Netizens' Responses to Theological Content on Social Media: A Case Study of Dondy Tan

Authors

  • Gerry Ismail Anrivika UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rifki Rosyad UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/socio-politica.v16i1.49796

Keywords:

apologetics, mediatization, social media, theological content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the rapid development of digital communication, which has had a significant impact on social interaction patterns, including in the realm of da'wah (Islamic outreach), which is now often conducted online. One interesting figure to study is Dondy Tan, a content creator who actively uses YouTube to deliver da'wah. The content he presents not only conveys moral and religious messages but also often touches on fundamental theological issues, such as understanding divinity, interpreting holy books, and studying the history of religious development. The main focus of this research is to analyze how Dondy Tan constructs the argumentation flow in each of his da'wah content, as well as to examine how the audience, especially the netizen community, responds to and interprets the messages conveyed. This research uses a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach. The primary data source is Dondy Tan's da'wah videos uploaded to his YouTube channel, which are then analyzed using Fairclough's discourse analysis framework. Furthermore, netizen comments in the discussion column are also studied, especially comments that generate a lot of responses, replies, and debate. The intense interaction in the comment space reflects the dynamics of digital communication and the construction of meaning for the da'wah messages conveyed.

References

Abdullah, M. Q. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Dakwah [Introduction to the Science of Da’wah] (Qiara Media (ed.)). CV Qiara Media.

Arifin, M. Z., Sudirman, S., & Rahardi, R. (2023). Struktur Argumentasi Mahasiswa dalam Pembuktian Sifat Ketertutupan Suatu Grup [Student Argumentation Structure in Proving the Closed Nature of a Group]. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2703–2714. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2534 [In Indonesian]

Aristotle, G. A. K. (2007). Aristotle : On Rhetoric A Theory of Civic Discourse (Vol. 16). Oxford University Press.

Ashari, M. F., Dova, M. K., & Jaya, C. K. (2024). Komunikasi Dakwah Kultural di Era Digital [Cultural Preaching Communication in the Digital Era]. Journal of Da’wah, 3(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.32939/jd.v3i2.4423 [In Indonesian]

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence : Science and Practice. Pearson Education. https://archive.org/details/influencescience0000cial_k6u1/page/n9/mode/2up.

Dong, S. (2024). A Study on Video Thumbnails Design Attributes and Their Influence to the Outcome of the Video. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 41(1), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/41/20240778

Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2005). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.

Einsle, C.-S., Escalera-Izquierdo, G., & García-Fernández, J. (2023). Social media hook sports events: a systematic review of engagement. Communication & Society, 36(3), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.3.133-151

Fakhruroji, M. (2021). Mediatisasi Agama: Konsep, Kasus, dan Implikasi [Mediatization of Religion: Concepts, Cases, and Implications] (LeKKas (ed.)). LeKKaS.

Finnegan, J. (1964). Handbook of Biblical Chronology; Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Princeton University Press.

Goncearenco, A., Shaytan, A. K., Shoemaker, B. A., & Panchenko, A. R. (2015). Structural Perspectives on the Evolutionary Expansion of Unique Protein-Protein Binding Sites. Biophysical Journal, 109(6), 1295–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.056

Herring, S. C. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer - Mediated Discourse. Discourse, 1, 1–37,. http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761/index_html.

Hu, Y. (2021). Preference or Controversy: What Predicts Virality Most? Proceedings of ‏The 4th International Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2. https://doi.org/10.33422/4th.icrhs.2021.05.45

Kadri. (2022). Komunikasi Manusia (Sejarah, Konsep, Politik) [Human Communication (History, Concepts, Politics)] (A. Bahauddin (ed.)). Alamtara Institute.

Karyaningsih, P. D. (2018). Ilmu Komunikasi [Communication Studies] (Alviana (ed.)). Samudra Biru.

Khan, M. L. (2017). Social Media Engagement: What Motivates User Participation and Consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024

Kholili, M., Izudin, A., & Hakim, M. L. (2024). Islamic Proselytizing in Digital Religion in Indonesia: The Challenges of Broadcasting Regulation. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357460

Loewenstein, G. (2007). The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation. In Exotic Preferences (Vol. 116, Nomor 1, hal. 121–177). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199257072.003.0006

Poudel, D., Agarwal, N., & Cakmak, C. (2026). Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. In I.-H. Ting, P. Karampelas, M.-Y. Day, & R. Alhajj (Ed.), The 16th International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM (Nomor August). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85240-4

Purba, B. (2020). Ilmu Komunikasi: Sebuah Pengantar [Communication Science: An Introduction] (J. Simarmata (ed.)). Yayan Kita Menulis. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=YkwCEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&ots=eDsIrVdb0d&sig=g_TLZYYGmxykb7xJjfivS7jiAn8.

Rahayu, D., Utama, L. K., Muqaddimah, A. R., Ayuni, D., & Utami, A. M. (2024). The Influence of Hook Copywriting and Social Media Content Toward Brand Awareness, Brand Image, and Purchase Decisions in MSMEs in Sleman District. Telaah Bisnis, 25(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.35917/tb.v25i1.504

Rigotti, E. (2011). Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Argumentation, 25(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9202-2

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif [Educational Research Methods Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches]. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, M. P. K. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif [Qualitative Research Methods] (1st ed.). Alfabeta Bandung.

Sunarto, A. (2014). Retorika Dakwah (Petunjuk Menuju Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpidato) [Preaching Rhetoric (Guidelines for Improving Public Speaking Skills)]. In Jaudar Press.

Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

Citation Check