Retraction and Correction

KUBIK: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Matematika is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes the importance of addressing errors, ethical concerns, and research misconduct in published articles through transparent and responsible editorial procedures.

This policy is guided by the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), particularly its guidelines on retractions, corrections, and expressions of concern.

1. Manuscript Withdrawal and Refund Policy

Authors are strongly discouraged from withdrawing manuscripts once they have entered the editorial or publication process, including peer review, revision, copyediting, proofreading, or layout preparation.

Authors who wish to withdraw their manuscripts must submit a formal written request to the editorial office, clearly stating the reasons for withdrawal.

The following refund policies apply:

  1. Editorial Rejection (Decline Submission): If a manuscript receives an official Decline Submission decision from the editorial team, including decisions made following the peer review process, all fees paid by the authors will be fully refunded (100%).

  2. Author-Initiated Withdrawal: If authors voluntarily withdraw their manuscripts after submission, any fees already paid are non-refundable, regardless of the stage of the editorial or publication process.

  3. Withdrawal Confirmation: Authors must obtain formal confirmation from the editorial office before considering their manuscripts officially withdrawn.

Authors must not submit the same manuscript to another journal while it remains under consideration by KUBIK.

This policy aims to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in manuscript handling and publication fee management.

2. Article Retraction

KUBIK may retract a published article when substantial evidence indicates that its findings, conclusions, or publication process are seriously compromised.

Editors may consider retracting an article under the following circumstances:

  1. There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable due to major errors, incorrect mathematical calculations, invalid proofs, computational errors, data fabrication, or falsification.

  2. The article contains plagiarism or substantial unattributed reproduction of previously published work.

  3. The findings have been published previously without proper acknowledgment, disclosure, permission, or legitimate justification.

  4. The article contains unauthorized data, copyrighted material, or other content used without appropriate permission.

  5. The publication involves serious legal or ethical violations, including copyright infringement or breaches of confidentiality.

  6. The research was conducted or reported in violation of applicable ethical standards.

  7. The article was accepted or published through a compromised, fraudulent, or manipulated peer-review process.

  8. Significant undisclosed conflicts of interest have materially affected the interpretation, evaluation, or conclusions of the research.

Retraction decisions are made by the editorial team following a fair assessment of the available evidence and, where appropriate, consultation with the authors, reviewers, institutions, or other relevant parties.

3. Retraction Notices

When an article is retracted, KUBIK will publish a formal retraction notice to maintain transparency and preserve the integrity of the scholarly record.

Retraction notices should:

  1. Be clearly identified as a Retraction.

  2. Clearly identify the affected article, including its title, authors, and publication details.

  3. Be linked to the original article wherever technically possible.

  4. Be published promptly once the retraction decision has been established.

  5. Be freely accessible to all readers.

  6. Identify the party responsible for initiating or issuing the retraction.

  7. Clearly explain the reasons for the retraction.

  8. Present factual and objective information without defamatory or inflammatory language.

Retracted articles will generally remain accessible in the journal's online archive, clearly marked as Retracted, to preserve the scholarly record. Removal of article content may be considered only in exceptional circumstances involving legal requirements, privacy, or other serious risks.

4. Circumstances Where Retraction May Not Be Appropriate

Retraction is generally not necessary when:

  1. An authorship dispute exists, but the validity and reliability of the research findings remain unaffected.

  2. The main findings remain reliable, and identified errors can be adequately addressed through a correction.

  3. Available evidence is inconclusive, and further investigation is required before a final decision can be made.

  4. A previously undisclosed conflict of interest is identified, but it does not materially affect the findings, interpretations, or editorial decision.

In such circumstances, the editorial team may consider issuing a correction, an expression of concern, or taking other appropriate editorial actions.

5. Expression of Concern

KUBIK may publish an Expression of Concern when significant questions arise regarding the integrity or reliability of a published article but insufficient evidence is available to justify an immediate retraction.

An expression of concern may be considered when:

  1. There is inconclusive evidence of research or publication misconduct.

  2. Serious concerns about the reliability of the findings cannot be adequately investigated.

  3. An investigation into suspected misconduct is unlikely to be fair, impartial, or conclusive.

  4. An investigation is ongoing, and a final determination is not expected within a reasonable timeframe.

An expression of concern will be clearly identified, linked to the relevant article, and updated when additional information becomes available.

6. Article Corrections

KUBIK may issue a formal correction when errors are identified in a published article but the overall findings and conclusions remain reliable.

Corrections may be issued in the following circumstances:

  1. Errors in mathematical notation, equations, calculations, tables, figures, or references that do not invalidate the main conclusions.

