HEGEMONY BY ANTONIO GRAMSCI IN THE LION KING FILM

Authors

  • Jelita Dewanty Hendarsyah Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung, Indonesia
  • Abd. Hannan EF Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung, Indonesia
  • Lili Awaludin Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v3i2.14507

Abstract

In this thesis, the researcher focuses on discussing the coup in The Lion King film directed by John Favreau in 2019. This research is based on the model proposed by Antonio Gramsci's hegemony of power, this theory covers the causes of the normal practice of overthrowing power and the relationship of consent using the power structure. The purpose of this research is to find out and understand the relationship between the conflict between the main characters causing the coup d'etat represented in film literature; especially in examining the similarities in the causes of the coup d'etat from the perspective of the Hegemony of Power, the three aspects that caused the coup d'etat; Obsession, Discrimination, and Betrayal. To find out the truth, the researcher focuses on examining the hegemony of power that is applied in The Lion King Film. Hegemony is applied in the form of driving bad opinions to achieve the desired result, namely becoming a king. The results of this study indicate that there are 3 reasons for the application of the hegemony of power contained in The Lion King Film, obsession, driving bad opinion, cunning.

Keywords : Coup, research, The Lion King film, overthrowing of power, government.

References

Abraham, M. H. (1999). A Glosary of Literary Terms. Heinle & Heinle.

Barnet, S., Burto, W., & Cain, W. (2008). An Introduction to Literature (Fiction, Poetry, and Drama). Pearson Longman.

Bassnett, S. (1993). Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell.

Blackwell, W. (2011). A Companion to Comparative Literature. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Brian, T. (2016). The Lion King. Walt Disney Pictures. Burbank.

Budiman, M. (2005). Tentang Sastra Bandingan. Kalam Jurnal Kebudayaan. Kebudayaan

Kalam.

Clements, R. J. (1978). Comparative Literature As Academic Discipline. The Modern Language

Association of America.

Corrigan, T., & White, P. (2004). The film experience: An introduction. Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Damono, S. D. (2005). Pegangan Penelitian Sastra Bandingan. Pusat Bahasa Departemen

Pendidikan Nasional.

Endaswara, S. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. CAPS.

Fic, V. M. (2005). Kudeta 1 Oktober 1965 Sebuah Studi Tentang Konspirasi. Yayasan Obor

Indonesia.

Garneisa, I. (2019). Lion King: Nostalgis Coup D’etat, Gambar Brilian, tapi Karakter Terasa

Hambar. tirto.id-Film.

Gramsci, A., & H, Q. (1978). Selections from Political Writings (1921-1926). London WC1.

Harjito. (2014). Hegemoni Gramsci dalam Sastra Indonesia: Student Hijo, Nasionalisme, dan

Wacana Kolonial. UPGRIS Press.

Haryanto. (2017). Elit, Massa, dan Kekuasaan : Suatu Bahasan Pengantar. Penerbit PolGov.

Herman, V. (1995). Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. Routledge.

Hikmat, M. M. (2011). Metode Penelitian: Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sastra.

Graha Ilmu.

Irwan, H. (2018). Hegemoni Kelas Berkuasa Terhadap Kelas Subordinat Dalam Novel Kubah Karya Ahmad Tohari (Tinjauan Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci). Universitas Negeri Makasar.

Nurrachman, D. (2017). Literary Decorum and the Function of Literature to Teach and to

Delight. In D. Nurrachman, Intrduction to Criticism. Pustaka Aura Semesta.

Nurrachman, D. (2019). Critical Theory: The Contemporary Theory On Culture, Art, Language,

and Literature. Pustaka Aura Semesta.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): CALL

Section

Vol. 3, No. 1 (2021): CALL

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish in CALL agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under  Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).