ASAS KEADILAN SEBAGAI SALAH SATU LANDASAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN


Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti(1*), Diana Farid(2), Sofyan Mei Utama(3), Otong Syuhada(4), Hendriana Hendriana(5)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
(2) STAI Darul Arqam Muhammadiyah Garut, Indonesia
(3) Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the role of the principle of justice as one of the foundations for judges in deciding divorce decisions. In the context of family law, divorce is a complex issue that affects the lives of many individuals. Therefore, it is important for judges to consider various aspects, including the principle of justice, in making fair and just decisions. The research method uses a qualitative approach with the method of analyzing literature and literature studies. Data will be collected from various sources, including books, scientific journals, laws and regulations, court decisions, and other related documents. Data analysis will be carried out by identifying the main themes related to the principle of justice in divorce decisions. The results of the study show that the principle of justice has a very important role in deciding divorce decisions. The principle of justice provides a basis for judges in assessing various factors related to divorce, such as the rights of spouses, children's welfare, distribution of joint assets, and financial obligations. In addition, the Judge must be fair in considering the interests and needs of each partner, as well as the rights of the children involved. In this case, the judge must consider factors such as income, role in marriage, ownership of property, and physical and mental health conditions. In conclusion, the principle of justice plays an important role in deciding on a divorce decision. Judges must consider various factors and principles of justice in ensuring a fair decision for all parties involved. This research makes an important contribution to our understanding of the principle of justice in the context of family law, and provides useful guidance for judges in making fair decisions in divorce.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran asas keadilan sebagai salah satu landasan bagi hakim dalam memutuskan putusan perceraian. Dalam konteks hukum keluarga, perceraian merupakan masalah kompleks yang mempengaruhi kehidupan banyak individu. Oleh karena itu, penting bagi hakim untuk mempertimbangkan berbagai aspek, termasuk asas keadilan, dalam membuat keputusan yang adil dan berkeadilan. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis literatur dan studi kepustakaan. Data akan dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber, termasuk buku, jurnal ilmiah, peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan dokumen-dokumen terkait lainnya. Analisis data akan dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi tema-tema utama yang berkaitan dengan asas keadilan dalam putusan perceraian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas keadilan memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam memutuskan putusan perceraian. Asas keadilan memberikan landasan bagi hakim dalam menilai berbagai faktor yang terkait dengan perceraian, seperti hak-hak pasangan, kesejahteraan anak, pembagian harta bersama, dan kewajiban finansial. Selain itu, Hakim harus adil dalam mempertimbangkan kepentingan dan kebutuhan masing-masing pasangan, serta hak-hak anak yang terlibat. Dalam hal ini, hakim harus mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor seperti penghasilan, peran dalam pernikahan, kepemilikan harta, dan kondisi kesehatan fisik dan mental. kesimpulannya, asas keadilan memainkan peran penting dalam memutuskan putusan perceraian. Hakim harus mempertimbangkan berbagai faktor dan prinsip keadilan dalam memastikan keputusan yang adil bagi semua pihak yang terlibat. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pemahaman kita tentang asas keadilan dalam konteks hukum keluarga, dan memberikan panduan yang bermanfaat bagi hakim dalam membuat keputusan yang adil dalam perceraian.


Keywords


Principle of Justice, Principle of justice, Law enforcement.

Full Text:

PDF XML

References


Abdullah, Boedi. “Hukum Wakaf Benda Bergerak (Uang) Menurut Fatwa Ulama Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 Tentang Wakaf.” Asy-Syari‘ah 20, no. 1 (2018): 1–14.

American Bar Association. (2019). The Role of the Judge in Divorce Cases. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/judge-role/. diakses 3 Juli 2023.

Khairuddin, Khairuddin. “Alasan Perceraian Luar Pengadilan Dan Akibatnya Bagi Masyarakat Desa Sanggaberu Kecamatan Gunung Meriah Aceh Singkil.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam) 5, no. 1 (2022): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v5i1.9356.

Cohen, G. A. (1988). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906-944.

Coltrane, S. (2004). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 1200-1217.