  2. Minor inaccuracies in research methods, data presentation, or interpretation that require clarification.

  3. Incorrect or incomplete author information, affiliations, acknowledgments, or contributor statements.

  4. Other unintentional errors that may affect the clarity, accuracy, or interpretation of the published work without substantially compromising its scientific validity.

Corrections will be published transparently and linked to the original article wherever possible.

If an identified error substantially undermines the reliability of the article's findings or conclusions, the editorial team will consider whether retraction is more appropriate.

7. Investigation and Editorial Decisions

Reports of potential errors, ethical violations, or publication misconduct may be submitted by authors, reviewers, readers, institutions, or other concerned parties.

The editorial team will assess reported concerns according to the following general procedures:

  1. Conduct an initial assessment of the reported issue.

  2. Review relevant evidence and supporting documentation.

  3. Request clarification or responses from the authors when appropriate.

  4. Consult independent experts or relevant institutions when necessary.

  5. Determine whether a correction, expression of concern, retraction, or other editorial action is warranted.

  6. Communicate the editorial decision and publish an appropriate notice when required.

All investigations will be conducted fairly, objectively, and confidentially, with due consideration of the available evidence and the rights of the parties involved.

8. Post-Publication Discussion

8.1 Post-Publication Comments and Scientific Discussion

Readers, researchers, and members of the academic community may submit comments, questions, or scientific critiques concerning articles published in KUBIK.

Post-publication discussions may address:

  1. The validity and accuracy of mathematical definitions, theorems, proofs, models, or computational results.

  2. The appropriateness of research methodologies and analytical procedures.

  3. The interpretation, reproducibility, or reliability of published findings.

  4. Potential errors, inconsistencies, or limitations identified after publication.

  5. Relevant scientific developments that may contribute to further discussion of the published research.

All comments and critiques should be objective, constructive, academically relevant, and supported by appropriate scientific reasoning.

8.2 Submission of Comments and Concerns

Post-publication comments, scientific discussions, or concerns may be submitted to the KUBIK editorial office through the contact information provided on the journal's official Contact page.

Submissions should clearly identify the relevant article, including its title, authors, publication details, and DOI or URL, where available.

Contributors are encouraged to provide a clear explanation of the issues raised, supported by relevant evidence, references, mathematical arguments, or computational results.

8.3 Editorial Assessment and Author Response

The editorial team will assess submitted comments and concerns to determine their scientific relevance, validity, and significance.

Where appropriate, the editorial team may:

  1. Request additional clarification or supporting evidence from the contributor.

  2. Invite the original authors to respond to the comments or concerns.

  3. Consult independent experts or reviewers when further scientific evaluation is necessary.

  4. Facilitate constructive communication between the parties involved.

  5. Determine whether further editorial action is required.

Authors are encouraged to respond professionally and provide appropriate explanations, corrections, or supporting evidence when legitimate scientific concerns are raised.

8.4 Publication of Comments and Responses

When scientifically relevant and appropriate, KUBIK may publish post-publication comments, author responses, or editorial notices to promote transparency and constructive scholarly discussion.

The publication of such materials is subject to editorial assessment and approval.

Published discussions should be clearly linked to the original article whenever technically possible.

The editorial team reserves the right to decline comments containing personal attacks, unsupported allegations, discriminatory statements, or content unrelated to the scientific discussion.

8.5 Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions

If post-publication discussions reveal significant errors, unreliable findings, or potential research misconduct, the editorial team will evaluate the concerns in accordance with the journal's Publication Ethics and Retraction and Correction Policy.

Depending on the nature and severity of the issue, appropriate editorial actions may include:

  • Publication of corrections or clarifications.

  • Publication of an expression of concern.

  • Retraction of an article when justified by substantial evidence.

  • Referral of suspected research misconduct to relevant institutions or authorities when necessary.

Editorial actions will be based on objective evaluation and applicable publication ethics guidelines.

8.6 Commitment to Scholarly Integrity

KUBIK encourages responsible post-publication discussion as an essential part of scholarly communication and the continuous evaluation of scientific knowledge.

The journal is committed to ensuring that scientific discussions are conducted fairly, transparently, and respectfully while protecting the integrity of the scholarly record.

9. Commitment to Publication Integrity

KUBIK is committed to maintaining a transparent, accurate, and trustworthy scholarly record.

The journal follows relevant COPE guidance when addressing publication errors, ethical concerns, and research misconduct.

For further information, please refer to the journal's Publication Ethics, Plagiarism Screening Policy, and Author Guidelines.