A Comparative Study of Exegesis in Al-Munir Fi Al-Aqidah Wa Al-Syari’ah Wa Al-Manhaj and Tafsir Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an Regarding Leadership Verses


Asep Amar Permana(1*), Eni Zulaiha(2)

(1) School for Staff and Leadership of Indonesian Police Education and Training Institution, Bandung, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this writing is to explore the school of exegesis and the comparative interpretation of leadership verses in Al-Munir Fi Al-Aqidah Wa Al-Syari’ah Wa Al-Manhaj and Tafsir Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an. The research method employed in this writing is qualitative and analytical-descriptive. The initial step in this research is to trace the Quranic verses related to leadership in both exegeses. Then, a comparison is made between their interpretations, and the differences in their exegesis schools are analyzed. It was found in this study that the exegesis school of Al-Munir Fi Al-Aqidah Wa Al-Syari’ah Wa Al-Manhaj tends towards the Sunnah interpretation, using the tahlili method, employing a combined approach of exegesis between bi al-ma’tsur and bi ar-ra’y which has a literary, social, and fiqh-oriented interpretation style. Meanwhile, Tafsir Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an represents the Shia interpretation, utilizing the tahlili method and heavily relying on its sources, which have a theological or philosophical orientation. In interpreting leadership verses in both exegeses, the author found one such verse in Surah An-Nisa [4]: 58-59, which is one of the Sunnah leadership verses regarding trustworthiness in leadership, and in Surah Al-Maidah [5]: 67, which is one of the well-known Shia leadership verses concerning propagation.

Keywords


comparative interpretation; leadership verses; school of qur'anic exegesis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Araji, Z. J., Syed Ahmad, S. S., Al-Lamy, H. A., Al-Salihi, M. W., Al-Shami, S. A., Mohammed, H., & Al-Taweel, M. H. (2019). Truth Discovery Using the TrustChecker Algorithm on Online Quran Tafseer. Intelligent and Interactive Computing: Proceedings of IIC 2018, 71–80.

Al-Farmawi, A. al-H. (1988). al-Bidayah fi Tafsir. Dar al Fikr.

Al-Qattan, M., & Mudzakir, A. S. (2016). Studi ilmu-ilmu Quran.

Al-Thabathaba’i, M. H. (1997). al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Muassasah al-A’lami li al-Mathbua’t.

Al-Zuḥailī, W. (1998). Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al- ‘Aqīdah wa al-Sharī’ah wa al-Manhaj. Dār al-Fikr.

Alif, M. (2009). Analisis al-Munāsabah Fi Al-Qur’ān:(Antara Orientasi I ‘jāz dan Orientasi Wihdah). Al-Fath, 3(2), 128–135.

Amin, S. (2015). The scholarly evaluation of Ahadith in superiority of Sura Alkahf in Tafseer Ma’arif ul Quran by Mufti Shafi. VFAST Transactions on Islamic Research, 3(1), 29–36.

Anwar, C., & Hamid, A. (2022). Tafsir Riwayah dan Dirayah sebagai Mazhab dalam Tafsir. Al-Mirah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 21–33.

Badmus, S. S., & OlajumokeSHO, O. Omoto. (2023). An Examination of Aishah Abd al-Rahman bint al-Shati’s Approach to Exegesis of The Quran. Jurnal Usuluddin, 51(2), 147–170.

Bayyinah, I. (2020). Madzhab Tafsir Nusantara: Analisis Tafsir Al Quran Al Majid Al Nur Karya M. hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 21(2), 263–275.

Embong, A. H., Rahman, A. H. A., Kadir, F. K. A., Salamun, H., Khairuldin, W., Shahrani, S. S., & Karim, M. R. A. (2022). A research design based on the framework of tafseer al-fiqhiy (quranic juristic commentary). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(2), 391.

Ghazali, P. L., Jaaffar, S. A. S., Foziah, N. H. M., Tambi, A. M. A., Nawi, F. A. M., Mamat, M., Mohammad, S. B., Daud, W. M. N. W., & Mahmud, M. S. (2019). The construction of a new mathematical model for islamic home financing. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24, 33–41.

