Model Epistemologi Personal dalam Keyakinan Tauhid Nabi Ibrahim As (Perspektif Psikologi dan Islam)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v4i1.1263Keywords:
Monotheistic faith, personal epistemology, Islamic PsychologyAbstract
This library research explores the content of the Quran Surah Al An'am verses 74-79 and Surah Al Baqarah verse 131 about the monotheistic faith of the prophet Ibrahim. Based on the data of historical information and interpretation of Quran from the literature sources that collected through documentation, this study used historical, hermeneutics, and synthetic analysis approaches to uncover the model of personal epistemology from that monotheistic faith. Through descriptive-analytic, descriptive-comparative analyses and interpretation with the pattern of reflective thinking, the result indicates that the psycho-social and spiritual or religiosity conditions created an epistemic climate and encouraged epistemic changes on the prophet Ibrahim. The model of personal epistemology of the prophet Ibrahim accommodate existing models and different from the other models, especially with regard to the involvement of revelation and transcendental awareness factors and psychological qualities such as sincerity, love of truth, courage, and commitment to fight for conviction.
References
Abdullah, M.A. (2006). Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Adzhim, A.A. (1989). Epistemologi dan Aksiologi Ilmu: Perspektif Al Qur’an. Terjemahan A.M. Hakim. Bandung: Remajarosdakarya.
Al Baghawy, I.M.F. (1992). Tafsir Al Baghawy Al Musamma Ma’alimu Al Tanzil (Juz II). Beirut: Dar al Ma’rifah.
Al Isfahani, R. (Tanpa tahun). Al Mufradat fi Gharib Al Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al Ma’rifah.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ashshiddiqi, A.M. (2003). Konsep Epistemologi Pendidikan dalam Al Qur’an dan Implikasinya bagi Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer (Studi Analisis Kandungan Kisah Ibrahim Mencari Tuhan). Skripsi, Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Tahun 2003.
Ash Shabuni, M.A. (1991). Kenabian dan Para Nabi. Terjemahan A.J. Maun. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Asy Syafi’i, S.U.A. (1996). Al Futuhat Al Ilahiyyah bi Taudih Tafsir Al Jalalain li Al Daqaiq Al Khafiyah (Juz II). Beirut: Dar al Kutub al ‘Ilmiyyah.
Ath Thabary, I.J. (1979). Tarikh al Umam wal Mulk (Juz I). Beirut: Dar al Fikr.
Ath Thabary, I.J. (1990). Jami’ul Bayan ‘an Ta’wil Aayi Al Qur’an (Juz VII). Beirut: Dar al Fikr.
Ath Thabary, I.J. (1995). Jami’ul Bayan ‘an Ta’wil Aayi Al Qur’an (Juz I). Beirut: Dar al Fikr.
Ath Thaba’thaba’i, (1991). Al Mizan fi Tafsir Al Qur’an (Juz VII). Beirut: Muassasatu al A’lamy lil al Mathbu’at.
Atsir, I. (Tanpa tahun). Al Kamil fi Al Tarikh (Juz I). Beirut: Dar al Shadir.
Badri, M. (1986). Dilema Psikolog Muslim. Terjemahan S.Z. Luxfiati. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.
Badri, M. (1996). Tafakur: Perspektif Psikologi Islam. Terjemahan U.S. Husnan. Bandung: Remajarosdakarya.
Baharuddin, (2007). Paradigma Psikologi Islami: Studi tentang Elemen Psikologi dari Al Qur’an. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baker, A. & Zubair, A.C. (1998). Metode Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Baqi, M.F.A. (1955). Tafshil Ayat Al Qur’an Al Hakim. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al Kutub al ‘Arabiyyah.
Bastaman, H.D. (1996). Psikologi Islami: What’s in a Name? Dalam M. Thoyibi dan M. Ngemron (Editor), Psikologi Islami. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. 69-81.
Bastaman, H.D. (2005). Integrasi Psikologi dengan Islam: Menuju Psikologi Islami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Chan, K. (2007). Hong Kong Teacher Education Students’ Epistemological Beliefs and Their Relations with Conceptions of Learning and Learning Strategies. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Vol. 16 No. 2, December 2007, 199-214.
