ZIKIR HENING SUFI DALAM ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/saq.v4i2.7308

Abstract

The Sufis are practitioners of the science of purification of heart. Sufism is the esoteric or inner dimension of Islam. Sufism can’t to be explained theoretically, it can only be understood through participation and practice. The activities of the ritual dhikr of Sufi have signs and meanings. The Sign of systems include words, movements, pictures, numbers, and objects. These signs have meaning to convey. The Signs have denotative and connotative of meanings.This article uses a descriptive analysis method. We analyze discursive and non-discursive symbols, is words that involve emotions and non-verbal meanings such as Sufi body movements in ritual prayers and dhikr. Dhikr “silence†is a command to observe silence which is the purpose of dhikr silent. The purpose of this article is to open the essence of Sufi and semiotics of tasawwuf as the deepest spiritual teachings of the Prophet Muhammad in achieving of silence of “qolbu mu’min Baitullahâ€

References

Aavani, Gholamreza. (2004). Glorification of The Prophet Muhammad in the Poems of Sa'adi. p.4 https://www.scribd.com/document/132479284/Glorification-of-the-Prophet-Muhammad-PBUH-in-the-Poems-of-SHAIKH-Sa-Adi.

Abu Hamid Al-Ghazzali (1980). Ihya’ ‘Ulumuddin. Bayrut: Dar al-Ma’rifath.

Al-Mukhtasor, (1439 H). Al-Markaz Liddirosaatil Qur’aniyyah: Al-Mukhtasor fi Tafsiiril Qur’anil Kariim/ Tasnip : Jama’atin min Ulama’ it Tafsiir. / Nukhbah minal ulama’. Thob’ah. 4. Riyadh. Bab: 20.

Al-Mukhtasor, (1439 H). Al-Markaz Liddirosaatil Qur’aniyyah: Al-Mukhtasor fi Tafsiiril Qur’anil Kariim/ Tasnip : Jama’atin min Ulama’ it Tafsiir. / Nukhbah minal ulama’. Thob’ah. 4. Riyadh. Bab: 50.

Al-Mukhtasor, (1439 H). Al-Markaz Liddirosaatil Qur’aniyyah: Al-Mukhtasor fi Tafsiiril Qur’anil Kariim/ Tasnip : Jama’atin min Ulama’ it Tafsiir. / Nukhbah minal ulama’. Thob’ah. 4. Riyadh. Bab: 17.

Al-Mukhtasor, (1439 H). Al-Markaz Liddirosaatil Qur’aniyyah: Al-Mukhtasor fi Tafsiiril Qur’anil Kariim/ Tasnip : Jama’atin min Ulama’ it Tafsiir. / Nukhbah minal ulama’. Thob’ah. 4. Riyadh. Bab; Fadho’il Qur’an.

Al-Mukhtasor, (1439 H). Al-Markaz Liddirosaatil Qur’aniyyah: Al-Mukhtasor fi Tafsiiril Qur’anil Kariim/ Tasnip : Jama’atin min Ulama’ it Tafsiir. / Nukhbah minal ulama’. Thob’ah. 4. Riyadh.

Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Baqarah: 29

Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Isro: 72.

Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Qof: 19.

Al-Qur’an Surah At-Thalaq: 10-11.

Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Fathu: 10.

Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Qiyamah: 14

Anjum, Tanvir. (2016). “Silencing of Chisti Sufism in the National Narrative in Pakistanâ€. Journal of Asian Civilizations Islamabad. 39 (2): 147-165. https://www.academia.edu/35465003/Silencing_of_Chishti_Sufism_in_the_National_Narrative_in_Pakistan_Journal_of_Asian_Civilizations_Islamabad._Vol._39_No._2_December_2016.

Brown, Jonathan A.C. (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications.

Burckhardt, Titus. (2009). Art of Islam: Language and Meaning. Bloomington: World Wisdom.

Chittick, William C. (1995). “. In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Saussure, F. (1916). Nature of the Linguistic Sign. Course in General Linguistics.

Dewey, John. (1946). “Peirce's Theory of Linguistic Signs, Thought, and Meaningâ€. The Journal of Philosophy. 43 (4), 85-95.

Eprint, (1906). “Rolegomena To an Apology For Pragmaticismâ€. The Monist. XVI (4), 492-546.