Goldziher, I. (2003). Mazhab tafsîr: dari Aliran Klasik hingga Modern, terj. Oleh M. Alaika Salamullah, Saifydin Zuhri Dan Badrus Syamsul Fata, Cet, 1.

Hassan, G. S., Mohammad, S. K., & Alwan, F. M. (2015). Categorization of ‘Holy Quran-Tafseer’using K-nearest neighbor algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Appl, 129(12), 1–6.

Husain, A. L., Nisthar, T., & Husam, M. S. M. (2017). Comparative study of Tafseer “Al-Quraniya Sinthanai” between other Tafseers.

Leo, S. (2013). Kiat Jitu Menulis Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Mubarok, M. F., & Barkia, Z. R. (2021). Metode Tafsir Maudhu’i (Tawhidi) dan Langkah-Langkah Menurut Pandangan Ayatullah Muhammad Baqir Shadr. In E. Zulaiha & M. T. Rahman (Eds.), Makna dan Manfaat Tafsir Maudhu’i (pp. 72–92). Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Munster, A. (2008). ‘Let there be no compulsion in religion’: Tafsir comparison on the verse 2: 256. Evangelical Quarterly: An International Review of Bible and Theology, 80(3), 255–267.

Najib, A. M. (2020). Reestablishing Indonesian Madhhab ’Urf and the contribution of intellectualism1. Al-Jami’ah, 58(1), 171–208. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2020.581.171-208

Naseri Karimvand, A., Akbarnezhad, M., & Mohammadi, R. (2023). Allameh Tabataba’i’s Fiqh-al-Hadith Approach towards al-Kafi Narratives in Tafsir al-Mizan. Quranic Science Studies, 5(1), 96–128.

Osman, A. (2019). The Qurʾan and the Hadith as sources of Islamic law. In Routledge Handbook of Islamic Law (pp. 127–140). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753881-8

Rohman, A. (2019). Tafseer Verses of Diversity. Proceeding: Faqih Asy’ari Islamic Institute International Conference (FAI3C), 1.

Rosyadi, S. (2019). Model Nalar Burhânî dalam Madzhab Tafsir Teologi Mu’tazilah. Al-Fath, 13(1), 19–39.

Sari, M. (2018). Tafsir Tahlili wa Akhowatuhu. Banten: UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin.

Shihab, M. Q. (2007). Membumikan al-Qur’an. Mizan.

Sidek, H. M., Ismail, S., Said, N. S. M., Behak, F. P., Baharun, H., Ramli, S., Abd Aziz, M. A., Ismail, N. A., & Suraini, M. A. T. (2017). An analysis of taqwa in the Holy Quran: Surah al-Baqarah. IJASOS-International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 3(8), 401–406.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukron, M. (2018). Tafsir Wahbah Al-Zuhaili Analisi Pendekatan, Metodologi, dan Corak Tafsir Al-Munir terhadap Ayat Poligami”. Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Kemanusiaan.

Syam, I. K., Alfathah, S., Zulaiha, E., & Ahmad, K. (2023). Kajian Historis Tafsir Falsafi. Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 6(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v6i1.18321

Taufiq, W., Suryana, A., & Rahman, T. (2020). Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Israiliyyat Dalam Al-Qur‟ an Dan Tafsirnya, ed. by Eni Zulaiha. Prodi P2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Ullah, A., & Siddique, M. A. (2022). Trend of" Summary of Quran" in Qur’anic Tafseer and Interpretation: Principles and Rules. VFAST Transactions on Islamic Research, 10(2), 199–211.

Warraq, I. (2010). The origins of the Koran: classic essays on Islam’s holy book. Prometheus Books.

Yunus, B. M., Jamil, S., & Rahman, T. (2020). Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Mutasyabihat Dalam Kitab Shafwah Al-Tafasir, ed. by Eni Zulaiha and MT Rahman. Prodi P2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v7i1.34216

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Asep Amar Permana, Eni Zulaiha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License..

___

View MyStat View MyStat

Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama is Indexed By: