RELEVANSI KURIKULUM FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG DENGAN DUNIA KERJA

Mursidin mursidin, Ulfiah Ulfiah, Ening Ningsih

Abstract


Curriculum is one of the important components in education which has a big role in determining the direction and purpose that will be reached by the academic institution. Therefore, curriculum must be designed on the basis of curriculum development principles should be noticed. One of the principles is the curriculum relevance with the employment. So, to evaluate the curriculum, including psychology faculty UIN SGD Bandung, it can be conducted by scrutinizing how far the curriculum relevance with occupation.

To scrutinize how far the curriculum relevance with occupation, we can trace from alumni’s feed back. So, in this research it has been scrutinized how curriculum relevance of psychology faculty UIN SGD Bandung with the occupation taken from alumni’s view, the job appropriateness with the competence and psychology profession, and the hope of alumni to curriculum change.

The data of research are processed either qualitative approach or quantitative by descriptive statistic analyzing present age calculation, and level category and also the analysis of contingency coefficient correlation test. From the result of data processing, it shows that most of alumni view that the curriculum of psychology faculty UIN SGD Bandung is still relevant with occupation. It is strengthened by the data showing the most of alumni’s job which generally is still appropriate with the psychology profession scope. It is so with being relatively fast for the alumni to get the job after graduating. It indicates that the products (graduations) of psychology faculty UIN SGD Bandung still have any competition and they are needed by the user.

From correlation test result, it can be concluded that there is no respondent’s characteristic which has significant relation with their view to the curriculum relevance of psychology faculty UIN SGD Bandung with occupation. In other word, respondent’s characteristic can’t be a significant correlation to human’s view in curriculum.

Although Alumni view curriculum still relevant with occupation, but all respondents still hope any change in curriculum to be more applicative and relevant with human’s need especially for occupation.     


Keywords


Curriculum, work

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, Saepudin. (2003). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bisri, Cik H, dkk. Profil Alumni Fakultas Ushuluddin IAIN Tahun 1991-200. Laporan Penelitian. Bandung: Lembaga Penelitian IAIN SGD.

Djatmika, Ratna. (1998). Pelatihan Penyusunan dan Pengujian Alat Ukur Ilmu Sosial. Jatinangor: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran.

Friedenberg, Lisa. (1995). Psychological Testing: Design, Analysis, and Use. USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Fakultas Psikologi Unair. (2001). Sinopsis Hasil Diskusi/ Lokakarya Pendidikan Psikologi di Indonesia. Surabaya: Kolokium Psikologi Indonesia.

Fakultas Psikologi UIN SGD. (2007). Kurikulum Fakultas Psikologi UIN SGD, Berdasarkan Kolokium Psikologi Tahun 2007. Bandung: Gunung Djati.

Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN SGD. (2005). Panduan Teknis Kegiatan Akademik: Jurusan/Program Studi/ Diploma. Bandung : Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN SGD

Graziano, M.A.& Raulin, M.L. (2000). Methods Research: A Process of Inquiry, Fourth Edition. USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Hadi, Sutrisno. (1994). Metodology Research. Jilid 1. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset.

Hamalik, Oemar. (1986) Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Pustaka Martiana.

¬¬_____ (1995). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

_____ (2007). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kerlinger, F.N. (2004). Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral. Edisi Ketiga. (Alih Bahasa oleh Dra. Landung R. Simatupang). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Kumar, R. (1999). Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners. London: Sage Publication.

Mulyana, E. (2006). Kurikulum yang Disempurnakan: pengembangan standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, S. (1993). Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

_______ . (1995). Asas-asas Kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Neuman, W.L. (2000). Social Research Methods : Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Oliva, Peter F. (1992). Developing the Curiculum. Third Edition. New York: HarperCollins Publisher.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: teori dan praktik pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana

Schubert, W.H. (1987). Curiculum: perspective, paradigm, and Possibility. Chicago: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Shaughnessy J. & Zechmeister, Eugene B. 1994. Research Methods in Psychology, Third Edition. Singapore: McGrawHill.

Siegel, Sidney. 1997. Statistik Nonparametrik untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Terjemahan Zanzawi Suyuti & Landung Simatupang. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Subino. 1987. Konstruksi dan Analisis Tes. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Sudrajat, M. 2000. Serial Pengenalan Dasar-dasar Statistika Terapan: Statistika Sosial. Jatinangor: Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Padjadjaran.

Sukmadinata, Nana S. (2008). Pengembangan Kurikulum: teori dan praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Team Penyusun Kurikulum. (2007). Kurikulum: berdasarkan kolokium psikologi tahun 2007. Bandung: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Zais, Robert S. (1976). Curiculum: priciple and foundation. New York: Harper & Row, Publisher, Inc.

Wahana Komputer. (2002). 10 Model Penelitian dan Pengolahannya dengan SPSS 10.01. Yogyakarta: Andi




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v1i1.2114

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


web
stats

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.