Eprint, Arisbe. (1868). “Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man". Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 2, 103-114.

Ernst, Carl W. (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Muhammad, Mu?ammad as the Pole of Existence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harris, Roy. (1984). “The Semiology of textualizationâ€. Language Science. 6 (2). 271-286.

Hawting, G. R.. (2002). The First Dynasty of Islam: The Umayyad Caliphate. United Kingdom: Routledge.

Huang, Sheng-Cheng, (2006) A semiotic view of information: Semiotics as a foundation of LIS research in information behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology banner. 43 (1), 1-7.

Huda, Qamar-ul. (2003). Striving for Divine Union: Spiritual Exercises for Suhrawardi Sufis. United Kingdom: Routledge.

Kabbani, Muhammad Hisham. (2004). Classical Islam and the Naqshbandi Sufi Tradition. Islamic Supreme Council of America. 557-645.

Kurnianto, Ery Agus (2015) Analisis Tiga Tataran Aspek Semiotik Tzvetan Todorov Pada Cerpen’’Pemintal Kegelapan’’ Karya Intan Paramaditha. Jurnal KANDAI. 11 (2): 206-216

Langer, Susanne K. (1942). Philosophy In A New Key. A Study In The Symbolism Of

Reason, Rite, and Art. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. page. 1357-1386).

Lings, Martin. (2005). What is Sufism? Lahore: Suhail Academy.

Locke, John. (1951). “John Locke: Philosophy and Political Theoryâ€. American Political Science Review, 45 (2): 386-399.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/john-locke-philosophy-and-political-theory/3851BBA68F07AE4CA4AD5E9B8195E761.

Mick, David Glen. (1986). “Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significanceâ€. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (2), 196-213.

Monelle, R. (1991). “Music and the Peircean Trichotomiesâ€. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music. 22 (1), 99-108.

Morris, Charles. (1987). Charles Morris and the Behavioral Foundations of Semiotics. In: Krampen M., Oehler K., Posner R., Sebeok T.A., von Uexküll T. (eds) Classics of Semiotics. Topics in Contemporary Semiotics. Boston: Springer.

Munawwir, Ahmad Warson.(1997). Al-Munawwir Kamus Arab-Indonesia. Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif.

Munn, Richard C. 1969. “Reviewed work(s): The Sufis by Idries Shahâ€. Journal of the American Oriental Society. American Oriental Society. 89 (1): 279–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/598339?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. (2007). The Essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr, ed. William C. Chittick Bloomington: World Wisdom.

Palmquist, Stephen. (2006). “Silence as the Ultimate Fulfillment of the Philosophical Questâ€, Journal Hekmat Va Falsafeh, (Journal of Wisdom and Philosophy).

https://www.academia.edu/200408/Silence_as_the_Ultimate_Fulfillment_of_the_Philosophical_Quest.

Peirce, Sanders Charles. (2002). The Peirce Seminar Papers. Essays in Semiotics Analysis. Volume. V. New York: Berghahn Books.

Pierce, Sanders Charles. (1958). State of Vermont V. Carroll B. Pierce. Supreme Court of Vermont. Bennington.

Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. (2004). “Grice in the wake of Peirceâ€. Journal Pragmatics & Condition. 12 (2), 295-315.

Posner, R. (1987) Charles Morris and the Behavioral Foundations of Semiotics. In:

Krampen M., Oehler K., Posner R., Sebeok T.A., von Uexküll T. (eds) Classics of Semiotics. Topics in Contemporary Semiotics. Springer, Boston, MA.

Quasi-mind’. Term in M. Bergman & S. Paavola (Eds.), The Commens Dictionary: Peirce's Terms in His Own Words. New Edition. Retrieved from http://www.commens.org/dictionary/term/quasi-mind, diakses tanggal: 26.08.2019.

Sutasoma, (1952) Kitab Rahasia Bainal Haq. 12. Tidak diterbitkan.

Shah, Idries. (1970). The Boook of The Way of the Sufi. New York: Dutton. Stjernholm.

Whiting, Robert. (1991). Religions for Today. London: Stanley Thomes, p. viii).

Winarsih Suko, (2013). “Representasi Bahasa dalam Pertarungan Simbolik dan Kekuasaanâ€. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia. 5 (1), 11-24

Downloads

Published

2020-02-12