Kinesthetic Intelligence Based Learning to Improve the Students Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Managing Corpses Based on the Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/ijik.v12i1.15518Keywords:
Kinesthetic Intelligences, Motivation, Learning Outcomes, Managing CorpsesAbstract
The low motivation of students can be caused by the monotony of learning activities. Besides that, teachers are less varied in delivering material because they always use conventional methods, so that students play a less active role in learning. The involvement of students in learning will create a good impression and, of course, can make learning more meaningful, especially if students are directly involved in observations and practical activities. One of the learning strategies that can be used to attract students' attention is multi- intelligence-based learning. Learning activities based on multiple intelligences that are appropriate to the characteristics of the Fiqih material regarding the management of corpses are kinesthetic intelligence. The subjects in this study involved students in grades IX B and IX C MTs. As-Sa'adah Sukasari totaled 36 and 37 students, respectively. The instruments used in this study include observation sheets, motivation and multiple intelligence questionnaires, and learning outcomes tests. The results showed that students' motivation and learning outcomes increased after learning based on multiple intelligences. This can be seen from the average category of multiple intelligence questionnaire results on kinesthetic intelligence indicators of 80.77 with very good criteria. The results of the motivation questionnaire in the experimental class after learning multiple intelligences in the experimental class have a very high category (84.57), while in the control class it has a medium category (55.57). Student learning outcomes in the experimental class increased in the medium category (N-Gain 0.53) while the learning outcomes in the control class were in the low category (N-Gain 0.12).
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 300(300), 0.
Ay, K. M., Mansi, K. M., Al-Taieb, M. H. A., Ermeley, Z. M., Bayyat, M. M., & Aburjai, T. (2018). Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence in relation to swimming performance skills according to gender and swimming course level among physical education students. Sports Medicine Journal/Medicina Sportivâ, 14(2).
Chatib, M. (2012). Sekolah anak-anak juara: berbasis kecerdasan jamak dan pendidikan berkeadilan. Kaifa.
Fadhli, M., & Utami, P. S. (2018). The Correlation Between Watching Television and Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence of 6 Years Old Children. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 7(2), 106–110.
Gardner, H. E. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Hachette Uk.
Koçak, Ç. V. (2019). The relationship between attitude towards sports and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence in university students of sport science. Physical Education of Students, 23(3), 147–154.
Kristanto, P. (2009). Cara Jitu bikin Seru di Sekolah Minggu. Jakarta: Gloria Grafa.
Laely, K., & Yudi, D. (2018). The Impact of Hopscotch Game towards the Growth of Kinesthetic Intelligence on 3-4 Year Old Children. Early Childhood Research Journal (ECRJ), 1(1), 21–28.
Muhammad, A. (2013). Bimbingan Orang Sakit dan Pengurusan Jenazah. Alqaprin Jatinangor.
Omar, H. (2011). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Bumi Aksara.
Pebruanti, L., & Munadi, S. (2015). Peningkatan motivasi dan hasil belajar pada mata pelajaran pemograman dasar menggunakan modul di SMKN 2 Sumbawa. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 365–376.
Raja, F. U. (2018). Comparing Traditional Teaching Method and Experiential Teaching Method Using Experimental Research. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 276–288.
Reid, G. (2009). Memotivasi siswa di kelas: Gagasan dan strategi. Jakarta: Indeks.
Suddjana, N. (2005). Penilaian Hasil proses Belajar mengajar Bandung Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (Sutopo (ed.)). Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Â