The Dilemma of Checks and Balances, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Independence in Indonesia

Authors

  • Chinta Cintia UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Rivan Padma Negara UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Nisrina Faraas UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Keywords:

Checks and Balances, Constitutional Amendment, Human Rights Protection, Judicial Independence, Rule of Law

Abstract

The 1998 post-reform amendments to the 1945 Constitution marked a new era in the development of the rule of law in Indonesia, with an emphasis on the separation of powers, the protection of human rights, and the independence of the judiciary. However, more than two decades later, the implementation of this vision is still faced with various structural and practical challenges. This article critically evaluates the effectiveness of state institutional arrangements, particularly the trias politica, in maintaining checks and balances of power and accountability between the executive, legislative and judicial branches. In addition, it discusses the extent to which human rights guarantees explicitly stated in the constitution have been realized through laws and daily law enforcement, including the gap between ideal norms and field realities that often disadvantage vulnerable citizens. Finally, the article reveals the main obstacles in realizing the rule of law, such as political interference with the judiciary and the lack of autonomy of judges, which impede a fair and independent judiciary. Through an analysis of constitutional documents, empirical cases, and current literature, the study concludes that while the legal foundations are strong, systemic dilemmas such as institutional corruption and weak oversight are major impediments. Recommendations include further reforms to strengthen accountability mechanisms and public legal education, in order to realize a truly inclusive and sustainable rule of law.

References

Hadji, K., Anjani, A. B. R., Rizky, A. M., Pangestu, D. A., Basuki, R. M., & Caniago, V. A. (2024). Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. PRIMER : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(3), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.55681/primer.v2i3.339

Hermoyo, B. (2011). Implementasi Perubahan Uud 1945 Dan Paradigma Baru. Jurnal Wacana Hukum, 10(1), 89–104. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/23506-ID-implementasi-perubahan-uud-1945-dan-paradigma-baru.pdf

Lestari, E. P., & Risnain, M. (2020). Evaluasi Norma Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Konstitusi Dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Kerangka Negara Hukum Demokratis. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2633

Marta Pigome. (2011). Implementasi Prinsip Demokrasi dan Nomokrasi dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan RI Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(2), 335–348. https://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/viewFile/191/139

Rini T, dkk, 2020. (2020). Jurnal Riset Ilmiah. Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(01), 15–18.

Setiawan, I. (2024). Pengawasan pemerintahan dalam ulasan teori dan praktek. CV. Rtujuh Media Printing.

Siti Kotijah Fatmawati. (2019). Urgensi Penguatan Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Majelis, 09, 52.

Tarigan, R. S. (2024). Reformasi hukum tata negara: Menuju keadilan dan keseimbangan. Ruang Berkarya.

Tidak, D., Hukum, T., Negara, T., Hukum, F., Krisnadwipayana, U., & Belakang, A. L. (2020). Fungsi Legislasi Dpr Pasca Amandemen Uud Nkri 1945. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.468

Wasti, N. A. F. dan R. M. (2023). Politik Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(6), 6126–6134.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Chinta Cintia, Rivan Padma Negara, & Nisrina Faraas. (2025). The Dilemma of Checks and Balances, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Independence in Indonesia. Candidate: Jurnal Sains Politik, 3(2), 199–221. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/candidate/article/view/53056