The Robustness of Balinese Hindu Sacred Art in the Face of Hegel's Theory 'The Death of Art'


Abdulloh Fuadi(1*)

(1) UIN Mataram, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The integration of art as an integral part of the sacred rituals of Balinese Hindu worship to this day makes the discussion of Hegel's thoughts on art is interesting. This paper attempts to discuss Hegel's theory as confronted with the sacred Balinese Hindu art. The most basic reason for the death of art is that since romantic, art has lost its subject matter. The process of dematerialisation in art gave rise to Hegel's very famous adage; the death of art. Art loses subject matter because of the limited media to express the complexity of the Absolute Spirit. However, the sacredness of Balinese Hindu art has been deeply guarded by the Balinese people. Various concepts and classifications are made to maintain its sacredness, such as the concept of belief, the concept of sekala-niskala, the concept of tri hita karana,the concept of kala patra village, the concept of karmaphala, and the concept of taksu/jengah. There is also a classification of sacred and profane arts. It is made by Balinese Hindus to maintain the sacredness of art itself. Through the art of wali and bebalih, the Balinese Hindu art maintains its subject matter concerning the complexity of the Absolute Spirit, as suggested by Hegel. Based on library research, the paper argues that the unique concept of Balinese Hindu, which may represent the wealth of indigenous religions in Indonesia, concerning sacred art can maintain its uniqueness in the global discourse arena and be able to respond creatively to contemporary challenges.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arsana, I. N. C. (2014). Kosmologis Tetabuhan dalam Upacara Ngaben. Jurnal Resital, 15(2).

Astini, S. M., & Utina, U. T. (2007). Tari Pendet sebagai Tari Balih-Balihan. Harmonia Jurnal Pengetahuan Dan Pemikiran Seni, VIII(2).

Bertram, G. W. (2017). Why Does the End of Art Matter for Art in General? In A. Bertinetto & G. Garelli (Eds.), Morte dell’arte e rinascita dell’immagine (pp. 19–29). Giugno.

Carter, C. (1980). A Re-examination of the “Death of Art” Interpretation of Hegel’s Aesthetics. In W. E. Steinkraus & K. I. Schmitz (Eds.), Art and Logic in Hegel’s Philosophy (pp. 83–100). Humanities Press.

Davies, S. (2007). Balinese Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(1), 21–29.

Harahap, N. (2014). Penelitian Kepustakaan. Journal Iqra’, 08(01).

Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami – Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Kanisius.

Hauskeller, M. (2015). Seni – Apa Itu? Posisi Estetika dari Platon sampai Danto (M. J. Wizemann & S. Graha, Trans.). Kanisius.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1975a). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Volume I (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1975b). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Volume II (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). The Philosophy of History (J. Sibree, Trans.). Prometheus Books.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). The Science of Logic (G. di Giovanni, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

James, D. (2009). Art, Myth and Society in Hegel’s Aesthetics. Continuum.

Karthadinata, D. M. (2008). Estetika Hindu Dalam Kesenian Bali. Jurnal Imajinasi, 4(1).

Keene, M. (2006). Agama-Agama Dunia. Kanisius.

Knott, K. (1998). Hinduism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

McDaniel, J. (2010). Agama Hindu Dharma Indonesia as a New Religious Movement: Hinduism Recreated in the Image of Islam. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 14(1), 93–111.

Miller, J. (2012). The ’Death of Art’ and Painting the “Sunday of Life”: Hegel on the Fate of Modern Art. Evental Aesthetics, 1(1), 39–47.

Otto, R. (1950). The Idea of the Holy. Oxford University Press.

Picard, M. (2011). Balinese religion in search of recognition: From “Agama Hindu Bali” to “Agama Hindu” (19451965). Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 167(4), 482–510.

Subrata, I. W. (2014). Ideologi Komodifikasi Seni Pertunjukan Barong di Banjar Denjalan-Batur, Batubulan, Gianyar. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ article/view/9732/7263

Sugiharto, B. (2015). Untuk Apa Seni? Matahari.

Sugiharto, B. (2016). Metafisika Kebudayaan (Vol. 4). Pustaka Matahari.

Sukarma, I. W. (2015). Sistem Ketuhanan Agama Hindu. Jurnal Jnana Budaya, 20(1).

Sumardjo, J. (2000). Filsafat Seni. Penerbit ITB.

Sunarto. (2015). Seni yang Absolut Menurut G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831). Jurnal Imaji, 13(1).

Supartha, W. (2012). Bentuk dan Fungsi Pertunjukan Wayang Lemah dalam Kehidupan Religius Umat Hindu di Bali. Jurnal Widya Duta, 1.

Suteja, I. M. D. (2010). Seni Pertunjukan Tradisional Bali ke Kontemporer. Jurnal Jnana Budaya, VIII(15).

Weber, M. (1958). The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism (H. H. Gerth & D. Martindale, Trans.). The Free Press.

Wijaya, N. (2014). Apakah Agama Hindu Bali Modern Lahir dari Tantangan Pancasila dan Islam? Jurnal Kajian Bali, 04(01).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v6i2.17266

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Abdulloh Fuadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya is Indexed By:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Dimensions Moraref Crossref SINTA Portal Garuda Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD) Google ScholarIndonesia One Search
------------

 

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.