Submissions

1. Title. The title should be short, clear, and informative, but does not exceed 20 words. It has to be pinpoint with the issues discussed. The article title does not contain any uncommon abbreviations. The main ideas should be written first and followed by its explanations.
2. Author's names and institutions. The author's names should be accompanied by the author's institutions, institutions address, and email addresses, without any academic titles and job title.
3. Abstract. Abstracts is written in a single paragraph of about 250 words maximum. For research articles, abstracts should give a pertinent overview of the work. We strongly encourage authors to use the following style of structured abstracts, but without headings: (1) Background: Place the question addressed in a broad context and highlight the purpose of the study; (2) Purpose of the Study: Identify the purpose and objective of the study; (3) Methods: Describe briefly the main methods or theoretical framework applied; (4) Results: Summarise the article's main findings; and (5) Conclusions: Indicate the main conclusions or interpretations.
4. Keywords. List three to five pertinent keywords specific to the article; yet reasonably common within the subject discipline; use lower case except for names
5. Introduction. The introduction begins with an explanation of the social facts or research problems that are relevant, covering aspects such as social, religious, economic, political, environmental issues, or others, which underline the importance of this study. The phenomenon being investigated has significant impacts, thus requiring attention and further research. In this context, the research problem becomes highly urgent, with an emphasis on the difference between the existing reality (Das Sein) and the desired state (Das Sollen), which creates space for solutions or efforts to address the problem. This issue requires a more in-depth explanation to identify and suggest possible measures that can be taken for improvement. Next, this section also discusses the relationship with the existing literature, namely previous studies in the same field, and how this study differentiates itself. This research reveals a gap in the existing literature, creating novelty or originality, which is the main reason why this study needs to be conducted. This research gap will significantly contribute to a better understanding and advancement of knowledge in this field. The primary aim of this research is to address the research problem by providing solutions or clearer insights. In one paragraph, the research objective must be explained clearly and concisely so that readers can immediately understand the goals of the study. The main argument of this research is that [insert main argument here], which serves as the foundation for why this study is important. Thus, this research aims to provide a tangible contribution to solving the problem at hand.
6. Method. This research begins with the selection of the research object, which is relevant to the problem being addressed. The selection of the object, which includes [mention the research object, such as a place, case, event, or phenomenon], is made with the consideration that this object provides deep insights into the phenomenon being studied. This selection is also based on its relevance to the social, political, or economic context that is the focus of the research. Thus, the chosen object has a significant impact and direct relevance to the research problem that needs to be answered. This study uses a [qualitative/quantitative/mixed-methods] research approach, with data collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data is obtained through [mention data collection methods, such as interviews, observations, surveys], which allows the researcher to gather direct information from relevant sources. Secondary data is obtained through [such as literature reviews, previous research reports, or public data], which provides background and a deeper understanding of the research problem. The research process is carried out in several systematic stages. The first stage begins with [mention the first stage, such as literature review, problem identification, etc.]. Next, data collection is carried out using [mention data collection techniques, such as in-depth interviews, surveys, observations, etc.]. These data collection techniques are chosen to ensure the quality and validity of the obtained data, as well as its relevance to the research problem. Once the data is collected, the next step is data processing and analysis. The collected data is processed using [mention data analysis techniques, such as data reduction, categorization, or coding] to facilitate the identification of patterns or themes that emerge from the data. The analysis is carried out using a [qualitative/quantitative] approach to provide a deeper understanding of the phenomenon being studied and to answer the research questions in a comprehensive and systematic manner.
7. Results. In this section, the author must describe the data obtained, whether it is field research results, informant biographies, general location descriptions, or other elements relevant to the research. This description must be clear and comprehensive so that the reader can understand the context and background of the findings. For example, if the research is conducted in the field, the author should provide a clear description of the place or situation being studied. After the data description, the author should provide a deeper explanation of the data. This explanation involves analysis and interpretation of what is contained in the data presented. The author must be able to narratively explain why the data is relevant and how it shows specific patterns or trends. The author needs to demonstrate how the data obtained relates to the research topic being discussed. Does the data answer the research question posed earlier? To what extent does this data provide new understanding or insights into the research topic? The author should link the presented data to the theoretical framework or research objectives. To strengthen the findings, the author must include supporting evidence that is relevant, such as interview results, statistics, images, models, tables, and so on. These pieces of evidence provide a stronger foundation for the data previously explained and help clarify the findings presented. Each piece of evidence should be explained in a relevant and easy-to-understand manner.

Discussion: The discussion is highlighted through the title and subtitles of the section when needed

In this section, the author needs to develop a deep discussion regarding the research findings that have been obtained. The discussion begins with a reflection on the results: "What does the result of this research signify?" The author should relate the research findings to broader social phenomena or relevant theories that can help interpret the findings. For example, the author can analyze the research results using established social or sociological theories, such as those from prominent theorists and their books. In this case, the author will demonstrate how existing theories support or contradict the research findings. Next, the author must answer the question "SO WHAT?", which refers to the implications of the research findings. What practical and theoretical impacts can be drawn from these findings? Does this research provide new insights that could influence policy, practices, or understanding in a broader social context? The author should emphasize the significance of these findings in a larger context and connect them with relevant societal issues. Then, the author should address the "WHY?" question by analyzing the reasons why the research findings exhibit the patterns or results observed. What factors influenced these outcomes, in terms of the theories applied, the variables studied, or the social-political conditions present at the time of the research? The author should provide a deep explanation of the causes behind the findings, both internal to the research itself and external, influenced by broader conditions. Finally, the author must answer "NOW WHAT?", which focuses on the steps that have been taken or need to be taken by the material objects of the research or the institutions involved with the research subject. What actions have been taken in response to these findings? Have any efforts or policies been implemented by the relevant parties based on these results? Or does this research push for further actions or changes that need to be made by the stakeholders involved in the study?

8. Conclusions. In the conclusion section, the author needs to summarize the key findings of the research, including any novelty or new contributions discovered in this study. The main findings that differentiate this research from previous studies should be clearly explained, highlighting the aspects that contribute new insights to the field. The author should explain how this research provides a new understanding or a more innovative approach to the topic being studied. Additionally, the author must highlight the added value of the research, which is the contribution made by the study. This contribution could be in the form of new concepts, theories, or methods that were developed during the research process. The author should emphasize the importance of this contribution and how it could influence the advancement of knowledge or practice in the field. Although this research provides significant results, the author must also mention the limitations of the study. These limitations may relate to methodology, sampling, or the context of the research that affects the generalization of the results. The author should suggest directions for future research to expand understanding of the issues being studied or to address the limitations identified. Future research directions should provide deeper insights and open opportunities for further studies that can enrich the field.

9. Acknowledgments. In this section, you can acknowledge any support given, which is not covered by the author's contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

10. Conflicts of Interest. Declare conflicts of interest or state. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interests that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results.

11. References. The literature listed in the References contains only the sources referenced or included in the article. We recommend preparing the references with a bibliography software package, such as Mendeley to avoid typing mistakes and duplicated references. Referral sources should provide 80% of journal articles, proceedings, or research results from the last five years. Writing techniques bibliography, using the system cites APA (American Psychological Association) Style and the 7th edition.