Da'wah Policy Controversy: A Case Study of Discourse on Standardization and Certification of Da'i in Indonesia


Umdatul Hasanah(1*), Nur Asia Tawang(2)

(1) UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper aims to analyze the controversy regarding the discourse of standardization and certification of da'i in Indonesia to increase the competence and qualifications of da'i. The research was conducted through a qualitative approach with data sourced from observations and documentation of media texts in the mass media and information from interviews. The study results show that differences in authority, interests, ideology and the da'wah market have become forces that structure different views and meanings on the discourse of the standardization and certification of preacher's programs. Differences in meaning have consequences for the occurrence of tug-of-war and other patterns in the standardization and accreditation of preachers in Indonesia. The differences in authority, interests, and ideologies in the component of authority holders have become critical differentiating factors in interpreting a da'wah reality. The research implies that besides providing academic contributions, it also obtains data which is the basis for controversy, giving birth to an understanding that is mutual respect, not suspicion. This paper has limitations regarding methodology, the number of informants and approaches. For this reason, this study suggests the need for segment expansion and a more varied approach to show a more comprehensive understanding in subsequent research.


Keywords


da'wah policy; da'i qualifications; standardization; certification.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abaza, M. (2004). Markets of faith: Jakartan Da’wa and islamic gentrification, Archipel, 67(1), 173–202. DOI:10.3406/ARCH.2004.3813.

Abdillah, M. (2013). Hubungan Agama dan Negara dalam Konteks Modernisasi Politik di Era Reformasi, AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 13(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v13i2.937

Akmaliah, W. (2020). The demise of moderate Islam: new media, contestation, and reclaiming religious authorities, Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.18326/ijims.v10.

Al-Bantany, N. (1994). Tafsir Munir, Marah Labid Likasyfi Ma’na Qur’anim Majid. Beirut: Dar el Fikr.

Al-Qurthubi, I. (2007). Tafsir Al-Qurtubi In edisi Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.

Andika, M. (2017) Ulama Madura Tolak Rencana Program Sertifikasi Dai Khotib Oleh Kemenag RI, https://mediaharapan.com/ulama-madura-tolak-rencana-program-sertifikasi-dai-khotib-oleh-kemenag-ri/, diakses pada 20 Juni 2022.

Arsam, A. (2017). Persepsi Para Mubaligh Terhadap Wacana Kontroversi Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh, Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 235–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1367.

Aziz, M. A. (2018). Sikap Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Islam Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Dan Perpu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 (Perspektif Studi Kebijakan Dakwah), Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 37(1), 108–133. DOI: 10.21580/jid.v37.1.2621.

Bona, M. F. (2021) Wamenag: Sertifikasi Penceramah Batal Jadi Program Kemag, https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/755053/wamenag-sertifikasi-penceramah-batal-jadi-program-kemag, diakses pada 25 Juni 2021.

Doni, B. A. (2017) Kemenag akan sertifikasi para penceramah agama di akses 20 Juni 2021, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3406111/kemenag-akan-sertifikasi-para-penceramah-agama diakses pada April 2022.

Fahrurrozi, F. (2018). Sertifikasi atau Standarisasi Khatib? Respons Para Da’i di Kota Mataram, Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 8(1), 155–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2018.8.1.155-178.

Friana, H. (2018) Potensi Masalah dari Rekomendasi 200 Nama Mubalig oleh Kemenag, https://tirto.id/potensi-masalah-dari-rekomendasi-200-nama-mubalig-oleh-kemenag-cKM4, diakses pada 20 Juli 2021

Hamka. (2018). Prinsip dan Kebijaksanaan Dakwah. Depok: Gema Insani Press.

Hartono, T., Rosidi, I., & Romadi, P. (2020). The Da’i (Muslim Preachers) And Social Change Challenges: A Study Of Da’i Professionalism In Dumai, Riau, Afkaruna, 16(1), 58–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2020.0113.58-81.

Hasanah, U. (2020). Kualifikasi Da’i: Komparasi Konseptual Retorika Dakwah dan Retorika Aristoteles, Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 10(2), 256–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2020.10.2.256-275.

Hasanah, U. (2021). Rhetoric in Islamic Tradition: Paradigm and Its Development, Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 15(2), 241–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v15i2.4570.

Hasyim, S. (2013). State and religion: Considering Indonesian Islam as model of democratisation for the muslim world, Occasional Paper 112, 1-36. Berlin: Liberales Institute.

Jati, W. R. (2015). Sufisme Urban di Perkotaan: Konstruksi Keimanan Baru Kelas Menengah Muslim, Inteleksia: Jurnal Kajian Dan Pengembangan Manajemen Dakwah, 5(2).

Kemenag. (2018). Kemenag Rilis Daftar 200 Nama Muballigh, https://kemenag.go.id/read/kemenag-rilis-daftar-200-nama-muballigh-empyp diakses pada 20 Juni 2021.

Kemenag, (2020). Kemenag: Penceramah Bersertifikat Bukan Sertifikasi Profesi, https://kemenag.go.id/berita/read/514033/kemenag--penceramah-bersertifikat-bukan-sertifikasi-profesi Diakses pada 15 Juni 2021.

