Gender Bias and Religious Conservatism in Indonesia: An Analysis of the Shuniyya Ruhama Case on Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v5i4.48335Kata Kunci:
gender bias, critical discourse analysis, religious conservatism, social media, gender representationAbstrak
This study analyzes how gender bias and religious conservatism are reproduced through social media in Indonesia, using the viral case study of Shuniyya Ruhama, a female religious teacher who was attacked online for expressing religious views that were considered incompatible with conservative interpretations. The objective of this study is to uncover the dynamics of the representation of female religious authority and resistance to it in the digital space. The methodology employed is Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), utilizing data from the platforms X (Twitter), Threads, and TikTok, using a purposive sampling technique. Findings indicate that women who deliver religious sermons often face delegitimization through misogynistic religious narratives that reinforce the hegemony of religious patriarchy. Symbolic representations in the form of labeling, hate speech, and the removal of women’s religious authority status reveal unequal power dynamics. On the other hand, counter-narratives emerge from progressive communities advocating for equality in religious interpretation and women’s religious authority. This study shows that social media is not neutral, but rather an ideological arena where conservative discourse is both perpetuated and challenged. The implications of this study include the need for a reformulation of gender-fair media representation and support for digital public spaces that are inclusive of women in religious discourse.
Referensi
Aguilar Contreras, M. (2024). Epistemology of Bodies as Closets: Queer Theologies and the Resurrection of Martyrized Christo-Morphic Bodies. Religions, 15(4), 456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040456
Brady, R. H. (2024). “Guard Your Virtue with Your Life”: Purity Expectations and Dynamics of Purity and Gender-Based Violence for Latter-day Saint (LDS) Girls and Women. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7936/rhb6-vx80
Butler, J., & Trouble, G. (1990). Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Gender Trouble, 3(1), 3–17.
Calloni, Marina. (2025). Polarization and enmity in the algorithmic age. Striving for a digital ethos of relationality and pluralism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 51(4), 672–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537251327724
Carroll, W. K. (2024). The Elgar Companion to Antonio Gramsci. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802208603
Cohen, N., & Oreg, A. (2025). “I am a guest man in a world of women”: The lived experiences of gay fathers utilizing human milk donations for their babies. Social Science & Medicine, 365, 117567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117567
Denisova, A. (2021). ‘Viral journalism’, is it a thing? Adapting quality reporting to shifting social media algorithms and wavering audiences. In The Routledge Companion to Political Journalism (pp. 271–278). Routledge.
Dhawan, N., & do Mar Castro Varela, M. (2016). “What Difference Does Difference Make?”: Diversity, Intersectionality, and Transnational Feminist Politics. Wagadu: Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies, 16, 11.
Diko, M. (2024). Uncovering Hidden Oppressions: Probing the Use of Patriarchal Language in Genesis 3:16, Ephesians 5:22-24, and 1 Timothy 2:11-12 Through Poststructuralist Feminism. Journal for Semitics, 33(1–2). https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/17508
Edenborg, E. (2023). Anti-Gender Politics as Discourse Coalitions: Russia’s Domestic and International Promotion of “Traditional Values.” Problems of Post-Communism, 70(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987269
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, 18, 170.
Fox, K., Dowling, D. O., & Miller, K. J. (2025). Advocacy and Activism in Sports Podcasts: Expanding Journalistic Roles. Media and Communication, 13, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8975
Golan, O., & Martini, M. (2019). Religious live-streaming: constructing the authentic in real time. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 437–454.
Goshu, B. S., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Bridging religion, science, and spirituality: A holistic approach to peace and understanding. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 6(3), 196–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v6i3.1189
Gramsci, A. (1999). Antonio Gramsci. ElecBook, the Electric Book Company.
Grigoropoulos, I. (2023). Self-Silencing Through the Lens of System Legitimizing Ideologies: Gender Discriminatory Attitudes Mediate the Link Between Conservatism and Women’s Self-Silencing to Sexism. Trends in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00356-x
Hall, S. (1997a). Chapter 1: The work of representation. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, 13–74.
Hall, S. (1997b). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage.
