Wittgenstein's Challenge: The Impossibility of a Private Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v8i2.17417Keywords:
External worl, Private language argument, Philosophy of language, WittgeinsteinAbstract
The feasibility of a private language, a concept previously entertained by philosophers like Locke and Russell, is rigorously disputed by Wittgenstein in his later works. This article critically examines Wittgenstein’s standpoint on the notion of a private language, with a specific focus on its plausibility. It meticulously investigates the five arguments proffered by Wittgenstein against the concept of a private language and evaluates the counterarguments presented by his critics. These arguments encompass the future use argument, the interpretation argument, the stage-setting argument, the use argument, and the practice argument. Through a comprehensive analysis of these arguments, Wittgenstein substantiates the intrinsic unattainability of a private language. A privately defined word lacks the fundamental attributes of language, notably an established meaning, usability, prospective applicability, practical implications, interpretability, and a coherent framework governing the roles of its constituent elements. Ultimately, it is asserted that a private language cannot exist autonomously, separate from a public language.
References
Baker, Gordon. “The Private Language Argument.†Language & Communication 18, no. 4 (Oktober 1998): 325–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00010-X.
Beaney, Michael, ed. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Canfield, J.V. “Private Language: The Diary Case.†Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79, no. 3 (September 2001): 377–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659266.
Carney, James D. “The Private Language Argument.†The Southern Journal of Philosophy 9, no. 4 (Desember 1971): 353–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1971.tb02148.x.
Dawson, Hannah. “Locke on Private Language.†British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11, no. 4 (November 2003): 609–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960878032000160253.
Derrida, Jacques. Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Glock, Hans-Johann. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. The Blackwell philosopher dictionaries. Oxford, OX, UK ; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference, 1996.
Hacker, Peter Michael Stephan. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Rev. ed. Oxford [Oxfordshire] : New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press, 1986.
———. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Repr. of the rev. and corr. 1989 ed. Wittgenstein Studies. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1997.
Hacker, Peter Michael Stephan, dan Gordon P. Baker, ed. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind ; Part Ii: Exegesis $ 243 - 427. Reprinted. An Analytical Commentary on the “Philosophical Investigations,†Vol. 3,2. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.
Hintikka, Jaakko. “Wittgenstein on Private Language: Some Sources of Misunderstanding.†Mind 78, no. 311 (1969): 423–25.
Hodges, Michael. “Nominalism and the Private Language Argument.†The Southern Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 3 (September 1976): 283–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1976.tb01286.x.
Kimball, Robert H. “Private Criteria and the Private Language Argument.†The Southern Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 4 (Desember 1980): 411–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1980.tb01395.x.
Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Law, Stephen. “Five Private Language Arguments.†International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12, no. 2 (Juni 2004): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550410001679837.
Lawn, Chris. Wittgenstein and Gadamer: Towards a Post-Analytic Philosophy of Language. Continuum studies in German philosophy. London ; New York: Continuum, 2004.
Lin, Francis Y. “Wittgenstein’s Private Language Investigation.†Philosophical Investigations 40, no. 3 (Juli 2017): 257–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12148.
Malcolm, Norman. Knowledge and Certainty: Essays and Lectures. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
———. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.†The Philosophical Review 63, no. 4 (Oktober 1954): 530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182289.
Marks, Charles E. “Verificationism, Scepticism, and the Private Language Argument.†Philosophical Studies 28, no. 3 (1 September 1975): 151–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375985.
McGinn, Colin. Wittgenstein on Meaning: An Interpretation and Evaluation. Aristotelian Society series, v. 1. Oxford, England ; Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell, 1984.
McGinn, Marie. The Routledge Guidebook to Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. The Routledge guides to the great books. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2013.
Meyers, C. D., dan Sara Waller. “Psychological Investigations: The Private Language Argument and Inferences in Contemporary Cognitive Science.†Synthese 171, no. 1 (November 2009): 135–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9382-y.
Sorell, Tom, dan G. A. J. Rogers, ed. Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Mind Association occasional series. Oxford : New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press, 2005.
Stern, David G. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge introductions to key philosophical texts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Stocker, Barry. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2006.
Strawson, P. F. “Critical Notice of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.†Mind LXIII, no. 249 (1 Januari 1954): 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXIII.249.70.
Stroud, Barry. Meaning, Understanding, and Practice: Philosophical Essays. 1. publ. in paperback. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.
Wilson, Brendan. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, dan G. E. M. Anscombe. Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with a Revised English Translation. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2001.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, dan Anthony Kenny. The Wittgenstein Reader. Blackwell readers. Oxford, UK ; Cambridge, Mass., USA: B. Blackwell, 1994.
Wrisley, George. “Wherefore the Failure of Private Ostension?†Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89, no. 3 (September 2011): 483–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2010.495131.
