Gender Perspective of Planners as a Gender Focal Point in the Provincial Government of Central Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v6i4.44357Keywords:
Gender Perspective, Gender Mainstreaming, Social Construction, Regional Development Planning, Policy Implementation, Central Sulawesi, Gender Focal Point, Public Sector Planning.Abstract
This study examines the gender perspective of planners in regional apparatus organizations (OPD) within the Central Sulawesi Provincial Government, focusing on their roles as gender focal points in development planning. Using Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s (1966) Social Construction Theory—comprising externalization, objectification, and internalization—this qualitative research, conducted from September 2024 to February 2025, employs purposive sampling to select informants from key OPDs involved in gender-based planning, including the Regional Development Planning Agency, the Inspectorate, the Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection Office, the Education Office, the Population Control and Family Planning Office, and the Central Sulawesi Social Service. Primary data will be collected through in-depth interviews and direct observations of gender mainstreaming (PUG) activities, while secondary data will be sourced from government policies, academic articles, official websites, and books. Data analysis follows the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014), which includes data collection, data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that OPD planners generally exhibit biases in their approach to gender mainstreaming (PUG), where the externalization stage shows varied understandings of PUG alongside efforts to promote gender-responsive development planning, the objectification stage reflects critical perspectives on gender-responsive policies in infrastructure, education, and health, and the internalization stage highlights challenges in fully integrating gender considerations into regional development planning. This study emphasizes the need for capacity-building programs to strengthen planners’ gender perspectives and recommends greater institutional support for sustainable gender mainstreaming in regional governance.References
Aditya, B. J. (2016). Menjadi sintas: Tindakan dan upaya pencegahan dan pemulihan kekerasan seksual. Jurnal Perempuan, 21(2), 143–154. https://www.indonesianfeministjournal.org/index.php/IFJ/article/view/92/93
Allolayuk, A. (2021). Menyingkap sisi gelap pendidikan sebagai arena reproduksi kesenjangan sosial berdasarkan perspektif Pierre Bourdieu. Syntax Idea, 3(8), 1802–1813.
Balkis, A. H. (2020). Gaya kepemimpinan perempuan dalam instansi publik: Studi pada kepemimpinan Susi Pudjiastuti. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 8(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.31629/juan.v8i1.2271
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2020/04/29/e9011b3155d45d70823c141f/statistik-indonesia-2020.html
Dharma, F. A. (2018). Konstruksi realitas sosial: Pemikiran Peter L. Berger tentang kenyataan sosial. Review Paper, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v
Fitriliana, F., Nelliraharti, N., Suri, M., & Kesumawati, K. (2023). Perlindungan terhadap kekerasan seksual di lingkungan sekolah (SMKN 1 Sabang). Journal of Law and Government Science, 9(1), 11–15.
Hendrik, Jamaluddin, I. I., & Septiana, A. R. (2024). Sumber daya dalam penanganan anak korban kekerasan seksual pada Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kabupaten Kolaka Sulawesi Tenggara. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v10i1.421
Horton, P. B., & Hunt, C. L. (1996). Sosiologi Jilid 1 (terjemahan). Erlangga.
Israpil, I. (2017). Budaya patriarki dan kekerasan terhadap perempuan (Sejarah dan perkembangannya). Pusaka, 5(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.31969/pusaka.v5i2.176
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia (KemenPAN-RB). (2023). Kesenjangan gender dalam birokrasi masih jadi masalah. Menpan.Go.Id. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/berita-daerah/kesenjangan-gender-dalam-birokrasi-masih-jadi-masalah
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Madsen, W., & Andrade, C. (2022). Gender-responsive budgeting: Challenges and opportunities for equitable policy implementation. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2009
Mukhopadhyay, M., & Eyben, R. (2021). Gender mainstreaming in development policy: Problems and possibilities. Third World Quarterly, 42(7), 1349-1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1958124
Nazneen, S., & Hickey, S. (2023). The political economy of gender reforms: Why women’s leadership matters. World Development, 167(1), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.105128
Rahmatunnisa, M., Solihah, R., & Ghufroni, F. (2022). Kepemimpinan kepala daerah dalam mewujudkan pengarusutamaan gender di Kabupaten Brebes. JANE (Jurnal Administrasi Negara), 13(2), 319–330.
Safitri, R. (2023). Hubungan gender di parlemen (E. R. Fadillah, Ed.). Deepublish.
Sulaiman, A. (2016). Memahami teori konstruksi sosial Peter L. Berger. Jurnal Society, 6(1), 15–22.
Stratigaki, M. (2005). Gender mainstreaming vs positive action: An ongoing conflict in EU gender equality policy. European Journal of Women's Studies, 12(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805051236
True, J., & Parisi, L. (2023). Mainstreaming gender in global governance: Institutions, policies, and challenges. International Studies Review, 25(4), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad032
Wartoyo, F. X., & Ginting, Y. P. (2023). Kekerasan seksual pada lingkungan perguruan tinggi ditinjau dari nilai Pancasila. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 11(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v11i1.423
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).