Application of Process Hierarchy Analysis on the Internal Rating Credit Line Model for Islamic Banks

Application of Process Hierarchy Analysis on the Internal Rating Credit Line Model for Islamic Banks

Authors

  • Astri Afrilia UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v2i2.8890

Keywords:

Credit Line, Hierarchy Analysis Process, Islamic Bank

Abstract

Banks in carrying out their business activities are always in contact with risk. Therefore, an internal rating system is needed so that the bank can select debtors and counterparts based on the level of risk. One of the bank's activities is the provision of credit lines for Islamic Bank in Indonesia. This study intends to formulate a credit line ranking model for Islamic Banks. This research uses quantitative methods using the Hierarchy Analysis Process method. An important finding of this study is the acquisition of an internal credit line rating model for Islamic Banks which can then be used to assist banks in determining the eligibility of an Islamic Bank to become a bank partner based on the level of risk.

Author Biography

Astri Afrilia, UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG

FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK

References

Akkoc, S., & Vatansever, K. (2013). Fuzzy performance evaluation with AHP and Topsis methods: evidence from turkish banking sector after the global financial crisis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 6(11), 53–74.

Brunelli, M. (2014). Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. Springer.

Bulajic, M., Knezevic, S., Jeremic, V., & Zarkic Joksimovic, N. (2012). Towards a framework for evaluating bank efficiency. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences, 8(2), 377–384.

Chen, Y.-C., Chiu, Y.-H., Huang, C.-W., & Tu, C. H. (2013). The analysis of bank business performance and market risk—Applying Fuzzy DEA. Economic Modelling, 32, 225–232.

Ghozali, M., Azmi, M. U., & Nugroho, W. (2019). Perkembangan Bank Syariah Di Asia Tenggara: Sebuah Kajian Historis. Falah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), 44–55.

Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Mohamadghasemi, A. (2011). A fuzzy AHP-DEA approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3346–3352.

Ishizaka, A., & Nguyen, N. H. (2013). Calibrated fuzzy AHP for current bank account selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3775–3783.

Khosroanjom, D., Ahmadzade, M., Niknafs, A., & Mavi, R. K. (2011). Using fuzzy AHP for evaluating the dimensions of data quality. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 8(3), 269–285.

Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic Modelling, 43, 30–37.

Özbek, A. (2015). Efficiency analysis of foreign-capital banks in Turkey by OCRA and MOORA. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(13), 21–30.

Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N. Y., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2822–2841.

Rezaei, M., & Ketabi, S. (2016). Ranking the banks through performance evaluation by integrating fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods: A study of Iranian private banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 6(3), 19–30.

Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699–11709.

Suyandi, D. (2019). The Effect Of Mudharabah Financing Productivity And Increasing The Member’s Capital Business On The Income Of Mardhotilah BMT Members. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah, 9(1), 23–28.

Ta, H. P., & Har, K. Y. (2000). A study of bank selection decisions in Singapore using the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Bank Marketing.

Tadic, D., Gumus, A. T., Arsovski, S., Aleksic, A., & Stefanovic, M. (2013). An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 25(3), 547–556.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-08-11
Loading...