A Critical Analysis of the Muqoron Interpretation Method: History, Urgency, and Epistemological Debate in Qur'anic Studies

A Critical Analysis of the Muqoron Interpretation Method: History, Urgency, and Epistemological Debate in Qur'anic Studies

Penulis

  • Muhammad Rijalul Fikri UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Rizky Anugrah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/mjiat.v5i2.52218

Kata Kunci:

Tafsir Muqaran, Comparative analysis, madhhab, methodology

Abstrak

This study investigates tafsir muqāran (comparative exegesis) as an important methodological approach in contemporary Qur’anic interpretation. The study focuses on its historical development, epistemological significance, methodological procedures, and various academic debates associated with its application. This research employs a qualitative method through descriptive-analytical and library research approaches. Data were obtained from primary sources consisting of classical and contemporary works of Qur’anic exegesis, complemented by secondary sources such as scholarly articles, previous studies, and relevant academic literature. The collected data were examined using content analysis supported by a hermeneutical perspective to understand the meanings, contexts, and interpretive differences found within tafsir muqāran. Historically, the comparative approach developed in response to the diversity of interpretations that emerged among Muslim scholars and gained greater methodological formulation during the twentieth century. Its implementation generally involves several stages, including identifying and selecting relevant interpretations, examining the intellectual and methodological orientations of exegetes, tracing the factors underlying interpretive differences, conducting critical comparisons, and formulating comprehensive conclusions. The objects of comparison may include Qur’anic verses, exegetical interpretations, schools of thought, and methods of interpretation. The findings demonstrate that tafsir muqāran contributes significantly to strengthening objectivity, broadening intellectual perspectives, developing tolerance toward interpretive diversity, and connecting classical interpretations with contemporary contexts. Nevertheless, its application faces methodological challenges, particularly the complexity of comparative procedures, extensive data requirements, and the possibility of researcher subjectivity. Therefore, tafsir muqāran remains a relevant and valuable approach for developing critical and contextual Qur’anic studies.

Referensi

Abd al-Hayy Al-Farmawi. (1977). Al-Bidayah fi al-Tafsir al-Mawdu’i: Dirasah Manhajiyyah Mawdu’iyyah. Al-Hadar al-’Arabiyyah.

Baidan, N. (2012). Metodologi Penafsiran Al-Qur’an [Methodology of Qur’anic Exegesis]. Pustaka Pelajar.

Fitriatunnisa, A., & Rafdi, D. A. (2024a). Metode Tafsir Muqaran Dilihat Kembali. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 3(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i4.31043

Fitriatunnisa, A., & Rafdi, D. A. (2024b). Metode Tafsir Muqaran Dilihat Kembali [Revisiting the Comparative Method of Exegesis]. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 3(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i4.31043 [In Indonesian]

Fitriono, E. N. (2025). Epistemologi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an [The Epistemology of ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān]. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(2), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v5i2.6730 [In Indonesian]

Ichwan, M. N., & Salisu, A. (2024). Reevaluating Qur’anic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis Between Classical Tafsir and Modern Hermeneutical Approaches. KALAM, 18(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.24042/kalam.v18i2.24213

Jahira, J. S. N. I., & Faisal, F. al-H. (2026). Transformasi Tafsir Muqaran [The Transformation of Comparative Exegesis]. AL-IBANAH, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.54801/hgw9bc38 [In Indonesian]

July, S. (2021). Metode Tafsir Muqaran (Perbanding/Komparasi) [The Method of Comparative Exegesis (Tafsir Muqaran)].

Lutfhi, M., Kurniawan, K. D., Puspitasari Wardoyo, Y., Cahyani, T. D., Nuryasinta, R. K., Fajrin, Y. A., & Anggraeny, I. (2022). Tafsir Bi al-Ma’tsur: Concepts and Methodology. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12140

Mahfud, A., & Kholid, A. (2025). Mazahib Al-Tafsir: An Axiological And Ontological-Epistemological Investigation In The Context Of Qur’anic Interpretation. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 33(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v33i1.36105

Mually, M. A., & Abdulghani, N. A. (2024). Deconstruction in the Maʿnā-Cum-Maghzā Method and Linguistic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis of Qur’anic Interpretative Approaches. Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies, 2(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.33367/al-karim.v2i2.4261

Mustaqim, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir [Research Methods in Quranic Studies and Exegesis]. Idea Press.

