A Strategy for Asymmetrical Measures to Reduce Bribery in Bangladesh


Abdullah Al Mahmud(1*), Minhazur Rahman Rezvi(2)

(1) University of Dhaka, Bangladesh
(2) Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Bangladesh is one of the most corrupt countries with a rampant bribery scenario. In the public service sector of this country, service is almost considered to be unattainable without bribing the service providers. From the viewpoint of specialists and ad-hoc academicians, symmetric punishment measure has been a failed mechanism to stop rampant bribery. This study initially pondered the reasoning behind the severity of the bribery scenario in Bangladesh using the dataset of the National Households Survey's 2017 (NHS) of Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB). It analyzed the legal jurisdictions of bribery especially the penal code 1860. In this study, following Basu argument on the asymmetric punishment system (harassment bribe) for India, an asymmetric punishment measure has been proposed through a game theoretical explanation about how it will work for Bangladesh instead of the current symmetric one. This game-theoretical analysis shows that asymmetric punishment is more efficient for reducing rampant bribery in a country than symmetric punishment. The study suggests the government initiate an asymmetric punishment policy on bribery with a strict punitive measure and monitoring of bribe-taking which, with a qualitative approach and case study.

Keywords


Bribery, corruption, symmetric punishment, asymmetric measure, harassment bribe

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. Journal of Public Economics, 111, 17–28.

Anggoro, T., Mulyatin, T. C., Girsang, N. C., Purnama, R., & Ibrahim, T. (2022). Money Politics and Political Participation in the 2019 Legislative Elections in Banjar. Politicon: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 53–74.

Asea, W. B. (2018). Combating political and bureaucratic corruption in Uganda: Colossal challenges for the church and the citizens. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 74(2).

Basu, Karna, Basu, K., & Cordella, T. (2016). Asymmetric punishment as an instrument of corruption control. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 18(6), 831–856.

Basu, Kaushik. (2011). Why, for a Class of Bribes, the Act of Giving a Bribe should be Treated as Legal. Mpra.Ub.Uni-Muenchen.De. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50335

Basyal, D. K., Poudyal, N., & Seo, J.-W. (2018). Does E-government reduce corruption? Evidence from a heterogeneous panel data model. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.

bdlaws.minlaw.gov. (2020). Penal Code 1860 (Act No. XLV of 1860). Bdlaws.Minlaw.Gov. http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-11.html

Campos-Vazquez, R. M., & Mejia, L. A. (2016). Does corruption affect cooperation? A laboratory experiment. Latin American Economic Review, 25(1), 1–19.

CPI. (2014). Corruption Perceptions Index. CPI. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2014/index/dnk#

Dhaka Tribune. (2019). ACC Chairman: 100 government officials arrested for bribery. [online] Dhaka Tribune. Available at: [Accessed]. Dhaka Tribune. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/corruption/2019/12/31/acc-chairman-100-government-officials-arrested-for-bribery

Dixit, A. (2017). Fighting Corruption By Altering Equilibrium In An Assurance Game. Princeton.Edu. https://www.princeton.edu/~dixitak/home/AssurAntiCorr.pdf

Dreze, J. (2011). The bribing game. Indian Express, 23. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/the-bribing-game/

Dwenger, N., Kleven, H., Rasul, I., & Rincke, J. (2016). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Germany. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 203–232.

Engel, C., Goerg, S. J., & Yu, G. (2016). Symmetric vs. asymmetric punishment regimes for collusive bribery. American Law and Economics Review, 18(2), 506–556.

Jancsics, D. (2019). Corruption as resource transfer: An interdisciplinary synthesis. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 523–537.

Li, X. (2012). Guest post: bribery and the limits of game theory – the lessons from China. Www.Ft.Com. https://www.ft.com/content/5861a908-dc8e-3b8e-bc06-7f761227ff6d

Marvão, C. M. P., & Spagnolo, G. (2014). What do we know about the effectiveness of leniency policies? A survey of the empirical and experimental evidence. A Survey of the Empirical and Experimental Evidence (October 1, 2014).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Mushkat, M., & Mushkat, R. (2020). Combatting Corruption in the" Era of Xi Jinping": A Law and Economics Perspective. Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 43, 137.

Muurlink, O., & Macht, S. A. (2020). Managing (out) corruption in NGOs: A case study from the Bangladesh delta. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(6), 1014–1029.

Oak, M. (2015). Legalization of bribe giving when bribe type is endogenous. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(4), 580–604.

Rahman, M. (2018). Governance matters: climate change, corruption, and livelihoods in Bangladesh. Climatic Change, 147(1), 313–326.

RFI. (2011). Bangladeshi anti-corruption official “caught taking bribe.” Www.Rfi.Fr. https://www.rfi.fr/en/asia-pacific/20110124-bangladeshi-anti-corruption-official-caught-taking-bribe

Ryvkin, D., & Serra, D. (2017). Is more competition always better? An experimental study of extortionary corruption. An Experimental Study of Extortionary Corruption (March 14, 2017).

Serra, D. (2012). Combining top-down and bottom-up accountability: evidence from a bribery experiment. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 28(3), 569–587.

TIB. (2018). Corruption in Service Sectors: National Household Survey 2017. https://www.ti-bangladesh.org/beta3/index.php/en/highlights/5667-corruption-in-service-sectors-national-household-survey-2017

Verma, P., & Sengupta, S. (2015). Bribe and punishment: An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of bribery. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133441.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v4i2.17593

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Abdullah Al Mahmud and Minhazur Rahman Rezvi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

1th Floor, Building of FISIP

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: journalpoliticon@uinsgd.ac.id

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

POLITICON : Jurnal Ilmu Politik  are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International