NAVIGATING AMBIGUITY: COGNITIVE SEMANTICS OF POLYSEMOUS TITLES IN BREAKING BAD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/call.v8i1.55148Keywords:
polysemy, content analysis, episode titles, Breaking Bad, ambiguityAbstract
This paper investigated how episode titles in Breaking Bad (2008–2013) carried multiple interconnected meanings that influenced narrative interpretation. By applying a cognitive semantics framework, it explored how polysemous titles activated semantic networks and invited dynamic reinterpretation as the story unfolded. Using qualitative content analysis, four episodes—Pilot (S1E1), Cancer Man (S1E4), Crazy Handful of Nothin’ (S1E6), and I See You (S3E8)—were examined for literal and metaphorical layers of meaning. Findings revealed that titles functioned simultaneously as direct references (e.g., medical diagnosis, poker bluff, hospital surveillance) and as metaphorical devices (e.g., Walt as “pilot” of his destiny, cancer as moral decay, bluff as illusion of power, surveillance as vulnerability). Cognitive semantics explained how audiences process these layered meanings: viewers initially interpreted titles literally, but as narrative contexts evolved, they re-accessed metaphorical dimensions through semantic network activation. These layered meanings enriched character arcs, foreshadowed conflicts, and amplified thematic resonance, particularly in the exploration of morality, identity, and consequence. By highlighting polysemy as both a linguistic and cognitive-semantic device, this research contributed to television studies and linguistic analysis, offering new insights into how ambiguity in language deepened storytelling and sustained audience engagement across disciplines.
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Content analysis. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An introduction. McGraw-Hill Education.
Brahim, A. (2021). Synecdoche in linguistic theory. Journal of Semantics, 38(2), 145– 162.
Fernando, J. (2017). The moral descent of Walter White: A philosophical reading of Breaking Bad. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(4), 210–225.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392.
Gilligan, V. (Creator). (2008–2013). Breaking Bad [Television series]. AMC. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Breaking-Bad
Johanson, L. (2007). Polysemy and homonymy in linguistic analysis. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), 467–489.
Kaplan, D., & Hudson, J. (2010). Polysemy and lexical ambiguity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(6), 821–847.
Kapnoula, E. C., & Samuel, A. G. (2019). Voices in the mental lexicon: Words carry indexical information that can affect access to their meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 111–127. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.05.001
Koch, G. (2017). Cinematic techniques in Breaking Bad: A visual analysis. Film Studies, 19(1), 45–60.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Littlemore, J., & T., J. (2016). Metonymy and its role in meaning-making. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(3), 321–339.
Logan, E. (2016). Visual storytelling in Breaking Bad. Journal of Visual Culture, 15(2), 178–195.
Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2019). The mental lexicon and word processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 499–525.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Preiser, R., Mancilla García, M., Hill, L., & Klein, L. (2021). Qualitative content analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods for Complexity Science (pp. 1–20). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Redden, S. (2017). Metaphor and meaning in linguistic communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 34–47.
Restivo, A. (2019). The cinematic language of Breaking Bad. Cinema Journal, 58(3), 89–104.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Sharett, C. (2021). Pride and downfall in Breaking Bad. Philosophy and Literature, 45(1), 123–139.
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Routledge.
Vicente, A., & Falkum, I. L. (2017). Polysemy and the mental lexicon. Language Sciences, 64, 1–13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 kurnia idawati, Soepriyatna; Ariza Purnawati, Juliansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in CALL agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
