The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and English Enlish Proficiency of EFL Students in Papua
Keywords:
Language Learning Strategies, EFL learning, Proficiency, PerformanceAbstract
Having plenty evidence about the effect of various factors on Language learning strategies (LLSs) use in hand, the present study aimed at describing strategies students prefer to use in English as a foreign language (EFL) learning and find out whether the strategies have correlation to their English proficiency. 32 EFL sophomores participated in this study. The main instrument was the Oxford’s SILL test version 7.0. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software. Significant correlations at the level of 0.05 were found between (0.006 < 0.05), Compensation Strategies (0.021 < 0.05), and Social Strategies (0.021 < 0.05). In contrast, Memory Strategies, Cognitive Strategies, and Affective Strategies were not significantly correlated to English proficiency. This result provides area for future research to seek the effect of LLSs to students’ academic performance.
References
Barnard, Roger & Li, Jinrui Eds. 2016. Language Learner Autonomy: Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in
Asian Context. Phnom Penh: Ankor Thom Printer Co, LTD.
Burns, Anne. & Richards, Jack C. The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language
Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, Ann. 2014. Classroon Action Research and Teacher Development. In Widodo, Handoyo Puji and Zakarias, Nugraheny T. Eds. 2014:89-98. Recent Isuues in English Language Education. Indonesia:UNS Press
Chamot, Anna U. and Lisa Kupper. 1989. Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign
Language Annals 22.1: 13-22.
Griffith, Carol. 2008. Lessons from Good Language Learners. United Kingdom: Cambridge University
Press.
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Michael H. Long. 1991. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition
Research. New York, NY: Longman.
O’Malley, J. Michael and Anna U. Chamot. 1990. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. Michael, Anna U. Chamot and C. Walker. 1987. Some applications of cognitive theory to
second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9.3: 287-306.
Oxford, Rebecca. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Oxford, Rebecca. 1992. Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL
Journal 2.2: 18–22.
Oxford, Rebecca and Judy A. Burry-Stock. 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System
1: 1-23.
Oxford, Rebecca and Martha Nyikos. 1989. Variable affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73.3: 291-300.
Oxford, Rebecca, Roberta Lavine, Gregory Felkins, Mary E. Hollaway and Amany Saleh. 1996. Tellingtheir stories: Language students use diaries and recollection. Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Rebecca Oxford, 19-34. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
                LETTER OF COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENTAs an author of BELTIC Journal of English Education Department UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. I, who sign below:
Declare:
1. My paper is authentic; my own writing and it has not been published/proposed on any other journals and publication.
2. My paper is not plagiarism but my original idea/research.
3. My paper is not written by other help, except with Board of Editors and Reviewers recommendation who have been chosen by this journal.
4. In my paper, there are no other writings or opinions except referred in the bibliography and relevant to the rule of writing in this journal.
5. I give all my copyright of this paper to this journal include the right for managing and publication.
6. I make this assignment surely. If there are distortion and untruth in this assignment, later, I will take responsibility as the current law.