Gender Differences in Extramarital Behaviors Among Couples in Long-Distance Marriages in the Digital Age: A Study in Kigali, Rwanda


Alphonse Nkurunziza(1*), Claudine Munganyinka(2)

(1) Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
(2) Department of Wellness, Wellness & Family, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigated gender differences in extramarital behaviors in long-distance marriages, with a focus on the role of digital platforms in facilitating infidelity and the impact on marital commitment and satisfaction. The rationale for the study stems from the increasing prevalence of long-distance marriages in the digital age, where technology serves as both a means of maintaining connection and a potential risk factor for infidelity. A sample of 300 participants (150 men, 150 women) in long-distance marriages was recruited. Participants completed the Extramarital Behavior Scale (EBS), the Digital Communication and Infidelity Scale (DCIS), and the Marital Commitment and Satisfaction Scale (MCSS). Results showed that men reported higher levels of physical extramarital behaviors (mean = 3.2), while women exhibited more emotional extramarital behaviors (mean = 3.8). The use of digital platforms was strongly correlated with both physical (r = .55, p < .01) and emotional extramarital behaviors (r = .50, p < .01). Lower marital commitment (B = -.30, p = .002) and satisfaction (B = -.25, p = .038) were significant predictors of increased extramarital behaviors. In conclusion, digital platforms play a critical role in infidelity among long-distance couples, with notable gender differences in behavior patterns.

Keywords


Gender differences, digital communication, extramarital behaviors, long-distance marriages

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

American Psychological Association. (2021). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 39–65). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0003

Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2020). Facebook intensity, social network support, stability and satisfaction in long-distance and geographically-close romantic relationships: A test of a mediation model. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-2-5

Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499509551804

Choy, B.K.C., & Li, N.P. (2021). Romantic/Emotional Infidelity. In A.D. Lykins (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sexuality and Gender (pp. 42-1). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_42-1

Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424

Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0424

Djamba, Y. K., & Kimuna, S. R. (2020). Racial and gender differences in extramarital sex in the United States in the last three decades. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRJSSH.3.1.03

Dunn, M. J., & Billett, G. (2017). Jealousy levels in response to infidelity-revealing Facebook messages depends on sex, type of message and message composer: Support for the evolutionary psychological perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0110-z

Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038

Fox, J., & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: Uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0232

Hackathorn, J., & Ashdown, B. K. (2022). It’s not you, it’s us: Relationship-based factors that predict infidelity. In T. DeLecce & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of infidelity (online ed.). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197502891.013.5

Hackathorn, J., & Ashdown, B. K. (2023). Relationship between satisfaction and infidelity: It’s complicated. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sexual psychology and behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08956-5_2456-1

Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2014). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203081815

March, E., Antunovic, J., Poll, A., Dye, J., & Van Doorn, G. (2024). High (in)fidelity: Gender, the Dark Tetrad, and infidelity. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39(2), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2023.2220279

Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 971–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z

Nascimento, B. S., Adair, L., & Vione, K. (2023). Pathways to online infidelity: The roles of perceived online dating success, perceived availability of alternative partners, and mate value discrepancy. Current Psychology, 43(12), 12782–12793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05345-y

Park, Y. J. (2015). Do men and women differ in privacy? Gendered privacy and (in)equality in the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.011

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051

Svensson, R., Johnson, B., & Olsson, A. (2022). Does gender matter? The association between different digital media activities and adolescent well-being. BMC Public Health, 22(273). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12670-7

Strauss, C., Harr, M. D., & Pieper, T. M. (2024). Analyzing digital communication: A comprehensive literature review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00455-8

Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2004). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.x

Weber, M., Aufenanger, S., Dreier, M., et al. (2018). Gender differences in escapist uses of sexually explicit internet material: Results from a German probability sample. Sexuality & Culture, 22(6), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9518-2




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v11i2.38942

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


web stats

View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.