Departemen Agama R.I. (2002). Al Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Madinah: Lembaga Percetakan Al Qur’an Raja Fahd.
Greene, J.A., Torney, J., & Azevedo, R. (2010). Empirical Evidence Regarding Relations Among a Model of Epistemic and Ontological Cognition, Academic Performance, and Educational Level. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 102 No. 1, 234-255.
Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Haque, Z. (2000). Wahyu dan Revolusi. Terjemahan E. Setiyawati Al Khattab. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Hofer, B.K. (2001). Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 13 No. 4, December 2001, 353-383.
Katsier, I. (2002). Qasas Al Anbiya. Beirut: Muassasatul Rayyan.
Kuntowijoyo. (2005). Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, dan Etika. Jakarta: Teraju.
Muhadjir, N. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Psikologi Islami: Dari Filsafat Ilmu sampai Metodologi. Dalam M. Thoyibi dan M. Ngemron (Editor), Psikologi Islami, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Muhadjir, N. (1998). Filsafat Ilmu: Telaah Sistematis Fungsional Komparatif (I). Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Muhadjir, N. (2004). Wahyu dalam Paradigma Penelitian Ilmiah Pluralisme Metodologik: Metodologi Kualitatif. Dalam T. Abdullah dan M.R. Karim (Editor), Metodologi Penelitian Agama. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana. 71-81.
Nashori, F. (1996a). Agenda Masa Depan Psikologi Islami (Epilog). Dalam F. Nashori (editor), Membangun Paradigma Psikologi Islami. Yogyakarta: SIPRESS. 141-143.
Nashori, F. (1996b). Psikologi Islami, Sebuah Perspektif. Dalam F. Nashori (editor), Membangun Paradigma Psikologi Islami. Yogyakarta: SIPRESS. 91-101.
Muis, K.R. & Duffy, M.C. (2013). Epistemic Climate and Epistemic Change: Instruction Designed to Change Student’s Belief and Learning Strategies and Improve Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, No. 1, 213-225.
Najati, U. (2004). Al Qur’an dan Ilmu Jiwa. Terjemahan M.R. Usmani, Bandung: Pustaka.
Ndraha, T. (1985). Research: Teori, Metodologi, Administrasi (I). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Naqrah, T. (1971). Sikulijiah al Qasas fi al Qur’an. Al Syirkah Al Tunisiyah li Al Tauzi’.
Nawawi, H. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Quthb, S. (1967). Fi Dzilalil Qur’an (Juz VII). Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al Turats a Arabi.
Sardar, Z. (1996). Jihad Intelektual: Merumuskan Parameter-parameter Sains Islam. Terjemahan A.E. Priyono. Surabaya: Risalah Gusti.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of Beliefs About the Nature of Knowledge on Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 3, 498-504.
Shiddiqi, N. (2004). Sejarah: Pisau Bedah Ilmu Keislaman. Dalam T. Abdullah dan M.R. Karim (Editor), Metodologi Penelitian Agama. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana. 83-108.
Shtulman, A. (2013). Epistemic Similarities Between Students’ Scientific and Supernatural Beliefs. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105 No. 1. 199-212.
Surachmad, W. (1982). Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah (Dasar, Metode dan Teknik). Bandung: Tarsito.
Suriasumantri, J.S. (2001). Penelitian Ilmiah, Kefilsafatan dan Keagamaaan: Mencari Paradigma kebersamaan. Dalam M.D. Ridwan (Editor), Tradisi Baru Penelitian Agama Islam, Bandung: Penerbit Nuansa. 44-68.
Sya’ban, H.A. (1991). Silsilah Qasas Al Anbiya’: Ibrahim ‘Alaihi As salam (Juz VII). Beirut: Dar al Kutub al ‘Ilmiyah.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published on the E-Journal of Psychology website is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral right remains the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA), which means that the Journal of Psychology reserves the right to save, transmit media / format, manage in database form, , maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it continues to include the name of the Author as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and published print and electronic manuscripts are open access for any purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
Â