of the duties of the judge is to investigate whether there is a legal relationship on which the lawsuit really exists or not. The existence of this legal relationship must be proven by the parties in court.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Section
Articles

International Journal of Nusantara Islam uses the license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works. This license permits anyone to compose, repair, and make derivative creations even for commercial purposes, as long as appropriate credit and proper acknowledgment of the original publication from International Journal of Nusantara Islam is made to allow users to trace back to the original manuscript and author. Readers are also granted full access to read and download the published manuscripts, reprint, and distribute the manuscript in any medium or format.

Author Biography

Muhiddin Muhiddin, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Doctoral Student of Islamic Law Study Program Concentration on Family Law

References

A. Rasyid, R. (2010). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Arto, M. (2017). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama (IX). Pustaka Pelajar.

Athoillah, M. A., & Sofyan Al-Hakim, S. (2013). Reinterpreting the Ratio legis of the Prohibition of Usury. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(10), 1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.10.2187

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brimer, J. A., & Smith-Porter, L. (2004). Annual Franchise and Distribution Law Developments, 2004. ABA Forum on Franchising.

Burton, M. (2013). Doing Empirical Research: Exploring the Decission Making of Magistrates and Juries. In M. Burton & D. E. Watkins (Eds.), Research methods in law. Hoboken : Taylor & Francis : Routledge.

Castillo de la Torre, F., & Gippini Fournier, E. (2017). Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in Eu Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Coleman, J. L. (1999). The Practice of Principle (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 186308). Social Science Research Network.

Curtis, A. R. (2005). Using Electronic Databases in Quantitative and Qualitative research. In G. R. Taylor (Ed.), Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Research. University Press of America.

Djalil, A. B. (2006). Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Dobinson, I., & Johns, F. (2007). Qualitative Legal Research. In M. McConville & W. H. Chui (Eds.), Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh Univ. Press.

Dobinson, I., & Johns, F. (2017). Legal Research as Qualitative research. In M. McConville & W. H. Chui (Eds.), Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh University Press.

Domiri. (2016). Analisis tentang Sistem Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 47 No. 3.

Goldman, A. I. (2008). Legal Evidence. In M. P. Golding & W. A. Edmundson (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. John Wiley & Sons.

Harahap, M. Y. (2001). Kedudukan Kewenangan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Sinar Grafika.

Hess, G. F. (2014). Qualitative Research on Legal Education: Studying Outstanding Law Teachers. Alberta Law Review, 51(4), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr45

Ho, H. L. (2008). A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth. Oxford University Press.

Hukum Acara Pidana:Surat-surat Resmi di Pengadilan oleh Advocat. (2005). Djambatan.

Manan, A. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama (III). Prenada Media.

Manan, B. (2007). Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. PT. Alumni.

Mardani. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.

McDowell, S. (2017). Evidence That Demands a Verdict: Life-Changing Truth for a Skeptical World. Thomas Nelson Publishers.

McIntyre, J. (2019). The Judicial Function: Fundamental Principles of Contemporary Judging.

Mertokusumo, S. (1995). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Muhamamd, S. K. (2014). Uwaidah, Fikih Wanita. Pustaka al-Kautsar.

Rasyid, F. A., & Dulkiah, M. (2020). Political Will Government in Prevention of Post-Reform Corruption in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5304–5313. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201628

Sage, C., Wright, T., Morris, C., & Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales. (2002). Case Management Reform: A Study of the Federal Court’s Individual Docket System. Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.

Soeikromo, D. (2016). Proses Pembuktian Dan Penggunaan Alat Bukti pada Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Jurnal, Vol. II No. 1.

Sunge, M. (2012). Beban Pembuktian dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Inovasi, Vol. 9 No. 2.

Walker, M. U. (2003). Moral Contexts. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.