The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari

The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari

Authors

  • Muhammad Muhammad Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v13i1.12470

Keywords:

village governance, desa, nagari, neighborhood governance

Abstract

Indonesia has been implementing a more in-depth decentralization system encouraging village governance since 2014. Since then, village governments have been given more autonomy on governing village funds to promote village development further. This paper aims to compare two forms of the Village (desa and nagari) in terms of the practice of village governance. This study mainly uses a qualitative descriptive method to compare the implementation of village governance in both traditional form (desa) and cultural form (nagari). With further Lowndes and Sullivan’s analytical framework of neighbourhood governance, this study suggests all types of neighbourhood governance have been practiced in both forms. Although village government type is more significant in both forms, the social rationale is more significant in nagari because of the cultural aspect. Finally, based on the comparison of both forms of Village, this paper advocates some implications in the implementation of village governance. 

Author Biography

Muhammad Muhammad, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Dosen Jurusan Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, UIN Walisongo Semarang

References

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A. & Dharmawan, L. 2016. Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52, 161-183.

Bachtiar, P. P. 2016. Membenahi BPD untuk Memperkuat Desa [Online]. SMERU. Available: http://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/pbbenahibpd.pdf [Accessed April 21st 2017].

Lowndes, V. & Sullivan, H. 2008. How Low Can You Go? Rationales And Challenges For Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86, 53-74.

Mariana, D. 2017. Merawat Demokrasi Lokal untuk Transformasi Ekonomi Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: IRE. Available: http://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20IRE%20Merawat%20Demokrasi%20Lokal%20untuk%20Kesejahteraan_Dina%20Mariana%209052017.pdf [Accessed June 5th 2017].

Matutu, S. D. B. 2016. Mengembangkan BUMDesa untuk Transformasi Ekonomi Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: IRE. Available: https://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20IRE%20BUMDesa%2010062016%20OK.pdf [Accessed April 20th 2017].

Pill, M. & Bailey, N. 2012. Community Empowerment or a Strategy of Containment? Evaluating Neighbourhood Governance in the City of Westminster. Local Government Studies, 38, 731.

Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja In, J. 2014. Villages in Indonesia cash in on new law: Big shift in spending from cities to rural areas gives rural leaders more clout. The Straits Times, p.Newspaper Article.

Zamroni, S., Anwar, Z. & Mariana, D. 2015. Mengintegrasikan Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa [Online]. Yogyakarta: Institute for Research and Empowerment. Available: https://ireyogya.org/uploads/PB%20Mengintegrasikan%20Perencanaan%2009012015%20FINAL%20SIAP%20CETAK-2.pdf [Accessed April 20th 2017].

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30
Loading...