ECOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS LEADER’S SPEECH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v8i1.53674

Keywords:

: critical discourse analysis, ecolinguistics, environment, religious leader

Abstract

This study examines how environmental responsibility is discursively constructed in Alissa Qotrunnada Wahid’s speech by situating it within broader debates on religion, language, and the global climate crisis. The research aims to identify the ideological orientation of the speech and to evaluate its ecological implications through critical discourse analysis. Employing Fairclough’s (2003) three-dimensional model, textual analysis, discursive practice, and social practice, this study is complemented by Halliday’s transitivity system as well as the ecolinguistics and ecosophy framework developed by Stibbe (2021). The findings reveal that, at the textual level, the speech is dominated by material, relational, and mental processes, which collectively construct environmental protection as concrete, urgent, and morally grounded collective action rather than a purely abstract or normative appeal. The inclusive pronoun “we” positions religious institutions and communities as active agents of change, while relational processes establish environmental protection as an essential ethical and spiritual value. At the level of discursive practice, the speech is produced and legitimized through the symbolic authority of major religious organizations, particularly Nahdlatul Ulama and the GUSDURian Network, and disseminated through both formal education and grassroots community-based initiatives, including interfaith and family-centered programs. In the dimension of social practice, the discourse reflects and responds to Indonesia’s ecological challenges and advances religious ideology that frames nature as a moral trust integral to religious teachings. From an ecolinguistic perspective, the analysis concludes that the speech predominantly constitutes a beneficial discourse. It affirms values of sustainability, rejects exploitative representations of nature, and actively promotes the transformation of awareness and collective social practice toward ecological responsibility.

References

Ali, I., & Rahman, A. (2024). Environmental degradation: Causes, effects and solutions. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.20366

ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community. (2025). Changing disaster risk landscape due to climate change in ASEAN (Vol. 10, Issue 10).

Begum, A., Liu, J., Haider, M., Ajmal, M. M., Khan, S., & Han, H. (2021). Impact of environmental moral education on pro-environmental behaviour: Do psychological empowerment and Islamic religiosity matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041604

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. Continuum.

Jabeen, I. (2024). The portrayal of environmental concerns: An ecolinguistic analysis of media discourse. World Journal of English Language, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p13

Maha, R. F., Widayati, D., Dardanila, & Lubis, R. (2024). Realization of euphemism in discourse of environment about the movement of the state’s capital: Critical ecolinguistics. Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v7i2.2063

Muslim Council of Elders. (2023). Indonesia tuan rumah konferensi Majelis Hukama Muslimin tentang agama dan perubahan iklim tingkat Asia Tenggara. https://www.muslim-elders.or.id/news/r/indonesia-tuan-rumah-konferensi-majelis-hukama-muslimin-tentang-agama-dan-perubahan-iklim-tingkat-asia-tenggara

Pasaribu, D., Takwin, B., & Martens, P. (2022). The role of religious narratives and religious orientation towards concerns for the natural environment and animal welfare. PLOS ONE, 17, e0271515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271515.

Shihab, M. Q. (2023). Islam & Lingkungan: Perspektif Al-Quran Menyangkut Pemeliharaan Lingkungan. Lentera Hati

Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences, 41, 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853001753639251

Stibbe, A. (2021). Ekolinguistik: Bahasa, ekologi, dan cerita-cerita yang kita jalani. Pustaka Pelajar.

Widodo, D., Kristianto, S., Susilawaty, A., Armus, R., Sari, M., Chaerul, M., & Ahmad, S. N. (2021). Ekologi dan ilmu lingkungan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Yuliastutik, R., & Putikadyanto, A. P. A. (2024). Analisis ekolinguistik kritis dalam video Pandawara Group pembersih sampah: Perspektif Teun A. Van Dijk. Ghancaran: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (Special Edition: Lalonget V). https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.17206

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check