Analysis of the Existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission in Handling Corruption in Indonesia


Danny Permana(1*)

(1) Universitas Janderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Corruption is a serious problem in Indonesia. Therefore, efforts need to be made to eradicate corruption properly. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) plays a pivotal role in combating corruption. This study seeks to examine the methods employed by the KPK in its anti-corruption endeavors. It will utilize a descriptive qualitative methodology, drawing upon a range of prior research findings and literature reviews as its data sources. The results of this research then found that there are various obstacles in fighting corruption. Therefore, there is a need for cooperation between state institutions in eradicating corruption. This can be done through coordination or preparing work protocols. Then, to increase the credibility of state institutions in eradicating corruption, this can be done by increasing transparency and budget management, strengthening accountability and independence, and increasing public participation in eradicating corruption.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, K. (2021). Corruption Crime Eradication by Corruption Eradication Commission Through Red-handed Catch Operation on Bribery Action. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 13(2), 319-329.

Amini Sedeh, A., Pezeshkan, A., & Caiazza, R. (2022). Innovative entrepreneurship in emerging and developing economies: The effects of entrepreneurial competencies and institutional voids. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-26.

Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Critical Perspectives on the New Situation of Global Ocean Governance. Sustainability, 15(14), 10921.

Correa, V. C., Lugo-Agudelo, L. H., Aguirre-Acevedo, D. C., Contreras, J. A. P., Borrero, A. M. P., Patiño-Lugo, D. F., & Valencia, D. A. C. (2020). Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview. Health research policy and systems, 18, 1-11.

Ferry, L. L., Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Schneider, C. J. (2020). Catch me if you care: International development organizations and national corruption. The Review of International Organizations, 15, 767-792.

Haggart, B., & Keller, C. I. (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6), 102152.

Handitya, B. (2019). The Principles of Good Government in Suppressing Corruption. Law Research Review Quarterly, 5(1), 1-12.

Hashim, H. A., Salleh, Z., Shuhaimi, I., & Ismail, N. A. N. (2020). The risk of financial fraud: a management perspective. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1143-1159.

H.S, Y. T., & Kristian, I. (2021). Model Collaborative Dalam Penanggulangan Gelandangan dan Pengemis di Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(3), 69–81.

Iqbal, M. I., Susanto, S., & Sutoro, M. (2019). Functionalization of E-Court System in Eradicating Judicial Corruption at The Level of Administrative Management. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 19(2), 370-388.

Kristian, I. (2021). Perlukah Konservasi Moral?. Jurnal RASI, 2(1), 40–53.

Kristian, I. (2019). Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Malanski, L. K., & Póvoa, A. C. S. (2021). Economic growth and corruption in emerging markets: does economic freedom matter?. International Economics, 166, 58-70.

Mukhitov, O. M., Shaukenova, Z. K., Kabul, O. K., Yeshniyazova, A. C., & Baigabylov, N. O. (2022). Retracted: Structural measures to prevent radicalism among youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(2), 1123-1134.

Olujobi, O. J., & Yebisi, E. T. (2023). Combating the crimes of money laundering and terrorism financing in Nigeria: A legal approach for combating the menace. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(2), 268-289.

Rustiarini, N. W., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal of public procurement, 19(4), 345-362.

Safitri, N. A., Tarantang, J., Kurniawan, R., & Muharrami, T. A. (2022). The Fraud of Banking Review In Legal Perspective. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 6(1), 41-61.

Sallaberry, J. D., Quaesner, L. S., Costa, M. C., & Flach, L. (2020). Measurement of damage from corruption in Brazil. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1239-1239.

Sanuri, S. (2022). Analysis of hifz al mal in maqasid al shariah against the article Criminal Act of Corruption in the criminal code of Indonesia. Al Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(1), 58-74.

Sharifi, A., & Alizadeh, H. (2023). Societal smart city: Definition and principles for post-pandemic urban policy and practice. Cities, 134, 104207.

Sitompul, A., & Hasibuan, P. (2021). The Morality of Law Enforcement Agencies (Police, Prosecutor’s Office, KPK) in Money Laundering with the Origin of the Corruption. European Science Review, (9-10), 55-63.

Situmorang, M. (2020). The Power of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle in Arbitration Agreement. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21, 447-457.

Spink, J., Bedard, B., Keogh, J., Moyer, D. C., Scimeca, J., & Vasan, A. (2019). International survey of food fraud and related terminology: Preliminary results and discussion. Journal of food science, 84(10), 2705-2718.

Stanislav, S., & Alina, S. (2019). Evolution of the concept of political corruption in western and Russian political science and law. Russian Law Journal, 7(2), 53-80.

Suramin, S. (2021). Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law Enforcement: Current Problems and Challenges. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 225-242.

Tauda, G. A., Huda, N. M., & Omara, A. (2023). Theoretical Reconstruction of the’Existence of the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission and Its Comparison to Other Anti-Corruption Agencies in Asia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 10(2), 172-193.

Usman, M., Husnain, M., Akhtar, M. W., Ali, Y., Riaz, A., & Riaz, A. (2022). From the COVID-19 pandemic to corrupt practices: a tale of two evils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(20), 30297-30310.

Yuda, T. K. (2021). The complementary roles between clientelism and familism in social policy development. Social Policy & Administration, 55(7), 1370-1392.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i1.29959

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i1.29959.g9628

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Danny Permana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah
Has Been Indexed on:

Indeks Harvard    
    
      

 


Ministrate : Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International