SIGNS IN DAUD KIM'S STATEMENTS ON HIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL: THE CORRECTIONS OF MISTAKEN ISLAMIC UNDERSTANDING


Mia Ananda Derasta(1*), Yuyun Nurulaen(2), Dian Nurrachman(3)

(1) English Literature, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(2) English Literature, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(3) English Literature, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The study aimed to examine icons, indices, and symbols in Daud's speech connected to misconceptions about Islam through the semiosis method. Semiotics can be used in a variety of contexts. therefore, it is crucial to conduct study in this area to prevent misconceptions about Islam. The study has two issues: (1) the semiotic indicators in Daud Kim's vlog that are connected to misinterpretations of Islamophobic messaging (2) Daud Kim's vlog discusses misinterpreting messages about Islam's semiosis process. In order to reply to and examine the problems, Peirce's theory of triadic relation was used which illustrates the relationship between the represent, object, and interpretation in semiotics. The description of the semiosis process and how it relates to how the indicators should be interpreted were made evident in this study using the qualitative technique. The research's semiosis process: Every statement—verbal or nonverbal—began as a representamen, progressed to an object as the first point at that statement, and—from the relationship between representamen and object—became the interpretant in the end. As a consequence, the study discovered that Daud's statement can be strengthened by the semiosis process in order to avoid and clarify the mistaken message about Islam. It is possible to understand as far as feasible, the essence of the Islamic message through representation, object, and interpreter.

 Keywords: semiosis, Daud Kim, icon, index, and symbol


Full Text:

PDF (125–136)

References


(Republika), A. N. (2021). Sebut Murid Muslim Teroris, Guru di New Jersey Diskors. Discrimination. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r1onop366/sebut-murid-muslim-teroris-guru-di-new-jersey-diskors

Bradley, J., & Harvey, L. (2019). Creative inquiry in applied linguistics: Language, communication and the arts. Voices and Practices In, 91.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: the basics. Routledge.

CNN Indonesia. (2021). No Alasan Islam Kerap Diidentikkan dengan Teroris. Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20210503142305-284-637906/alasan-islam-kerap-diidentikkan-dengan-teroris

Rusmana, D. (2005). Tokoh dan Pemikiran Semiotik. Tazkiya Press.

Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press.

Kim, D. (2019). Are muslims terrorists? No! (p. 02:15). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_-jxxEUN7w

Pratiwi, M. (2018). Symbol As The Way To Deliver Message In Mother! Movie. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati.

Sobur, A. (2002). Bercengkerama dengan semiotika. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 3(1), 31– 50.

Tankovska, H. (2021). Global social networks ranked by number of users 2021.

Vardani, E. N. A. (2016). Pendekatan semiotik dalam alquran surat alqiyamah. Belajar Bahasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v4i2.15329

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

CALL is indexed by:

Moraref Dimensions Indexing One SearchWorld cat ROADCrossref  

 

 

 

 

Creative Commons License All Articles and Contents in CALL are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License

 

 

 


CALL, ISSN 2723-2417 (online)
English Literature, Faculty of Adab and Humanities, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

 

 

 

View My Stats