AI as Spiritual Teacher: Reinterpreting Religious Authority through Connolly's Phenomenological-Hermeneutic Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i3.53331Keywords:
AI and religion, Hermeneutics, Peter Connolly, phenomenology of religion, religious authority, spiritual mediaticsAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has given rise to new dynamics in religious practices and discourse: from interpretation chatbots, automated fatwa applications, to robotics-based representations of religious figures. This article proposes a conceptual reading of this phenomenon using a phenomenological-hermeneutic lens as recommended by Peter Connolly. This research aims to conceptually examine how AI transforms religious experience and authority, and how phenomenological and hermeneutic approaches can be used to understand technologically mediated religious experiences. Rather than assessing the authority of AI normatively or reducing it to a mere social product, this study positions technologically mediated religious experiences as meaningful objects, which also need to be understood from within (phenomenology) and interpreted as new symbolic texts (hermeneutics). The analysis is conducted through a critical reading of interdisciplinary literature on religion, media, and artificial intelligence, with reference to Peter Connolly's phenomenological-hermeneutic ideas on religious experience and the process of symbolic meaning. The results of this study indicate that AI has the potential to function as a new hermeneutic space, not as an absolute substitute for spiritual teachers, but as a relational arena where authority, meaning, and transcendental experience are renegotiated. In this space, the presence of technology expands the horizons of human religious experience, while simultaneously demanding a rereading of legitimacy, awareness, and moral responsibility in digital religious practices. This article concludes with epistemological implications for contemporary religious studies and ethical considerations regarding the limits of digital authority. The study's primary contribution is the development of a theoretical framework for a reflective reading of digital spirituality, one that maintains a balance between the depth of religious experience and a critique of technological commodification.
References
Alkhouri, K. I. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Study of the Psychology of Religion. Religions, 15(3), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030290
Campbell, H. A. (2013). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI Ethics. MIT Press.
Connolly, P. (2002). Approaches to The Study of Religion. Cassell.
Cook, C. C. H., Powell, A., Alderson-Day, B., & Woods, A. (2022). Hearing spiritually significant voices: A phenomenological survey and taxonomy. Medical Humanities, 48(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-012021
Creswell. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.
Ding, D., & Yusof, A. M. B. (2025). Investigating The Role of AI-Powered Conversation Bots in Enhancing L2 Speaking Skills and Reducing Speaking Anxiety: A Mixed Methods Study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1223. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05550-z
Floridi, L. (2014). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press.
Geraci, R. M. (2014). Virtually Sacred: Myth and Meaning in World of Warcraft and Second Life. Oxford University Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. Routledge.
Hoover, S. M. (2006). Religion in the Media Age. Routledge.
Kroesbergen, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Religion: From Theology to Philosophy of Religion. HTS Theological Studies, 76(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030375
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Leeuw, & Gerardus. (1938). Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology. Macmillan.
Lynch, G. (2012). Understanding Theology and Popular Culture. Blackwell Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Postman, N. (2006). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books.
Przygoda, W., Rynio, A., & Kalisz, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence : A New Challenge for Human Understanding, Christian Education , and the Pastoral Activity of the Churches. Religion, 16(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16080948
Puling, H. (2025). Refleksi Teologis Tentang Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Era Algoritma. REI MAI: Jurnal Ilmu Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 3(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.69748/jrm.v3i2.376
Reed, R. (2021). A.I. in Religion, A.I. for Religion, A.I. and Religion: Towards a Theory of Religious Studies and Artificial Intelligence. Religions, 12(6), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060401
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Schleiermacher, F. (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism. Cambridge University Press.
Schweiker, W. (2018). Theological Ethics and the Challenge of Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Christian Ethics, 31(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050563
Smart, N. (1996). Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. University of California Press.
Syam, N. W. (2021). Transendensi dalam Era Mediatika: Membaca Ulang Relasi Spiritual dan Teknologi [Transcendence in the Mediatic Era: Rereading the Relationship between Spirituality and Technology]. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi Islam, 17(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsa.2024.182-01 [In Indonesian]
Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of Faith. Harper & Row.
Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2019). Human Flourishing in an Age of Artificial Intelligence. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 54(2), 459–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17010088
Tsuria, R., & Tsuria, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence ’s Understanding of Religion : Investigating Intelligence Tools. Religions, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030375
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
Ward, G. (2019). How the Light Gets In: Ethical Life I. Oxford University Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tukma Triputri Daulay, Dody S. Truna, Raden Roro Sri Rejeki Waluyajati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).