Damayanti, R. (2018). Asas Keadilan dalam Putusan Perceraian. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 5(1), 63-74.

Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.

Farid, D., Pakarti, M. H. A., Fathiah, I., Hendriana, H., & Nu'man, M. H. (2023). Marriage and Divorce Practices in the Society of Bandung: Contestation of Islamic and State Law. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 10(1), 65-78.

Fineman, M. A. (2004). The vulnerabilities of fairness: The domestic relations court and the need for an integrated approach to gender justice. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 6(1), 1-30.

Fineman, M. A. (Ed.). (2008). The public nature of private violence: The discovery of domestic abuse. New York, NY: Routledge.

Folberg, J., Milne, A., & Salem, P. (Eds.). (2004). Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Hadi, P. S. (2019). Asas Keadilan dalam Penetapan Hak Asuh Anak pada Perceraian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Semarang No. 1173/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Sm). Jurnal Hukum Argentum, 1(2), 195-208.

Hamzah, Andi. (2018). Keadilan Sosial dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.

Kerry, Whigham. “‘Affective Echoes: Affect, Resonant Violence, and the Processing of Collective Trauma in Post-Genocidal Societies.’” Disertasi, New York University, 2016.

Kepmenkumham. (2016). Peran Hakim dalam Proses Perceraian. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia. https://jdih.kemenkumham.go.id/produk_hukum/view/53%20th%202016%20kmk%20tata%20cara%20proses%20perceraian.html. diakses 3 Juli 2023.

LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-160). Springer.

Law Reform Commission of Canada. (2015). The Role of the Judge in Family Court. http://www.ulcc.ca/en/annual-meetings/372-1994-fredericton-new-brunswick/1423-the-role-of-the-judge-in-family-court-1994. diakses 3 Juli 2023.

Makmur, M. (2020). Asas Keadilan dalam Putusan Perceraian menurut Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Jurnal Hukum Lex Respublica, 7(2), 183-197.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2015). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (2002). Restorative justice theory validation. In C. Alder & J. Wundersitz (Eds.), Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism? (pp. 23-35). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.

Noguchi, K., & Gelman, S. R. (2019). Divorce in the United States. In Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution (pp. 19-32). Routledge.

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.

Pakarti, M. H. A., Farid, D., & Fathiah, I. (2023). Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Pernikahan Beda Agama: Studi tentang Stereotip, Prasangka, dan Dukungan Sosial dalam Konteks Multireligius. el-Bait: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(2).

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Roach, K. (2010). Retributive Justice. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/justice-retributive/. diakses 3 Juli 2023.

Saragih, S. R. (2018). Asas Keadilan dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Putusan Perceraian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan No. 98/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Med). Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 2(2), 111-127.

Setyawati, R. (2017). Asas Keadilan Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Pada Putusan Cerai (Studi Putusan No. 498/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Bks). Jurnal Hukum Yuridika, 3(2), 275-289.

Suhendro, E. (2020). Asas Keadilan dalam Penetapan Nafkah Setelah Perceraian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jember No. 1491/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Jem). Jurnal Hukum Magistra, 2(1), 89-102.

Simanjuntak, Payaman J. (2011). Pembaharuan Hukum Perdata Nasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2010). Pokok-pokok Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sudikno, Muhadi. (2012). Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30(1), 283-357.

Wallerstein, J. S., Lewis, J. M., & Blakeslee, S. (2000). The unexpected legacy of divorce: A 25-year landmark study. Hyperion.

Whitehead, B. D. (1997). The divorce culture: Rethinking our commitments to marriage and family. Vintage.

Williams, S. K., & Foshee, V. A. (2010). Community disadvantage and intimate partner violence trajectories among young couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 866-883.

Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (UU Perkawinan).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v4i2.25998

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam index by:

   

 

 

Program Studi Hukum Keluarga (Ahwal Syakhsiyyah)
Fakultas Syariah Hukum, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Jln. AH. Nasution No. 105 Bandung 40614
Telp/Fax. 022-7802278, E-mail: as.fsh@uinsgd.ac.id.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats