Beyond the Presidential Threshold: How Cebong and Kampret Political Identities Shape Social Media Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v5i2.25337Keywords:
Policy, Presidential Threshold, Politic, Indonesian PoliticsAbstract
The polemic regarding the Presidential Threshold policy has caused conflict in society and hampered Indonesia's political development. This study aims to prove the impact of the Presidential Threshold policy on the political identity of two groups of people who are often referred to as "cebong" and "kampret". The impact of this policy has led to polarization of netizens and heated and uncontrolled communication patterns on social media. This study uses the netnographic method with a critical discourse approach to determine the impact of the policy. The results showed that the Presidential Threshold policy had an impact on the inconsistency of political parties, there were only 2 pairs of candidates in the presidential election, injured small parties because of oligarchic efforts, many negative comments were hostile on social media and researchers found Presidential Threshold policies gave birth to a Political Identity "cebong- kampret, which can cause the Indonesian nation to experience segregation which creates conflict in society and of course triggers national disgrace on social media. With the existence of a Presidential Threshold policy, the government must consider the presentation of 20%, this can reduce the polarization that exists in society.
References
Ahmadi, D., & Nuraini, A. (2005). Nickname Theory. Mediator: Communication Journal, 6(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v6i2.1209
Ambarwati, S. D. (2020). Reconstruction of the Presidential Threshold System in the Electoral System in Indonesia (Comparative Study of Indonesian and Brazilian Presidential Threshold Systems). Rewang Rancang: Journal of Law Lex Generalis, 1(5), 77–91.
Anggara, V. (2019). Dynamics of the Presidential Threshold in the Presidential System in Indonesia Dynamics of the Presidential Threshold in the Presidential System in Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 5(September), 17–36.
Ansori, L. (2017). Study of the Presidential Threshold in the 2019 Simultaneous Elections. Jurnal Yuridis, Vol.4.
Ardipandanto, A. (2020). The Impact of Identity Politics in the 2019 Presidential Election: A Populism Perspective [The Impact of Identity Politics On President Election 2019: Populism Perspective]. Journal Politica Dynamics of Domestic Political Problems and International Relations, 11(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v11i1.1582
Armia, M. S., Nafrizal, M. Deni Fitriadi, & Iqbal Maulana. (2016). Elimination of the Presidential Threshold as an Effort to Restore Constitutional Rights. Petita: Journal of Law and Sharia Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v1i2.83
Arsil, F. (2017). Indonesia Through Convenient Elections And Presidential Threshold. 211–238.
Basri, M. (2015). Hukum demokrasi dalam islam. Suhuf, 27(1), 1–21
Diniyanto, A. (2018). Measuring the Impact of Implementing the Presidential Threshold in the 2019 Concurrent Elections. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 1(1), 87–88. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/islrev/article/view/26941
Djayadi Hanan. (2017). Strengthening Multiparty Presidentialism in Indonesia: Simultaneous Elections, Electoral Systems, and Party Systems. Paramadina University Journal, 13(0), 1451–1475. http://journal.paramadina.ac.id/index.php/upm/article/view/111
Evelina, L. W. (2019). Community is the Message: A Virtual Netnography Study on the TripAdvisor Travel Site. Warta ISKI, 1(02), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.25008/wartaiski.v1i02.19
Faradina, Q., Mahanani, I., & Marintan, M. A. (2022). Islam dan politik di indonesia ( Perspektif Sejarah ). Al-Isnad: Journal of Islamic Civilization History and Humanities, 3.1, 1–199.
