Rethinking the Religious Turn in International Development and Global Governance: A Critical Review of Gerard Clarke

Rethinking the Religious Turn in International Development and Global Governance: A Critical Review of Gerard Clarke

Authors

  • Neirna Yayah Daryati UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Mohammad Taufiq Rahman UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Asep Abdul Sahid UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i3.55450

Keywords:

global governance, international development, Post-Secularism, religious turn

Abstract

Since the post-World War II era, international development has been dominated by a modernization paradigm grounded in secular rationality, positioning it as a technocratic, growth-oriented project that neglects the religious dimension. However, global dynamics indicate a revitalization of religion in the public sphere (deprivatization), which has triggered a post-secular turn and demands the integration of religious values into development. Religion, in the context of the Global South, has proven to be an important framework for understanding poverty and social practices, as well as a source of legitimacy and moral capital. This article critically examines Gerard Clarke's work "Religion and International Development" using a critical literature review approach that combines theories of secularization, post-secularism, and capability approaches. The findings indicate that religious integration reconfigures understandings of development actors and global governance through the strategic role of faith-based organizations. However, this engagement also carries the risk of exclusion and the politicization of identity. This article argues that the religious turn reflects an epistemological shift toward a post-secular development paradigm, where religion is understood as part of normative negotiations in global governance. Therefore, an inclusive, contextually grounded interdisciplinary approach is needed to manage the relationships among religion, the state, and the market in contemporary global development.

References

Appleby, R. S. (2001). The ambivalence of the sacred. THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 62(1), 193–194.

Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.

Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., Williams, J. M., Bizup, J., & Fitzgerald, W. T. (2008). The craft of research. Chicago. USA: University of Chicago Press.

Burhani, A. N. (2016). Muhammadiyah Berkemajuan: Pergeseran dari puritanisme ke kosmopolitanisme [Progressive Muhammadiyah: Shift from puritanism to cosmopolitanism]. https://doi.org/[in Indonesian]

Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago press.

Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective (Vol. 21). Kube Publishing Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davie, G., Berger, P. L., Rapids, G., & Eerdmans, M. I. (1999). The Desecularization of the world. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.

Effendy, B. (1998). Islam dan negara: Transformasi pemikiran dan praktik politik Islam di Indonesia [Islam and the state: The transformation of Islamic political thought and practice in Indonesia]. https://doi.org/[in Indonesian]

Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.

Esposito, J. L. (2003). Unholy war: Terror in the name of Islam. Oxford University Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. new York: Pantheon. FoucaultPower/Knowledge1980.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method, (London & New York, Continuum). 2004.

Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post‐secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29.

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination.

Haynes, J. (2007). Religion and development: Conflict or cooperation? Springer.

Kuntowijoyo, I. S. I. (2001). Muslim Tanpa Masjid: Esai-Esai Agama [Muslims Without Mosques: Religious Essays]. Budaya, Dan Politik Dalam Bingkai Strukturalisme Transendental (Bandung: Mizan, 2001). https://doi.org/[in Indonesian]

Latief, H. (2013). Islamic Philanthropy and Social Development in Contemporary Indonesia. London: Routledge.

Marshall, K., & Keough, L. (2004). Mind, heart and soul in the fight against poverty. World Bank Publications-Books.

Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the poor. Can anyone hear us?

Neuman, L. W. (2007). Social research methods, 6/E. Pearson Education India.

Nussbaum, M. C., & Capabilities, C. (2011). The human development approach. Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard, 87.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University.

Sen, A. (1999). Freedom. Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard university press.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-09
Loading...