The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari

Muhammad Muhammad

Abstract


Indonesia has been implementing a more in-depth decentralization system encouraging village governance since 2014. Since then, village governments have been given more autonomy on governing village funds to promote village development further. This paper aims to compare two forms of the Village (desa and nagari) in terms of the practice of village governance. This study mainly uses a qualitative descriptive method to compare the implementation of village governance in both traditional form (desa) and cultural form (nagari). With further Lowndes and Sullivan’s analytical framework of neighbourhood governance, this study suggests all types of neighbourhood governance have been practiced in both forms. Although village government type is more significant in both forms, the social rationale is more significant in nagari because of the cultural aspect. Finally, based on the comparison of both forms of Village, this paper advocates some implications in the implementation of village governance. 


Keywords


village governance, desa, nagari, neighborhood governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A. & Dharmawan, L. 2016. Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52, 161-183.

Bachtiar, P. P. 2016. Membenahi BPD untuk Memperkuat Desa [Online]. SMERU. Available: http://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/pbbenahibpd.pdf [Accessed April 21st 2017].

Lowndes, V. & Sullivan, H. 2008. How Low Can You Go? Rationales And Challenges For Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86, 53-74.

Mariana, D. 2017. Merawat Demokrasi Lokal untuk Transformasi Ekonomi Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: IRE. Available: http://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20IRE%20Merawat%20Demokrasi%20Lokal%20untuk%20Kesejahteraan_Dina%20Mariana%209052017.pdf [Accessed June 5th 2017].

Matutu, S. D. B. 2016. Mengembangkan BUMDesa untuk Transformasi Ekonomi Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: IRE. Available: https://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20IRE%20BUMDesa%2010062016%20OK.pdf [Accessed April 20th 2017].

Pill, M. & Bailey, N. 2012. Community Empowerment or a Strategy of Containment? Evaluating Neighbourhood Governance in the City of Westminster. Local Government Studies, 38, 731.

Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja In, J. 2014. Villages in Indonesia cash in on new law: Big shift in spending from cities to rural areas gives rural leaders more clout. The Straits Times, p.Newspaper Article.

Zamroni, S., Anwar, Z. & Mariana, D. 2015. Mengintegrasikan Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: Institute for Research and Empowerment. Available: https://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20Mengintegrasikan%20Perencanaan%2009012015%20FINAL%20SIAP%20CETAK-2.pdf [Accessed April 20th 2017].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v13i1.12470

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Muhammad Muhammad

 

PUBLICA: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara
Has Been Indexed on:

 

    
    
     
       

 

 

 

1th Floor, FISIP Building

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: publica@uinsgd.ac.id

 


 Publica : Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International