nfn Engkus


The factors of ecology are still problem in public administration implementation, at the least, there are 5 (five) ecological factors: economic,social structure, communication net work,pattern of  ideololgy/symbol, and political system.It’s thought to have been caused by fifth factors  not done optimally yet. The aim of the research for understanding that ecologically,the fifth factors influence in public administration.At the least, understanding that public administration is not only one stand, but influenced by ecological factors where public administration in a place, and also in local autonomy implementation policy, regency/municipality, ecologically to explore resources, either human resources or nature resources relate with administrative ecolology. The methodology use are qualitative, the first to library study, and study of factual comparative complately, with central issue in the beaucracy, especially in Indonesia. The study of ecological administrationhas been done along ago, and the top at 1960 decade with established Comparative Administration Group (CAG) by Fred Riggs as a leader. The conclusion of  the writer that study of administrative ecology have been relevantly until now and important to reasearch  continously.

Kata Kunci

Public Administration, Administrative Ecological Factors, Resources

Article metrics

Abstract views : 172 | PDF views : 117


Teks Lengkap:



Abdurrachman, 1987. Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Media Sarana Press. Lind, L. R. Economic Man in Ancient Athens. The Classical Journal,Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 27-38 Boayke-Sarpong, Kwame. 1996. Bureaucracy and Development in the emerging Nation: An Ecological Approach. Research Review,Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-15 Chapman, Richard A. 1996. Prismatic Theory in Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future. Public Administration Quarterly, Fall, pp. 343-363. Pamudji. 1993. Ekilogi Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Pruessner, A. H. 1920. Date Culture in Ancient Babylonia. The American Journal of Semitic Language and literatures, Vol.36, No. 3, pp. 213-232. Riggs, Fred W. 1980. Public Administration Review, MarchApril, pp. 107-115. Schmandt-Besserat, Danise. 1981. Decipherment of the Earliest Tablets. Science, New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4479, pp. 283-285.

Singh, Amita. 2005. Indian Administratif Theory: Context and Epistemology. Administrative Theory & Praxis Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.51-80. Tummala, Krishna K. Tummala. 2000. An Essay on Comparative Administration. Public Administration Riview , Vol. 60, No. 1. Division for public Economics and Public Administration Departement of Economic and Social Affairs Persatuan Bangsa-Bangsa (1997). Rethinking Public Administration: an Overview. Weisman, Martin. 1993. The Ecology of Strategic management in Small Local Government. Public Administration Quarterly, Summer, pp. 145159. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

dulkiah, m. (2016). Pemanfataan Media Dalam Memahami Realitas Sosial Di Kalangan Mahasiswa UIN SGD Bandung. JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 1(1), 12-23. doi:


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


P - ISSN : 2303-3169

E - ISSN : 2579-3098

JISPO is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.>


Published by : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Flag Counter


View My Stats