Islamic Epistemology from Al-Buti’s Perspective: Criticism of Positivism in the Preface to the Book of Kubra al Yaqiniyyat al Kawniyyah

Islamic Epistemology from Al-Buti’s Perspective: Criticism of Positivism in the Preface to the Book of Kubra al Yaqiniyyat al Kawniyyah

Penulis

  • Subadar Subadar STAI Imam Syafi'i Cianjur
  • Neng Hannah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v6i3.56865

Kata Kunci:

al-Buti, contemporary theology, Islamic epistemology, manhaj ilmi, Positivism

Abstrak

This research is motivated by the hegemony of Western materialistic positivist epistemology, which reduces science to the empirical realm, triggers an epistemological crisis, and delegitimizes metaphysical truths. The study addresses how Shaykh M. Said Ramadhan Al-Buti’s Islamic epistemology critiques materialistic positivism and evaluates its methodology as an effective antithesis. The objectives are to analyze Al-Buti’s manhaj ilmi, evaluate his critique of positivism, assess its methodological effectiveness, and outline its implications for contemporary Islamic theology in counteracting atheism. The framework relies on Al-Buti’s integrative epistemology, synergizing the senses (al-hiss), reason (al-’aql), and valid news (al-khabar al-sadiq) to achieve certainty (al-yaqin). Employing a qualitative literature study with philosophical-epistemological, historical-sociological, and dialectical-critical approaches, the primary data source is the Preamble of Kubra al-Yaqiniyyat al-Kawniyyah, supported by secondary literature on science philosophy. Data collected via critical reading and proposition extraction were analyzed using descriptive-analytical, comparative, and dialectical-critical methods. Results demonstrate that Al-Buti’s manhaj ilmi rejects the reason-revelation dichotomy by establishing proportional standards of proof based on the object’s nature (empirical for physical matter; analytical-transmissive for metaphysics). His critique successfully falsifies positivism by exposing internal contradictions within its verification principles and taxonomic reductions. Critical reflection reveals that despite suspending qiyas mantiqi, Al-Buti’s methodology remains a highly effective counter to modern positivism. Its implications offer a philosophical resolution refuting scientism and establishing a sound argumentative foundation for faith education. In conclusion, Islamic theology possesses an independent, objective scientific methodology that dismantles Western positivism's monopoly on truth while restoring the authority of revelation and reason.

Referensi

Abdullah, F., & Hosaini, H. (2025). Positivisme Sebagai Era Baru Filsafat dan Pengaruhnya dalam Kajian Sosial Islam [Positivism as a New Era of Philosophy and Its Influence on Islamic Social Studies]. Edukais : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.61595/edukais.2024.8.1.23-41 [In Indonesian]

Abdullah, Omar, Al-Shafi’i, M. M. O., Shuhari, M. H., Harun, N., Jusoh, W. H. W., & Zin, A. D. M. (2018). Contemplation as a Mean to Achieve Recognition of Allah. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4718

Abdussalam, A., Supriadi, U., Parhan, M., & Budiyanti, N. (2020). Pengembangan Model Ulul Ilmi dalam Pembelajaran PAI untuk Pembentukan Karakter Mahasiswa Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 [Development of the Ulul Ilmi Model in Islamic Religious Education Learning for the Formation of Student Character in the Industrial Revolut. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Keagamaan, 15(02), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v15i02.529 [In Indonesian]

Adeniyi, F. F., Olumuyiwa, O. O., & Aremu, K. T. (2022). Relative Contributions of Disaggregated Government Social Expenditure to Income Poverty Reduction in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 06(03), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2022.6317

Al-Būṭi, M. S. R. (1997). Paper presented at Prosiding Nadwah Ulama Nusantara.

Al-Būṭī, M. S. R. (1960). Al-Bidayat: Bakurah A’mali al-Fikriyyah. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Būṭī, M. S. R. (2020). Ḍawābiṭ al-maṣlaḥah fī al-sharīʿah al-islāmiyyah (New revise). Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1973). Al-Mustasfa min ’Ilm al-Ushul. Al-Maktabah al-Tijariyah al-Kubra.

al-Hamid, A., & Al-Din, M. M. (1942). Risalat Al-Adab Fi ’Ilm Adab al-Bahth. al-Maktabah al-Tijāriyyah al-Kubrā.

Al-Razi, F. al-D. M. ibn U. (1992). Al-Mahsul fi Ilm Usul al-Fiqh. Khurasan.

