Theological Philosophy of Encounter: Fostering Interreligious Dialogue in Pluralistic Societies
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to clarify the role of theological philosophy as a medium for dialogical and interreligious communication in an increasingly pluralistic and globalised world. It seeks to confront epistemological, theological and social barriers that often hinder interfaith dialogue and to propose an inclusive framework grounded in universal ethical values such as love, justice, peace and human dignity. Methodologically, the research adopts a theoretical, descriptive–analytical approach, drawing on key literature in theological philosophy, religious pluralism and interreligious dialogue, with particular attention to the Abrahamic traditions. Through reflective analysis of primary and secondary sources, it identifies major obstacles to interreligious engagement, including divergent epistemological assumptions, historical prejudices, power asymmetries and persistent resistance to pluralism. The findings indicate that a dialogical form of theological philosophy can function as a mediating bridge between religious traditions by emphasising shared ethical commitments without compromising the doctrinal integrity of each faith. Philosophical reflection proves crucial for uncovering common metaphysical and moral ground, for reshaping attitudes to religious “others” and for informing practical strategies, such as dialogical pedagogies, interfaith forums and the constructive use of digital media. The study contributes to current scholarship by integrating theological philosophy more explicitly into both theoretical and practical discussions of interfaith dialogue and by articulating a conceptual framework that links metaphysical reasoning, hermeneutics and social practice. Its implications extend to the promotion of social cohesion in pluralistic societies such as Indonesia, where constitutional pluralism and rich religious diversity coexist with real risks of polarisation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Alawode, A. O. (2023). Challenges of Church Planting in the Book of Acts, its Implications for Contemporary Church. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8317
Amiruddin, A., Qorib, M., & Zailani, Z. (2021). A study of the role of Islamic spirituality in the happiness of Muslim citizens. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6655
Armstrong, K. (2010). The case for God. Anchor.
Berger, P. L. (2011). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.
Calzado, M. (2020). Electoral criminology and campaign positioning: Insecurity, proximity, and leadership in the 2015 Argentine presidential elections. Palabra Clave, 23(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.3.3
Castells, M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network society." Contemporary sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 29(5), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234
Chrabieh, P., & Roussel, J.-F. (2005). Pragmatic theologies and interreligious dialogue: A plural speech practice and discipline; [Théologies pragmatiques et dialogue interreligieux: Une pratique et une discipline de la parole plurielle]. Studies in Religion-Sciences Religieuses, 34(3–4), 375 – 390. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842980503400304
Comeau, G. (2012). For a practical theology of inter-religious dialogue; [Pour une théologie pratique du dialogue inter-religieux]. Revue Theologique de Louvain, 43(2), 242 – 256. https://doi.org/10.2143/RTL.43.2.2159009
Fernández, J. R. M. (2025). Hermeneutic foundations for a theology of interreligiosity: The contribution of the theology of religious diversity to a culture of peace. In Religion and foreign affairs: Interreligious dialogue, diplomacy and peace-building. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85215253668&partnerID=40&md5=4f8f8859c91fffbdd7054c68a4cc55bc
Glavind, I. M. L. (2023). Temporal Belonging: Loss of Time and Fragile Attempts to Belong with Alzheimer’s Disease. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 47(3), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-022-09803-3
Hick, J. (1988). God and the universe of faiths: Essays in the philosophy of religion. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19049-2
Hick, J. (1989). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. Yale University Press.
Hick, J. (2004). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. Yale University Press.
Hou, B., Wu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2023). How Does Religious Belief Affect Happiness of Older Adults: The Participation Effect and Support Effect. Religions, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020243
Hunt, D., & Stevenson, S. A. (2017). Decolonizing geographies of power: Indigenous digital counter-mapping practices on Turtle Island. Settler Colonial Studies, 7(3), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2016.1186311
Jansen, A., Dima, A. M., Biclesanu, I., & Point, S. (2019). Career success through the past six decades: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.2478/piece-2022-0070
Khotimah, K., & Sukron, M. (2023). The realization of religion moderation in Tareqa Al-Yusriyyah As-Siddiqiyyah Ash-Shadhiliyyah. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V79I1.7964
Knitter, P. (2020). Dialogical Theology and Social Engagement. In Religious Diversity and Interreligious Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31856-7_23
Krasicki, A., & Klarin, M. (2022). Nazareth School As a Stimulus in the Biblical Formation of the Family Community Agnus Dei. Különleges Bánásmód - Interdiszciplináris Folyóirat, 8(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.18458/kb.2022.1.103
Küng, H. (1991). Global responsibility: In search of a new world ethic. Crossroad.
Küng, H. (1997). A global ethic in an age of globalization. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857310
Levi, A. H. (2022). Worship: Bowing down in the service of God. Religious Studies, 58(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000044
Liefbroer, A. I., Ganzevoort, R. R., & Olsman, E. (2019). Addressing the spiritual domain in a plural society: What is the best mode of integrating spiritual care into healthcare? Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 22(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1590806
Losada-Sierra, M., & Mandalios, J. (2014). The prophetic reason for religious and cultural understanding. International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies, 11(2), 13 – 22. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0047/CGP/v11i02/43549
McGrath, A. E. (2006). Christianity: An introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). The clash within: Democracy, religious violence, and India’s future. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041561
Pannenberg, W. (1991). Systematic theology (Vol. 1). Eerdmans. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567691118
Sabri, S. A., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). News Reporting on Religious Issues: Malaysian Media Practitioners’ Perspective. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3803-18
Schlenker, L. (2021). From Shared Meals to Interreligious Conversations. Ecumenical Review, 73(5), 702 – 713. https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12649
Solihin, S. M., Jassem, L. S., Osmani, N. M., Abbas, E., & Jani, M. S. (2013). Interfaith dialogue between ethics and necessity - A study from the Qur’anic guidelines. Asian Social Science, 9(3), 97 – 106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n3p97
Strahovnik, V. (2022). Holism of Religious Beliefs as a Facet of Intercultural Theology and a Challenge for Interreligious Dialogue. Religions, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070633
Tracy, D. (1981). The analogical imagination: Christian theology and the culture of pluralism. Crossroad. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0360966900018983
Tracy, D. (1994). Plurality and ambiguity: Hermeneutics, religion, hope. University of Chicago Press.
Tyurina, T., & Stavkova, S. (2020). Harmonization of the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres Activity - an Important Component of the Spiritual and Mental Health of Individuals and Humanity. Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal, 4(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.32437/mhgcj.v4i2.84
Volf, M. (1996). Exclusion and embrace: A theological exploration of identity, otherness, and reconciliation. Abingdon Press.
Volf, M. (2006). The end of memory: Remembering rightly in a violent world. Eerdmans.
Volf, M. (2011). A public faith: How followers of Christ should serve the common good. Brazos Press.
Weisse, W. (2025). Interreligious Dialogue in Theology and Religious Education. In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869511.013.22
Wende, S. F. da. S., M., & Markus Schäfer, F. W. (2021). Is it a massacre, or is it terror? Studies in Communication and Media. Studies in Communication and Media, 10(4), 447–501. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2021-4-447.
Wong, K. L., & Lee, C. K. J. (2019). Learning to live together in polarized and pluralistic societies: Hong Kong teachers’ views of democratic values versus patriotic values. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00012_1
Wright, N. T. (2011). Simply Jesus: A new vision of who he was, what he did, and why he matters. Harper.