Digital Activism in Social Movements and Its Influence on the Implementation of State Administration in Indonesia

Krismiyati Krismiyati(1*), Irwan Abdu Nugraha(2), Myristica Imanita(3), Satryo Sasono(4), Fakhry Amin(5)

(1) Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Yapis Biak, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sains Al-Qur'an (UNSIQ) Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
(5) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


The existence of digital platforms provides a new space for people to interact. In this case, interaction in the form of activism also takes advantage of the role of technology in carrying out social movements. This social movement can then influence how the implementation of state administration in Indonesia is carried out. This research then examines how digital activism through social movements affects state administration in Indonesia. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The data used in this study comes from various research results and previous studies, which still have relevance to the contents of this research. The results of this study then found that the emergence of technology caused many people to become literate in the world of activism. This causes many changes in the dynamics of the Indonesian state, especially in politics. The emergence of digital activism has led to the need for various changes in regulations and administrative regulations in Indonesia.

Full Text:



Aminah, S., & Saksono, H. (2021). Digital transformation of the government: A case study in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 272-288.

Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2022). Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855-881.

Bryson, J. M., Barberg, B., Crosby, B. C., & Patton, M. Q. (2021). Leading social transformations: Creating public value and advancing the common good. Journal of Change Management, 21(2), 180-202.

Cao, X., Zeng, R., & Evans, R. (2022). Digital activism and collective mourning by Chinese netizens during COVID-19. China Information, 36(2), 159-179.

Chitanana, T. (2020). From Kubatana to# ThisFlag: Trajectories of digital activism in Zimbabwe. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(2), 130-145.

Clarence-Smith, S., & Monticelli, L. (2022). Flexible institutionalisation in Auroville: a prefigurative alternative to development. Sustainability Science, 17(4), 1171-1182.

da Silva Neto, V. J., & Chiarini, T. (2021). Technological progress and political systems: non-institutional digital platforms and political transformation. Technology in Society, 64, 101460.

Deflorian, M. (2021). Refigurative politics: understanding the volatile participation of critical creatives in community gardens, repair cafés and clothing swaps. Social Movement Studies, 20(3), 346-363.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., ... & Wade, M. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102456.

Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263.

George, J. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2019). From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100249.

Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance?. Information, communication & society, 22(6), 854-871.

Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020). Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 195-223.

Hager, A., Hensel, L., Hermle, J., & Roth, C. (2022). Group size and protest mobilization across movements and countermovements. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 1051-1066.

Ireland, L. (2022). We are all (not) Anonymous: Individual-and country-level correlates of support for and opposition to hacktivism. New Media & Society, 14614448221122252.

Lengauer, D. (2021). A genealogy of komunitas: Varieties of social formation and their signification in Bandung, Indonesia. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 32(3), 309-323.

Li, K., Kim, D. J., Lang, K. R., Kauffman, R. J., & Naldi, M. (2020). How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electronic commerce research and applications, 44, 101004.

Mackenzie, S. (2022). Social movement organizing and the politics of emotion from HIV to Covid‐19. Sociology Compass, 16(5), e12979.

Maly, I. (2019). New right metapolitics and the algorithmic activism of Schild & Vrienden. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 2056305119856700.

Martelli, J. T. (2021). The Politics of Our Selves: Left self-fashioning and the production of representative claims in everyday Indian campus politics. Modern Asian Studies, 55(6), 1972-2045.

Milianty, Y., Hartono, E. D., Arrifa, R., William, L., & Marcellino, J. (2023). The Phenomena of Radicalism in The Modern Era (Case Study of Higher Students). Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 6(1).

Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., Angelopoulos, J., Wang, B., & Wang, L. (2022). Human centric platforms for personalized value creation in metaverse. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 653-659.

Panarari, M. (2022). The transformations of “public sphere” category, and the contemporary debate about digital citizenship. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 1-7.

Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., Cantoni, R., Lee, D., Brisbois, M. C., Walnum, H. J., ... & Goel, S. (2022). Conflicted transitions: Exploring the actors, tactics, and outcomes of social opposition against energy infrastructure. Global environmental change, 73, 102473.

Sumiati, W. (2020). The Non-Cooperative Journalists’struggle Against Self-Censorship During The New Order Indonesia (1967-1998). Metahumaniora, 10(1), 52-63.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Krismiyati Krismiyati, Irwan Abdu Nugraha, Myristica Imanita, Satryo Sasono, Fakhry Amin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah
Has Been Indexed on:

Indeks Harvard    


Ministrate : Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International