Almaliki, M. H., Sadeq, M., & Ahmad, R. (2018). An Analytical Study of al-Buti’s Contribution to Maqṣad al-‘Aqidah: Reflections from Kubra al-Yaqiniyyat al-Kawniyyah. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 20(2), 243–278. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol20no2.8

Ariani, F., & Hak, N. (2024). Historiografi Islam Modern: Telaah Fiqhus Sirah Karya Muhammad Sa’id Ramadhan al-Buthi [Modern Islamic Historiography: A Study of Fiqhul Sirah by Muhammad Sa’id Ramadhan al-Buthi]. Thaqafiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa, Peradaban Dan Informasi Islam, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/thaq.2024.23203 [In Indonesian]

Ayer, A. J. (1981). The Vienna Circle. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00435.x

Azka, M. F. (2023). Al-Qur’an, Realitas, Saintisme, dan Persoalan Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Tinjauan Ringkas [The Qur’an, Reality, Scientism, and the Problems of the Philosophy of Science: A Brief Review]. Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an, 23(01), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.53828/alburhan.v23i01.1278 [In Indonesian]

Azmi, M. F., & Wahab, M. R. (2013). Kedudukan Akal dalam Pendalilan Akidah [The Position of Reason in the Argument of Faith]. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.1563 [In Indonesian]

Basith, A. (2019). Konsep Istinbath Hukum Kontemporer Menurut Said Ramadlan al-Buthi [The Concept of Contemporary Legal Istinbath According to Said Ramadlan al-Buthi]. An-Nidzam: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33507/an-nidzam.v6i1.178 [In Indonesian]

Berke, Z. (2024). Two Critics of Logical Positivism: Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn. International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(33), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.8.33.12

Catto, R., Shillitoe, R., Jones, S. H., Kaden, T., & Elsdon-Baker, F. (2023). The Social Imaginary of Science and Nonreligion: Narrating the Connection in the Anglophone West. Secularism and Nonreligion, 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.163

Christmann, A. (1998). Islamic scholar and religious leader: A portrait of Shaykh Muhammad Sa’id Ramadan al‐Būti. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 9(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419808721146

Comte, A. (2009). A General View of Positivism. Cambridge University Press.

Comte, A. (2012). Cours de philosophie positive. In La Gaya Scienza. Hermann. https://doi.org/10.3917/herm.comte.2012.01

Fauzi, A. (2016). Al-Maslahah al-Syar’iyah Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam (Kajian Kitab Dawabith al-Mashlahah Syeh Said Ramadan Buti) [Al-Maslahah al-Syar’iyah as a Source of Islamic Law (A Study of the Book Dawabith al-Mashlahah by Sheikh Said Ramadan Buti)]. Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v27i2.271 [In Indonesian]

Fudah, S. (2012). Tadʿīm al-Manṭiq: Jawlah Naqdiyyah Maʿa al-Muʿāriḍīn li ʿIlm al-Manṭiq min al-Mutaqaddimīn (3rd ed.). Amman, Jordan: Dār al-Nūr al-Mubīn.

Fudah, S. ’Abd al-L. (2004). Mawqif al-Imām al-Ghazālī min ʿIlm al-Kalām: Wa Bayān Mawqifihi minhu fī Kitāb Iljām al-ʿAwām ʿan ʿIlm al-Kalām. Amman, Jordan: Dār al-Rāzī.

Ghazali, M. R. (2011). Pandangan Akidah Muhammad Sa‘id Ramadan al-Buti dalam Buku Kubra al-Yaqiniyyat al-Kawniyyat [The View of Muhammad Sa’id Ramadan al-Buti’s Faith in the Book Kubra al-Yaqiniyyat al-Kawniyyat]. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM).

Hammond, A. (2022). “The Imam of modern Egypt was a sceptic”: Mustafa Sabri’s Radical Critique of Muhammad ʿAbduh and Modernist Theology. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 32(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186321000663

Hayani, I., Bancin, D. R. E. J., Hasibuan, A., Salsabila, I., Azizah, A. N., & Salsabilla, S. (2026). Makna Semantik Kata ‘Ilm dalam Al-Qur’an: Implikasi bagi Pendidikan Islam [The Semantic Meaning of the Word ‘Ilm in the Qur’an: Implications for Islamic Education]. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(3), 2313–2333. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i3.2672 [In Indonesian]

Hijazi, ‘Iwad Allah Jad. (1998). Al-Murshid al-Salīm fī al-Manṭiq al-Ḥadīth wa al-Qadīm. Cairo: Dār al-Ṭibā‘ah al-Muḥammadiyya.