Fitri, A., & Setiadi, W. (2022). Presidential Threshold in Simultaneous General Elections: The Setback of Constitutional Democracy? Indonesian Legislation, 19, 68–82. https://kumparan.com/
Ghoffar, A. (2018). Presidential Threshold Problems: Constitutional Court Decisions and Experience in Other Countries. Constitutional Journal, 15(3), 480. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532
Hamid, A., Darwis, D., & Andriyani, S. (2018). Cebong and Kampret Political Phenomena in Indonesia: An Analysis from the Perspective of Political Thought in Islam. Politea, 1(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.21043/politea.v1i1.4320
Hidayat, E. (2018). Oligarchy Political Practices and Mobilization of Power Resources in the Pilkades of Sitimerto Village in 2016. Social Political Journal, 4(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v4i2.6795
Junaidi, M., & Indah, D. N. (2020). Pemilihan Presiden Ideal Melalui Demokrasi Kerakyatan Berdasarkan Nilai – Nilai Keislaman. Law and Justice, 5(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v5i1.10781
Kami, I. M. (2017). Passed, These are 5 Crucial Issues in the Election Law. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3568067/sudah-disahkanini-5-isu-krusial-di-uu-pemilu
Kartiko, G. (2009). Electoral System in the Perspective of Democracy in Indonesia. Constitutional Journal, II(No.1), 1–171.
Kulavuz-onal, D., & Vásquez, C. (2013). Ethnography and Education Reconceptualising fieldwork in a netnography of an online community of English language teachers. December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.792511
Lati praja delmana. (2020). Problems and Strategies for Handling Money Politics in the 2019 Simultaneous General Elections in Indonesia. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 1(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v1i2.61
Lugosi, P., Quinton, S., Quinton, S., Lugosi, P., & Quinton, S. (2018). Machine Translated by Google Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran. 1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1431303
Mayang Indriany Risna Biru. (2020). Community Participation in the 2019 Election in Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Government Science EJournal, 8(2), 545–558.
Muamar, J. (2022). Instagram as a Communication Medium for Parents' Risks to Children During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Netnographic Study of Virtual Parenting Communities. Development Communication Journal, 20(01), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.46937/20202238987
Munawarman, A., & Novita, A. (2022). Analysis of the Presidential Threshold in the Interests of the Oligarchy. Jurnal Rechten : Legal And Human Rights Research,3(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v3i2.40
Mustofa, A. (2014). The Role of Mass Media as a Means of Advertising Political Parties (Study of the Case of Surya Paloh and the Nasdem Party) Ali Mustofa. Jurnal Interaksi, 2(1), 62–69.
Restiyani, & Isharyanto. (2020). Presidential Threshold Anomaly in the Presidential System in Indonesia. Anomali Presidential Threshold... Res Publica, 4(3), 303–316.
Robert. (2010). Netnography - Doing Ethnographic Research Online.
Sandra, G. (2020). These Are 48 Countries In The World That Do Not Implement "Presidential Threshold."https://www.berdikarionline.com/ here's-48-countries-in-the-world-that-did-not-implement-presidentialthreshold/
Santoso, R. (2019). The Role of the Election Commission and Political Parties in Realizing Democracy with Integrity. Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(02), 2–9.
Shobron, S. (2013). Prospek partai islam ideologis di indonesia. Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(1), 9–24. DOI: 10.23917/profetika.v14i1.2004.
Sinamora, J. (2019). Welcoming the Simultaneous Election Regime. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 3(4), 1–18.
Sultoni Fikri. (2019). Constitutional Problems Of The Presidential Threshold In Indonesia. 7(1), 9–25.
Sumodiningrat, A. (2021). Reviewing Presidential Threshold Provisions in the Election of President and Vice President in Indonesia. Journal of Law Reform Studies, 1(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i1.23349
Sunarso, A. W. A. dan. (2020). Presidential Threshold impact. Journal of Citizenship Education and Law, Volume 9 N, 461–476.
Tazri, M. (2019). The Politics of Blasphemy in the Indonesian Political Communication System (Phenomenological Study of Cebong-Kampret). Jurnal Communiverse (CMV), 4(2), 9–15.
Teguh Santoso Gobel, R. (2019). Re-conceptualizing the Presidential Threshold in Concurrent Election. Jambura Law Review, 1(No. 1), 94–119. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/09/18/23255461/effendighazali-ajukan-
Villegas, D. (2018). From the self to the screen : a journey guide for autonetnography in online communities auto-netnography in online communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1443970
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.jpg)