Harp, D., & Bachmann, I. (2018). Gender and the Mediated Political Sphere from a Feminist Theory Lens. In D. Harp, J. Loke, & I. Bachmann (Eds.), Feminist Approaches to Media Theory and Research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90838-0_13
Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Fricker, R. H., Musso, A., Hausladen, C. I., Carissimo, C., Carpentras, D., Stockinger, E., Sanchez-Vaquerizo, J. A., & Yang, J. C. (2023). Democracy by design: Perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. Journal of Computational Science, 71, 102061. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061
Hs, M. A., Robikah, S., & Parninsih, I. (2021). Reinterpretation of the Term Al-Nas (QS. Al-Hujurat 13) in Relation to the Social Aspects of Human and Homo Sapiens. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 22(2), 485–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2021.2202-11
Hussain, Amina, Dar, Mishal, & Ganson, Kyle T. (2021). A Post-Structural Feminist Analysis of Eating Disorders Intervention Research. Affilia, 37(3), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099211062942
Iraklis, G. (2024). Examining the Social Tabooisation of Asexuality: The Underpinnings of Anti-Asexual Bias. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 21(4), 1432–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00884-2
Jaber, N. (2025). Beyond International Human Rights: Islamic Feminism as Alternative Rights Praxis. Feminist Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-025-09577-0
Katrina, N. T. (2020). Competing gender discourses: A multi-modal analysis of gender representations and femininity in a Philippine magazine. I-Manager’s Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26634/jhss.1.2.16910
Kenway, J., & Howard, A. (2022). Elite universities: Their monstrous promises and promising monsters. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1994837
Khan, Rabea M. (2021). Speaking “religion” through a gender code: The discursive power and gendered-racial implications of the religious label. Critical Research on Religion, 10(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032211015302
Khodadadi, B. (2024). “Nowhere but Everywhere”: The Principle of Legality and the Complexities of Judicial Discretion in Iran. Iranian Studies, 57(4), 651–670. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/irn.2024.23
Kumari, S. (2021). Meme culture and social media as gendered spaces of dissent and dominance. Journal of Visual Literacy, 40(3–4), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1974775
Laskar, K. A. (2024). Mediated mythical discourses: A critical analysis of the female docility and religious discourses in Indian TV soap operas. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 17(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00071_1
Muttaqin, A. (2020). Women’s identity in the digital Islam age: Social media, new religious authority, and gender bias. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i2.7095
Myrttinen, H., & Schulz, P. (2023). Broadening the scope but reasserting male privilege? Potential patriarchal pitfalls of inclusive approaches to gender-based violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 25(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2022.2107555
Nas, A. (2022). “Women in Mosques”: mapping the gendered religious space through online activism. Feminist Media Studies, 22(5), 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1878547
Niklander, C., Soto, A., & Vial, M. (2015). Female gender representations in digital mass media via discourse analysis: A case study. 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170610
Nikmatullah, N., & Emawati. (2024). Conservative Muslim and textual interpretation of the hadiths in polygamy propaganda in Indonesia. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 24(3 SE-Research Articles), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.69598/hasss.24.3.263308
Oloba, B. L., & Blankenship, A. M. (2024). Gender Dynamics in Online Religious Leadership in Nigeria: Investigating How Digital Platforms Shape Communication, Authority, and Influence. Religions, 16(1), 5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010005
Oparnica, Ž., & Hirsch, J. (2025). The Decline of the West and the Rise of the East: Rewriting Jewish Pasts for the Eight Hundredth Maimonides Anniversary in Sarajevo and Cairo. AJS Review: The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies, 49(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2025.a958079
Page, A. (2024). The Role of Imagination in the Preaching of Henry Ward Beecher. Homiletic, 49(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15695/hmltc.v49i1.5622
Patil, S. (2011). Violence of silence: Brahmanic media constructions of caste and gender. Women’s Link, 17(3), 15–19.
Popa, D., & Gavriliu, D. (2015). Gender representations and digital media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.244
Rifai, A. (2021). The discourse of women’s piety and gender bias construction Muslimah Websites in Indonesia. Al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 6(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-balagh.v6i2.3402
Salamon, E. (2024). The Political Economy of News Media and Journalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1531
Scholz, S., & Vander Stichele, C. (2024). Introduction: Why Thinking about Texts Matters in Contemporary Yoga Studies. In Contemporary Yoga and Sacred Texts (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Senn, J., Maire, S., & Ghio, A. (2025). Constructing gender through reporting: unveiling the rhetorical strategies of an NGO from 1995 to 2021. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 38(5), 1454–1482. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2024-7053
Silva, C. (2023). Fighting Against Hate Speech: A Case for Harnessing Interactive Digital Counter-Narratives BT - Interactive Storytelling (L. Holloway-Attaway & J. T. Murray (eds.); pp. 159–174). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_10
Sirri, L. (2024). From theory to action: a Saudi Arabian case study of feminist academic activism against state oppression. Societies, 14(3), 31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14030031
Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2019). Internet and Islamic learning practices in Indonesia: Social media, religious populism, and religious authority. Religions, 11(1), 19.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Susanti Ainul Fitri, Novrizon Marzal, Iman Mukhroman, Dudy Imanuddin Effendi, Dindin Solahudin
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).