Kinesthetic Intelligence Based Learning to Improve the Students Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Managing Corpses Based on the Islamic Law


Ahmad syaeful Rahman(1*), Mohamad Athoillah(2)

(1) STIS As-Saadah Sukasari Sumedang, Indonesia
(2) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The low motivation of students can be caused by the monotony of learning activities. Besides that, teachers are less varied in delivering material because they always use conventional methods, so that students play a less active role in learning. The involvement of students in learning will create a good impression and, of course, can make learning more meaningful, especially if students are directly involved in observations and practical activities. One of the learning strategies that can be used to attract students' attention is multi- intelligence-based learning. Learning activities based on multiple intelligences that are appropriate to the characteristics of the Fiqih material regarding the management of corpses are kinesthetic intelligence. The subjects in this study involved students in grades IX B and IX C MTs. As-Sa'adah Sukasari totaled 36 and 37 students, respectively. The instruments used in this study include observation sheets, motivation and multiple intelligence questionnaires, and learning outcomes tests. The results showed that students' motivation and learning outcomes increased after learning based on multiple intelligences. This can be seen from the average category of multiple intelligence questionnaire results on kinesthetic intelligence indicators of 80.77 with very good criteria. The results of the motivation questionnaire in the experimental class after learning multiple intelligences in the experimental class have a very high category (84.57), while in the control class it has a medium category (55.57). Student learning outcomes in the experimental class increased in the medium category (N-Gain 0.53) while the learning outcomes in the control class were in the low category (N-Gain 0.12).


Keywords


Kinesthetic Intelligences, Motivation, Learning Outcomes, Managing Corpses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 300(300), 0.

Ay, K. M., Mansi, K. M., Al-Taieb, M. H. A., Ermeley, Z. M., Bayyat, M. M., & Aburjai, T. (2018). Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence in relation to swimming performance skills according to gender and swimming course level among physical education students. Sports Medicine Journal/Medicina Sportivâ, 14(2).

Chatib, M. (2012). Sekolah anak-anak juara: berbasis kecerdasan jamak dan pendidikan berkeadilan. Kaifa.

Fadhli, M., & Utami, P. S. (2018). The Correlation Between Watching Television and Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence of 6 Years Old Children. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 7(2), 106–110.

Gardner, H. E. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Hachette Uk.

Koçak, Ç. V. (2019). The relationship between attitude towards sports and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence in university students of sport science. Physical Education of Students, 23(3), 147–154.

Kristanto, P. (2009). Cara Jitu bikin Seru di Sekolah Minggu. Jakarta: Gloria Grafa.

Laely, K., & Yudi, D. (2018). The Impact of Hopscotch Game towards the Growth of Kinesthetic Intelligence on 3-4 Year Old Children. Early Childhood Research Journal (ECRJ), 1(1), 21–28.

Muhammad, A. (2013). Bimbingan Orang Sakit dan Pengurusan Jenazah. Alqaprin Jatinangor.

Omar, H. (2011). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Bumi Aksara.

Pebruanti, L., & Munadi, S. (2015). Peningkatan motivasi dan hasil belajar pada mata pelajaran pemograman dasar menggunakan modul di SMKN 2 Sumbawa. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 365–376.

Raja, F. U. (2018). Comparing Traditional Teaching Method and Experiential Teaching Method Using Experimental Research. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 276–288.

Reid, G. (2009). Memotivasi siswa di kelas: Gagasan dan strategi. Jakarta: Indeks.

Suddjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil proses Belajar mengajar Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (Sutopo (ed.)). Alfabeta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v12i1.15518

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad syaeful Rahman and Mohamad Athoillah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


IJIK: International Journal of Islamic Khazanah has been indexed on:

Google ScholarDOAJ

 

 UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Abdul Haris Nasution Street No.105, Cibiru,  Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

E-mail: IJIK@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

IJIK are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

 
Flag Counter
View my Stats ( Click )