Nabil, F. R., Romadlon, A. F. N., & Wirastho, E. (2024). The Meaning of Makar in the Qur’an: A Comparative Study of Hamka’s Interpretation in Tafsir al-Azhar and Sayyid Qutb in Tafsir fi Zhilal al-Qur’an. Al-Shamela : Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies, 2(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v2i2.656

Nasution, A., Ahmad, A. A., Ahmad, K. K., Zulhijjan, M. A., & Sinaga, R. F. (2024). Asbabun Nuzul dan Urgensinya dalam Kajian Ulumul Qur’an [Asbab al-Nuzul and Its Significance in the Study of Ulum al-Qur’an]. Sulawesi Tenggara Educational Journal, 4(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.54297/seduj.v4i3.874 [In Indonesian]

Naufal, M., Azzahra, S. F., & Anisa. (2026). Metode Tafsir Al-Qur’an: Studi Perbandingan antara Pendekatan Tradisional dan Kontemporer [Al-Qur’an Interpretation Methods: Comparative Study between Traditional and Contemporary Approaches]. Taqrib : Journal of Islamic Studies and Education, 4(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.61994/taqrib.v4i1.1368 [In Indonesian]

Nofitayanti, N., Abdussalam, A., & Suresman, E. (2022a). Studi Komparasi Metode Tafsir Tahlily Dan Metode Tafsir Muqaran [A Comparative Study of the Tahlili and Muqaran Methods of Exegesis]. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v1i1.5 [In Indonesian]

Nofitayanti, N., Abdussalam, A., & Suresman, E. (2022b). Studi Komparasi Metode Tafsir Tahlily Dan Metode Tafsir Muqaran [A Comparative Study of the Tahlili and Muqaran Methods of Exegesis]. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v1i1.5 [In Indonesian]

Nukhba, G. M. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Comparative Interpretation of Holy Quran: Approaches, Methodologies, and Criteria for Establishing Plausible Interpretations. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i2.625

Rokhim, A., Fuad, S., & Sahin, C. (2025). Qawāʿid al-Tafsīr as an Epistemological Model for Valid Qur’anic Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis of Marāḥ Labīd and al-Miṣbāḥ. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 23(2), 696–732. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1488

Samsir, S., Salewe, M. I., & Tahir, T. (2025). Relevansi Pendekatan Tekstual Dan Kontekstual (Studi Komparatif Dalam Memahami Pesan Al-Qur’an) [The Relevance of Textual and Contextual Approaches (A Comparative Study on Understanding the Message of the Qur’an)]. TAFASIR: Journal of Quranic Studies, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.62376/tafasir.v3i1.72 [In Indonesian]

Saputra, M. A., & Alwizar, A. (2025). Analisis perbandingan metode tafsir al-Muqaran dan al-Mawdhu’i dalam kajian tematik al-Qur’an [A comparative analysis of the al-Muqaran and al-Mawdhu’i methods of exegesis in the thematic study of the Qur’an]. Takuana: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.56113/takuana.v4i1.120 [In Indonesian]

Sekardilla, T., Karim, D. A., Mahdor, M. M., Soleh, R., & Oki, A. (2024). Religious Pluralism In The View Of Islam (Comparative Interpretation Of Sayyid Quthb And Maulana Farid Esack). Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.57163/almuhafidz.v4i2.137

Shihab, M. Q. (1994). Membumikan Alquran: Fungsi dan Peran Wahyu dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat [Bringing the Quran Down to Earth: The Function and Role of Revelation in Social Life]. Mizan.

Syakir, A. I., Daulay, A. N., & Fitri, S. R. (2025). Metode Tafsir Kontekstual Fazlur Rahman dalam Al-Qur’an Berpendekatan Double Movement dan Sintetis Logis [Fazlur Rahman’s Method of Contextual Qur’anic Exegesis: The Double Movement and Logical Synthesis Approach]. Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Keislaman, 332–342. https://doi.org/10.23917/jkk.v4i3.571 [In Indonesian]

Syukkur, A. (2020). Metode Tafsir al-Qur’an Komprehensif Perspektif Abdul Hay al-Farmawi [The Comprehensive Method of Qur’anic Exegesis: Abdul Hay al-Farmawi’s Perspective]. El-Furqania : Jurnal Ushuluddin Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 6(01), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.54625/elfurqania.v6i01.3779 [In Indonesian]

Ulpah, M. (2019). Metode Tafsir Muqaran [Comparative Exegesis Method]. In Pascasarjana Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an (IIQ) Jakarta. Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an.

Wahid, W. M. A., & Kamils, N. M. R. (2024). Muqaran Tafsir Method: Its History, Basis and Implications. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 4(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v4i3.34234

Yahya, A., Yusuf, K. M., & Alwizar, A. (2022). Metode Tafsir (al-Tafsir al-Tahlili, al-Ijmali, al-Muqaran dan al-Mawdu’i) [Tafsir Methods (al-Tafsir al-Tahlili, al-Ijmali, al-Muqaran and al-Mawdu’i)]. PALAPA, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v10i1.1629 [In Indonesian]

Yunus, B. (2025). Kategorisasi Ilmu Tafsir [Categorization of the Science of Exegesis (Tafsir)]. Yayasan Values Institute.

Diterbitkan

2026-09-24
Loading...