Due to Legal Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court that Exceed the Time Limitation of 50 Working Days Since the First Session
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i1.17348Keywords:
decision, industrial relations court, time limitAbstract
This study examines the legal consequences of industrial relations court decisions that exceed the time limit of 50 working days from the first trial. This research is normative legal research, which is conducting research by examining various laws and regulations and legal principles related to the settlement of industrial relations disputes. The study results indicate that the industrial relations court's decision is still legally valid even though the decision has passed the time limit of 50 working days from the first trial as regulated in Article 103 of the PPHI Law. This is because the procedural law adheres to lex stricta, which must be interpreted strictly, including the prohibition on the interpretation of analogies. Apart from the principle of lex stricta, the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, and the null and void nature of the law, it also confirms that the IRC's decision remains valid even though it violates the provisions of Article 103 of the PPHI Law. Based on the research results, it can be suggested that the Supreme Court immediately issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) regarding the imposition of administrative sanctions on the industrial relations court judges who violate the provisions of Article 103 of the PPHI Law.
References
Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2019). Sengketa Pilpres, Keterangan Ahli, Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Hairi, P. J. (2016). Kontradiksi Pengaturan “Hukum Yang Hidup Di Masyarakat†Sebagai Bagian Dari Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 7, 102.
Hakim, M. A. (2016). Peran Pemerintah Dalam Mengawasi Mekanisme Pasar Dalam Perspektif Islam. Iqtishadia, 8(1).
Hasanah, S. (2018). Arti Putusan Pengadilan “Batal Demi Hukum.â€
Iskandar, A. P., & Nugroho, A. (2018). Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Menyelesaikan Perkara Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Waktu Paling Lama 50 Hari (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Surabaya). Jurnal Novum, 05(01), 1–10.
Jayadi, A. (2018). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Asas Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5397
Juniarti, D. B. (2021). Fulfillment of Defendant's Rights in PERMA Number 4 of 2020 reviewed from the Principle of Due Process of Law. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50385
Lawrence, M. F. (2017). Sistem hukum : perspektif ilmu sosial (M. Khozim & N. Mangunsong (eds.); Cetakan 7). Nusa Media.
Maryanto, M., & Safitri, W. (2018). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Pada Pengadilan Negeri Klas Ia Samarinda. Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 10(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i1.267
Mawar, S. (2016). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Interpretasi dan Konstruksi) Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Hukum. Jurnal Justisia, 1(1), ثقثقثقثق. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v1i1.2558
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Mengenal Hukum. Liberty Yogyakarta.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan hukum : sebuah pengantar (Edisi 2, C). Liberty.
Monteiro, J. M. (2018). Teori Penemuan Hukum Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum Prioris.
Prasetyo, N., Fadli, M., SN, T., & Safaat, M. (2021). The Politics of Indonesias Decentralization Law Based on Regional Competency. Brawijaya Law Journal, 8(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.02.01
Saleh, H. M., & Mulyadi, L. (2012). Seraut Wajah Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Indonesia (Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya). PT. Citra Aditya Abadi.
Santoso, B. (2011). Pengaturan Mogok Kerja dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 6.
Sarwono, S. W. (2019). Psikologi remaja. Rajawali Pers.
Sarwono, T. (2018). Hukum acara perdata : teori dan praktik (Edisi 1, C). Sinar Grafika.
Sitinjak, B., & Ediwarman. (2014). Penerapan Hukum Acara Khusus Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Jurnal Mercatoria, 7(1).
Sophar Maru Hutagalung. (2019). Praktik peradilan perdata dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Suadi, H. A. (2019). Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Kencana.
Wajdi, F. (2017). Makna Transendensi Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.
Yahya Harapan, M. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata : Tentang: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi 2, C). Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).