Implementation of Government Agency Performance Accountability System in Tana Tidung District Government


Deviyanti Astuti(1*), Moh Said(2), Mujibu Rahman Khairul Muluk(3)

(1) Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research is qualitative research with a case study approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate SAKIP in Taha Tidung Regency Government which obtained a fixed SAKIP value. Descriptive analysis methods are used to evaluate SAKIP components, namely Performance Planning, Performance Measurement, Performance Reporting, Performance Evaluation and Performance Achievements. The results of the study on the evaluation of SAKIP Tana Tidung Regency show that the targeted accountability value has not increased significantly, tends to experience a slowdown, there are main problems that cause unsuccess, namely: a) performance as OPD has not been outcome oriented, and the performance indicators set have not fully met measurable, relevant, and reliable criteria, this affects the implementation Value for Money, and cascading of these achievements become less relevant and reliable; b) has not integrated the planning, management, and evaluation system in building performance management so as to describe the working relationship between work units / PD that is effective and efficient to produce the resulting performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, B. (2015). Sistem Pengawasan Keuangan Negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusaka Negara.

Armstrong, M. (2017) Armstrong’s Handbook of Performance Management: An Evidence-Based Guide to Delivering High Performance (Google eBook). Available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=wtwS9VG-p4IC&pgis=1.

Armstrong, M., Baron, A. (1998) Performance Management-The New Realities. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

Arens, A.A., James L. L. (2008). Auditing Pendekatan Terpadu, Terjemahan oleh Amir Abadi Yusuf, Buku Dua, Edisi Indonesia, Salemba Empat

Atkinson, R. (1997). Pengantar Psikologi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Andarmoyo, Sulistyo. 2012. Psikoseksual dalam pendekatan Konsep & Proses Keperawatan. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz media

Berman, E., Moghrabi-Hijal, I. (2023) Performance and Innovation in the Public Sector: Managing For Result. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. In Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540

Danar, O.R. (2022) Manajemen Kinerja: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., Gray, D., & Neely, A.D. (2007). Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 784-801.

Febiani, I., Irianto, G., Purwanti, L. (2016). Determinan Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1).

Jurnali, T., Nabiha, S.A. (2015). Performance management system for local government: the indonesian experience. Global Business Review. 16(3), 351–363

KemenPANRB (2008) Pelaporan Kinerja dan Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Available at: https://perpus.menpan.go.id/uploaded_files/temporary/DigitalCollection/ZjQ0YWVhMGJjMGRmNThjYzMwYWM3NTkxYjU0MTJiNThjYzBlN2NlNg==.pdf.

Lebas, M.J. (1995) Performance Measurement and Performance Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41, 23-35.

Mardiasmo. (2022). Perwujudan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Good Governance.

Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah. 2 (1): 1-17

Moynihan, D.P. Pandey, S.K. (2007). The Ties that Bind: Social Networks, Person-Organization Fit and Turnover Intention. La Follette.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.

March, J. G., Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John wiley & sons.

Neely. (2004). Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Nunhes, T., Bernardo, M., Oliveira, O. (2019). Guiding principles of integrated management systems: Towards unifying a starting point for researchers and practitioners. Journal of Cleaner Production. 210. 977-993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.066

Sholihah, A., Handayani, A. R., Igamaliga, I., Alamsyah, S., Sakinah, S. (2022). Efektivitas Program Germas Dalam Peningkatan Status Kesehatan Masyarakat Melalui Sosialisasi Germas. Jurnal Pustaka Keperawatan, 1(2).

Tangkilisan, H.N.S. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Birokrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pembaharuan Administrasi Publik Indonesia dan Lukman Offset.

Umar, H. (1999). Riset Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Organisasi. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Walker, R.M., Damanpour, F. and Devece, C.A. (2010) Management Innovation and Organizational Performance The Mediating Effect of Performance Management.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v15i3.30981

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Deviyanti Astuti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

PUBLICA: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara
Has Been Indexed on:

  Harvard Library  
    
     
    

 

 

 

1st Floor, FISIP Building, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

A.H. Nasution Street No. 105 Cibiru, Bandung, 40614

E-mail: publica@uinsgd.ac.id

 


 Publica : Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International