Personal Branding, Party Image, and Political Promotion as Determinants of Voter Decision-Making: The Mediating Effect of Voting Interest in Indonesia’s Local Elections

Personal Branding, Party Image, and Political Promotion as Determinants of Voter Decision-Making: The Mediating Effect of Voting Interest in Indonesia’s Local Elections

Authors

  • Intan Agustiani Universitas Kuningan
  • Dikdik Harjadi Universitas Kuningan
  • Dede Djuniardi Universitas Kuningan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v7i4.39592

Keywords:

Personal Branding, Party Image, Promotion, Voting Interest, Voting Decision

Abstract

In 2024, Indonesia will hold general elections to choose legislative candidates at the central and regional levels. Kuningan Regency in West Java also held legislative candidate elections at the regency level. There's an interesting phenomenon where legislative council members consistently win seats in the two previous election cycles. In the context of political marketing, the candidate is the object that must be valuable to be chosen, making competition with a marketing approach interesting to study. To analyze this phenomenon, this research was conducted to determine the factors influencing voters' decisions in choosing legislative candidates for the Kuningan District DPRD. The focus of this research is the analysis of personal branding, party image, and promotions conducted by candidates, with voting interest as a mediating variable. Personal branding is the uniqueness built from a person's skills, experience, and personality, which can shape positive perceptions and a tendency to choose. Party image is related to the impression formed in the public's mind regarding political parties. Promotion is an effort made to introduce candidates to political marketing strategies thru media or public publication channels that are responsive to voters. The object of study is a legislative member from the PDIP party who has consistently won a legislative seat in the Kuningan District Council for two period. The respondents in this study were 200 people who are loyal voters for the candidate and are members and supporters of the PDIP party. The research method uses quantitative analysis with data collected using questionnaires and analyzed using SEM PLS. The research results show that all hypotheses are supported, all independent variables have a positive and significant effect on the decision to choose a candidate, and there is an Voting Interest that mediates the relationship between personal selling, party image, and promotion on the decision to choose. These results indicate that candidates who are consistent in their personal branding have a higher chance of being re-elected, supported by the party's image and promotions that generate strong voting interest and influence legislative candidate voting decisions. Practically, this research has implications for candidates, political parties, and policymakers. Candidates need to manage their personal branding not just for image, but to cultivate genuine interest in the eyes of voters. Political parties need to maintain a consistent image thru reputation, integrity, and tangible performance in order to generate public interest. Meanwhile, policymakers can leverage these insights to design political education strategies and campaign regulations that not only raise awareness but also encourage active voter interest in the democratic process.

References

Alexander, H. E. (1969). Communications and politics: The media and the message. Law and Contemporary Problems, 34(2), 255. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191090

Alfani, H. (2015). Political communication channel and the phenomenon of political communicators in Indonesia. Communication Sphere, 1(1), 33–41. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/communication-sphere/article/view/1306

Alwie, A. F. (2012). Pemasaran politik dan keputusan memilih kelompok pinggiran kota (studi pada kelompok partisipan politik di Kota Pekanbaru). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(6), 220–243.

Anshori, A. (2018). Pengaruh iklan politik terhadap persepsi pemilih Kota Medan tahun 2018. Jurnal Interaksi, 2(2), 132–144.

Ansolabehere, S., & Puy, M. S. (2018). Measuring issue-salience in voters’ preferences. Electoral Studies, 51, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.008

Asmarianika, M. (2017). Personal branding by politicians: Investigating the effect of personalized communication as a personal branding strategy used by politicians to influence individuals’ intention to vote (Issue January).

Bartels, L. M. (2013). Partisanship and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50.

Daudt, H. (1956). Book reviews: Kelley, Stanley. Professional public relation and political power. International Communication Gazette, 2(3), 187–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654925600200313

Gordon, B. R., Lovett, M. J., Shachar, R., Arceneaux, K., Moorthy, S., Peress, M., Rao, A., Sen, S., Soberman, D., & Urminsky, O. (2012). Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 23(2), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9185-2

Harifin, K. M. (2009). Pengaruh personal branding dan positioning terhadap perilaku pemilih dalam Pemilukada di Kabupaten Bonebolango.

Irawatiningrum, S. (2020). Personal branding caleg melalui media sosial. Lingkar Studi Komunikasi (LISKI), 6(2), 107–115.

Kenaphoom, S. (2023). Political marketing: Factors that influence the election decisions. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(22), 90–103.

Kopacheva, E. (2023). The resource model of political participation 2.0: Protesting in semi-authoritarian regimes – A privilege of the privileged (Issue 484) [Doctoral dissertation, Linnaeus University]. https://doi.org/10.15626/LUD.482.202

Lee, C. (2021). News podcast usage in promoting political participation in Korea. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 7(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.7-2-2

Matlosa, K., & Shale, V. (2008). Political-parties-programme-handbook-No-18-EISA (Issue 18). EISA.

McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828694

Megasari. (2023). Impact of party’s image and candidate’s personal image moderated by the campaign on voting intentions members of the regional council of representatives in Indonesia [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Lampung]. https://digilib.unila.ac.id/75297/3/DISERTASI%20TANPA%20BAB%20PEMBAHASAN.pdf

Needham, C., & Smith, G. (2015). Introduction: Political branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990828

Nurbasari, A. (2013). Pengaruh pemasaran politik terhadap keputusan memilih Walikota Bandung. Seminar Nasional: Effective Strategic Planning to Enhance Local Government Accountability and Performance, 5–48.

O’Cass, A. (2009). A resource-based view of the political party and value creation for the voter-citizen: An integrated framework for political marketing. Marketing Theory, 9(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109103066

Pich, C., & Dean, D. (2015). Political branding: Sense of identity or identity crisis? An investigation of the transfer potential of the brand identity prism to the UK Conservative Party. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11–12), 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1018307

Potgieter, E. (2013). Predictors of political participation in new democracies [Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imre.12028/abstract

Prianto, B., & Noorsetya, B. (2016). Implications of declining of political parties image post-election 2014. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(3), 37–41. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9d0132443268210de7cfcb1def3915e4ce18bdf

Sairambay, Y. (2020). Reconceptualising political participation. Human Affairs, 30(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2020-0011

Savigny, H. (2010). Political marketing. In The Oxford handbook of British politics (pp. 1–13). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0043

Savigny, H., & Temple, M. (2010). Political marketing models: The curious incident of the dog that doesn’t bark. Political Studies, 58(5), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00830.x

Scammell, M. (2015). Politics and image: The conceptual value of branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(April), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990829

Thompson, D. F. (2019). The political ethics of political campaigns. In A. Lever & A. Poama (Eds.), Routledge handbook on ethics and public policy. Routledge.

Winther Nielsen, S. (2016). Measuring political brands: An art and a science of mapping the mind. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959682

Downloads

Published

2025-10-26
Loading...