Kloos, D., & Künkler, M. (2016). Studying Female Islamic Authority: From Top-Down to Bottom-Up Modes of Certification, Asian Studies Review, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1227300

Lensa Demokrasi (2020) Perlu Kerjasama dengan Stakeholder Untuk Jalankan Program Deradikalisasi di dalam Lapas, https://www.lensaindonesia.com/2020/08/07/perlu-kerjasama-dengan-stakeholder-untuk-jalankan-program-deradikalisasi-di-dalam-lapas.html diakses pada 20 Juli 2021.

Makin, A. (2018). ‘Not a Religious State’ A study of three Indonesian religious leaders on the relation of state and religion, Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(135), 95–116. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1380279.

Meuleman, J. (2011). Dakwah, competition for authority, and development, Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land-En Volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 167(2–3), 236–269. DOI: 10.2307/41288763.

Millie, J., Syarif, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2019). Islamic preaching and state regulation in Indonesia, Policy Paper, Centre for Indonesian Law, Islam and Society, Melbourne Law School.

Mufid, A. S. (2013). Paham Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jama’ah dan Tantangan Kontemporer dalam Pemikiran dan Gerakan Islam di Indonesia, Harmoni, 12(3), 8–18. DOI: https://jurnalharmoni.kemenag.go.id/index.php/harmoni/article/download/149/132.

MUI Digital. (2019). Hadiri Rakornas Komisi Pengkajian dan Penelitian MUI, Menag Imbau Aliran Keagamaan Kedepankan Toleransi, https://mui.or.id/berita/27391/hadiri-rakornas-komisi-pengkajian-dan-penelitian-mui-menag-imbau-aliran-keagamaan-kedepankan-toleransi/ diakses pada 20 Juni 2021.

Mulyanto, M. (2021). Peran Pakubuwono X dalam Pegembangan Dakwah Islam di Surakarta 1893-1939, Mamba’ul’Ulum, 17(1), 24–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54090/mu.10.

Munib, A. (2020). Framing Media Atas Pemberitaan Sertifikasi Dai, Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam, 3(2), 27–45.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jp.v3i2.6905.

Munib, A. (2021). Membongkar Wacana Sertifikasi Dai Menangkal Radikalisme dalam Program Televisi, Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 6(1), 53–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/jdk.v6i1.2957.

Natsir, M. (1996). Fiqhud Da’wah (ke-10). Jakarta: Yayasan Capita Selecta.

Permana, F. E. (2019). 3 Aspek Standardisasi Dai MUI dan

Rasionalisasinya, https://www.republika.co.id/berita/q1isxv320/3-aspek-standardisasi-dai-mui-dan-rasionalisasinya diakses ada 15 Juni 2021.

Rini, R. A. P. (2020). Alasan Muahmmadiyyah Tolak bergabung dengan Program Penceramah bersertifikat, https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2020/09/19/alasan-muhammadiyah-tolak-bergabung-dengan-program-penceramah-bersertifikat diakses pada 25 Juni 2021.

Ropi, I. (2017). Suharto New Order’s Regime, Development Programme and Religion, In Religion and Regulation in Indonesia, (pp. 127–137). Springer. DOI: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-2827-4.

Salam, M. I. H. A. (2016). Al-Dawlah wa al-Da ‘wah al-Islāmīyah fī ‘Ahd al-Niẓām al-Jadīd: Dirāsah fī Fikr Soeharto min Khilāl al-Khiṭābāt al-Ri’āsīyah fī al-Munāsabāt al-Islāmīyah bi Indonesia, Studia Islamika, 23(1), 143–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v23i1.3168 .

Seo, M. (2012). Defining ‘religious’ in Indonesia: toward neither an Islamic nor a secular state, Citizenship Studies, 16(8), 1045–1058.

Shihab, M. Q. (2011). Tafsir al-Misbah (cet. ke-IV). Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Syafruddin, D., Ropi, I., Nisa, Y. F., Hendarmin, L. A., Lubis, D. A., Mubarok, M. Z., Agung, S., Narhetali, E., & Rohayati, T. (n.d.). Gen Z : Kegalauan Identitas Keagamaan. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Wafiyah, W. (2017). Prioritas Berdakwah Pada Masa Penjajahan Belanda Di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 35(2), 269–285. DOI: 10.21580/jid.v35.2.1610.

Wahid, D. (2012). Challenging religious authority: The emergence of Salafi Ustadhs in Indonesia, Journal of Indonesian Islam, 6(2), 245–264. DOI: 10.15642/JIIS.2012.6.2.245-264.

Wibisono, G. (2018). Membendung Paham Radikalisme Agama Dan Ekstrim Kiri Dalam Mempertahankan Eksistensi Pancasila, Communitarian, 1(1). DOI: https://www.ejurnal.ubk.ac.id/index.php/communitarian/article/view/77.

Zaidan, A. K. (1985). Ushulu al-Da’wah. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v16i1.16531

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Editorial Office:

4th Floor, Building of Da'wah and Communication Faculty, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung Jl. AH. Nasution No. 105 Cipadung Cibiru Bandung 40614

Telp. (022) 7810788 Fax. (022) 7810788

E-mail: jurnal.ilmudakwah@uinsgd.ac.id

View My Stats