Animal Waste Policy Innovation

Animal Waste Policy Innovation

Authors

  • Lia Muliawaty Universitas Pasundan
  • Nyi Raden Ruyani Universitas Pasundan
  • Cecep Nana Nasuha Universitas Islam Al-Ihya Kuningan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v17i1.46427

Keywords:

Policy innovation, animal waste, waste management, collaboration, kuningan regency

Abstract

Animal waste management in Kuningan Regency, especially in Cipari Village, faces serious challenges in the form of environmental pollution, low awareness of livestock farmers, and suboptimal existing policies. This study aims to analyze innovations in animal waste management policies with a participatory and collaborative approach. The method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews, document studies, and field observations. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of policy innovations based on three main principles, namely creation of interactive value, distributed co-creation, and mass collaboration, has encouraged multi-party involvement in overcoming waste problems. The findings show real collaboration between livestock farmers, local governments, academics, and the private sector, which results in the practice of processing waste into organic fertilizer and biogas. However, implementation is still hampered by the lack of incentives, technological infrastructure, and coordination between institutions. Therefore, the strategy for increasing policy effectiveness is directed at institutional integration, ongoing education, incentives for small farmers, and strengthening waste management cooperatives. This study provides a conceptual contribution to collaborative and practical governance for the development of environmentally friendly agriculture.

References

Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Journal of Public Policy, 6(1/2), 156–173.

D'Agaro, E., Rosa, F., & Akentieva, N. P. (2022). New technology tools and life cycle analysis (LCA) applied to a sustainable livestock production. The EuroBiotech Journal, 5(3), 130–137.

Hambali, E., Mujdalipah, S., Halomoan, T., Pattiwiri, W., & Hendroko, R. (2007). Teknologi bioenergi. Agromedia.

Humas BRIN. (2024, September 12). BRIN kembangkan teknologi inovatif pengelolaan limbah ternak untuk dukung kebersihan DAS Citarum. BRIN. https://www.brin.go.id/news/120615/brin-kembangkan-teknologi-inovatif-pengelolaan-limbah-ternak-untuk-dukung-kebersihan-das-citarum

Jandris Sky. (2024). Penyegar udara dari kotoran sapi: Inovasi ramah lingkungan karya anak bangsa. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/jandris_sky/670ba6b0ed6415196c4bb9d3

Kabupaten Kuningan. (2014). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kuningan Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah.

Kabupaten Kuningan. (2022). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kuningan Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 tentang Pembangunan Pangan Daerah.

Kardiat, Y. (2022). Inovasi administrasi publik. Public Administrative Innovation, 4(2).

Lin, H., Jiao, H., Lin, H., & Xu, X. (2025). The evolution of policies for the resource utilization of livestock manure in China. Agriculture, 15(2), 153.

Mira, A. D. P., Soputan, J. E. M., & Paruntu, C. P. (2016). Feses ternak sapi sebagai penghasil biogas (beef cattle feces as producing biogas). Jurnal LPPM Bidang Sains dan Teknologi, 3(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lppmsains/article/download/15201/14762

Moore, M. H. (2025). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.

Muchlis, D., & Nurcholis. (2018). Sustainable livestock development in the border of Merauke region based on environment. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 03010.

Navarro, F. M. (2016). From government innovation to public innovation. International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 2(6). http://oreilly.com

Nur, M., Fitriani, A., Usulu, E. M., & Mahasdhani, A. J. (2024). Inovasi dalam administrasi publik.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD Publishing.

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A systematic review of the literature. Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–642.

Pratiwi, D. B. (2024). Inovasi PP-PBL ITB, jadikan limbah kotoran sapi bernilai ekonomi bagi warga. ITB. https://itb.ac.id/berita/inovasi-pp-pbl-itb-jadikan-limbah-kotoran-sapi-bernilai-ekonomi-bagi-warga/60934

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

Pusat Inovasi Tata Pemerintahan Deputi Inovasi Administrasi Negara. (2014). Handbook administrasi negara. Lembaga Administrasi Negara Pusat Intan – Dian – LAN.

Safaria, A. F., & Yulianti, R. (2023). Kebijakan keterbukaan informasi publik (UU KIP): Implementasi paradigma new public governance (NPG)?

Salam, M., Zheng, L., Shi, D., Huaili, Z., Vambol, V., Chia, S. Y., ... & Ullah, E. (2023). Exploring insect-based technology for waste management and livestock feeding in selected South and East Asian countries. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 32, 103260.

Tim PKM-M Stikes Banyuwangi. (2019, June 28). Inovasi pengolahan kotoran sapi – Tim PKMM. Stikes Banyuwangi. https://stikesbanyuwangi.ac.id/inovasi-pengolahan-kotoran-sapi-tim-pkmm/

Torfing, J., & Ferlie, E. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy and Politics, 49(2), 283–300.

Solehudin, A., & Solehudin, S. (2024). The provision of human resources support for the purpose of enhancing economic growth through digital innovation in the processing of animal manure in Karyamulya Village, Karawang. In Z. B. Pambuko et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science (BISHSS) (pp. 545–558). Atlantis Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...