The SWOT AHP Analysis of Mitra Utama Kepabeanan Policy in Directorate General of Customs and Excise

The SWOT AHP Analysis of Mitra Utama Kepabeanan Policy in Directorate General of Customs and Excise

Authors

  • Destiko Teguh Rinaldi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Arianis Chan Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v14i1.16617

Keywords:

Policy, Customs, Main Partner, SWOT, AHP

Abstract

The Mitra Utama (MITA) Kepabeanan Policy implemented in the Directorate General of Customs and Excise aims to reduce logistics costs in order to improve Indonesia's economic competitiveness, as well as give appreciation to compliant importers and exporters. However, the implementation of the policy has not been optimal because of the high logistics costs, and lagging ranking of Indonesia's Logistic Performance Index in the Southeast Asia region, as well as policies that have not been able to reduce the overall dwell time for imported goods. Recommendations for improving policy performance will be drawn up using a mixed method of exploratory sequential models. Qualitative data collection techniques are carried out through literature studies, observations, interviews, while quantitative data collected through questionnaire filling. Qualitative data analysis uses a hierarchical linear approach, while quantitative data analysis uses a combined method of SWOT and AHP. Policy recommendations will be selected based on the highest-score strategy. Based on the results of the study, the strength factor is considered the most important thing of this policy. The main recommendation is encouraging the integration of risks between government agencies involved in the import and export process.

References

Anderson, J. E. (2003). Public policymaking: An Introduction (5th ed.). Boston, Houghton Mifflin.

Arvis, J.F., Ojala, L, Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018 Trade Logistics in the Global Economy The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. The World Bank.

Birkland, T. A. (2015). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making. New York, Routledge.

Bottero, M., D’Alpaos, C., & Marello, A. (2020). An application of the SWOT analysis for the management of cultural heritage assets: The case of the historical farmhouses in the aglie castle (Turin). Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (3). Avalable from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031071.

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid dan Rianayati Kusmini Pancasari. Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, SAGE.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis an Integrated Approach (6th ed.). New York, Routledge.

Dye, T. R. 2013. Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juízo, D. (2011). Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: An A’WOT analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36(14–15), 1103–1111. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.040.

Gani, A. (2017). The Logistics Performance Effect in International Trade. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 279–288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.012.

Goepel, K. D. (2013). Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Corporate Enterprises – a New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs. In: International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23-16 Juni 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2013.047.

Görener, A., Toker, K., & Uluçay, K. (2012). Application of Combined SWOT and AHP: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525–1534. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1139.

Hammadi, L., Souza De Cursi, E., Barbu, V. S., Ouahman, A. A., & Ibourk, A. (2018). A SCOR Model for Customs Supply Chain Process Design. World Customs Journal 12 (2), 95-106.

Kangas, J., Pesonen, M., Kurttila, M., & Kajanus, M. (2001). A’WOT: Integrating The AHP With SWOT Analysis. In: 6th ISAHP 2001, Berne, Switzerland, 2-4 August 2001. pp. 189-198.

Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1, 41–52.

Liu, L., & Yue, C. (2013). Investigating The Impacts of Time Delays on Trade. Food Policy, 39, 108–114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.001.

Özmen, Ö., Demir, A., & Celepli, M. (2013). An Analysis of Iraq’s Pre-import Inspection, Testing & Certification Program: A’WOT Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 85–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.474.

Patton, C. v., Sawicki, D. S., & Clark, J. J. (2016). Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning. New York, Routledge.

Pesonen, M., Kurttila, M., Kangas, J., Kajanus, M., & Heinonen, P. (2001). Assessing the Priorities Using A’WOT Among Resource Management Strategies at the Finnish Forest and Park Service. Forest Science, 47(4), 534–541.

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston, Springer US.

Start, D., & Hovland, I. (2004). Tools for Policy Impact: A Handbook for Researchers. London, Research and Policy in Development Programme.

Şeker, Ş., & Özgürler, M. (2012). Analysis of the Turkish Consumer Electronics Firm using SWOT-AHP Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1544–1554. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1141.

Shrestha, R. K., Alavalapati, J. R. R., & Kalmbacher, R. S. (2004). Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: An application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems, 81(3), 185–199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.09.004.

Sudiono, S., Sutjahyo, S. H., Wijayanto, N., Hidayat, P., & Kurniawan, R. (2019). The Analysis on The Formulation of Integrated Pest Management Policy Strategy by Using Swot-AHP Method (A Case Study on Vegetable Plant Cultivation in Lampung Province). Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology, 3(2), 239–256. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32530/jaast.v3i2.119.

Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS Matrix-A Tool for Situational Analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): Pemikiran Administrasi Negara 3

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).