Irsyad, M., & Alwis, A. (2023). Kontribusi Muhammad Said Ramadhan al-Buthi dalam Studi Al-Qur’an [The Contribution of Muhammad Said Ramadhan al-Buthi to the Study of the Qur’an]. AL-AQWAM: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Tafsir, 2(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.58194/alaqwam.v2i1.596 [In Indonesian]

Karl R. Popper. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Lumbard, J. E. B. (2024). Islam and the Challenge of Epistemic Sovereignty. Religions, 15(4), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040406

Mahfud, & Patsun. (2019). Mengenal filsafat antara metode praktik dan pemikiran Socrates, Plato dan Aristoteles [Get to know philosophy between the practical methods and thoughts of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle]. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.37348/cendekia.v5i1.68 [In Indonesian]

Marzuki, I. (2022). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian (teori dan praktik) [Research methodology textbook (theory and practice)]. CV. Feniks Muda Sejahtera.

Mukit, A. (2015). Pendidikan akidah: Telaah pemikiran Muhammad Sa’id Ramdlan Al-Buthi [Faith education: Study of the thoughts of Muhammad Sa’id Ramdlan Al-Buthi]. Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.32832/tawazun.v8i1.1130 [In Indonesian]

Naamy, N. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasinya [Qualitative research methodology: Basics and applications]. Pusat Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah LP2M UIN Mataram.

Nica, A. A. (2020). Leaving My Religion: How Ex-Fundamentalists Reconstruct Identity Related to Well-Being. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(4), 2120–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00975-8

Peels, R. (2023). Scientism and scientific fundamentalism: what science can learn from mainstream religion. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152246

Pérez, S., & Vallières, F. (2019). How Do Religious People Become Atheists? Applying a Grounded Theory Approach to Propose a Model of Deconversion. Secularism and Nonreligion, 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.108

Pigliucci, M. (2013). Does Scientism Undermine Other Forms of Knowledge? Philosophy Now.

Rahman, F. (2020). Antara Timur Dan Barat: Merefleksikan Pendidikan Karakter Indonesia Melalui Pemikiran Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana [Between East and West: Reflecting on Indonesian Character Education Through the Thoughts of Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana]. Jantra., 15(1). https://doi.org/10.52829/jantra.v15i1.130 [In Indonesian]

Rawanita, M., & Syabuddin, S. (2024). Scientific Interpretation and Its Significance in the Development of Science. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v2i3.70

RIdwan, M., & Mahmud, B. (2025). A Critical Analysis of Patriarchal Constructs in Ibn Kathir’s Exegesis of Gender-Related Qur’anic Verses. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 8(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.58518/alfurqon.v8i1.3447

Russell, B., & Jatmiko, S. (2004). Sejarah filsafat Barat: Kaitannya dengan kondisi sosio-politik dari zaman kuno hingga sekarang [History of Western philosophy: Its relation to socio-political conditions from ancient times to the present]. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sabri, M. M. A.-‘Aql W. al-‘Ilm W. al-‘Alam M. R. al-‘Alamin W. (1981). Mawqif al-‘Aql wa al-‘Ilm wa al-‘Alam min Rabb al-‘Alamin wa ‘Ibadih al-Mursalin. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.

Sari, D. A. (2020). Epistemologi Dalam Filsafat Barat [Epistemology in Western Philosophy]. Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 5(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v5i1.5685 [In Indonesian]

Scott, C. (2016). The frontiers of empirical science: A Thomist-inspired critique of scientism. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 72(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i3.3180

Stadler, F. (2015). The Vienna Circle (Vol. 4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16561-5

Sultan, S., Akmaluddin, A., & Suhartatik, S. (2026). Membaca Alam dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia: Konstruksi Ideologi Hijau Melalui Pendekatan Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional [Reading Nature in Indonesian Language Textbooks: The Construction of Green Ideology Through a Systemic Functional Linguistic Approa. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v8i1.8655 [In Indonesian]

Taftazani, S. al-D. M. bin ’Umar al-. (1990). Sharḥ al-‘Aqā’id al-Nasafiyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Zarkasyi, A. F. (2009). Al-Salaf wa al-Salafiyah fi al-Fikr al-Islamy. TSAQAFAH, 5(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v5i1.152

Diterbitkan

2026-08-11
Loading...