Due to Legal Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court that Exceed the Time Limitation of 50 Working Days Since the First Session


I Made Adiwidya Yowana(1*)

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial Politik (STISPOL) Wira Bhakti Denpasar, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examines the legal consequences of industrial relations court decisions that exceed the time limit of 50 working days from the first trial. This research is normative legal research, which is conducting research by examining various laws and regulations and legal principles related to the settlement of industrial relations disputes. The study results indicate that the industrial relations court's decision is still legally valid even though the decision has passed the time limit of 50 working days from the first trial as regulated in Article 103 of the PPHI Law. This is because the procedural law adheres to lex stricta, which must be interpreted strictly, including the prohibition on the interpretation of analogies. Apart from the principle of lex stricta, the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, and the null and void nature of the law, it also confirms that the IRC's decision remains valid even though it violates the provisions of Article 103 of the PPHI Law. Based on the research results, it can be suggested that the Supreme Court immediately issued a Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) regarding the imposition of administrative sanctions on the industrial relations court judges who violate the provisions of Article 103 of the PPHI Law.


Keywords


decision, industrial relations court, time limit

Full Text:

PDF

References


Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2019). Sengketa Pilpres, Keterangan Ahli, Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Hairi, P. J. (2016). Kontradiksi Pengaturan “Hukum Yang Hidup Di Masyarakat” Sebagai Bagian Dari Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 7, 102.

Hakim, M. A. (2016). Peran Pemerintah Dalam Mengawasi Mekanisme Pasar Dalam Perspektif Islam. Iqtishadia, 8(1).

Hasanah, S. (2018). Arti Putusan Pengadilan “Batal Demi Hukum.”

Iskandar, A. P., & Nugroho, A. (2018). Pelaksanaan Kewajiban Menyelesaikan Perkara Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Waktu Paling Lama 50 Hari (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Surabaya). Jurnal Novum, 05(01), 1–10.

Jayadi, A. (2018). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Asas Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5397

Juniarti, D. B. (2021). Fulfillment of Defendant's Rights in PERMA Number 4 of 2020 reviewed from the Principle of Due Process of Law. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50385

Lawrence, M. F. (2017). Sistem hukum : perspektif ilmu sosial (M. Khozim & N. Mangunsong (eds.); Cetakan 7). Nusa Media.

Maryanto, M., & Safitri, W. (2018). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Pada Pengadilan Negeri Klas Ia Samarinda. Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 10(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v10i1.267

Mawar, S. (2016). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Interpretasi dan Konstruksi) Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Hukum. Jurnal Justisia, 1(1), ثقثقثقثق. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v1i1.2558

Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Mengenal Hukum. Liberty Yogyakarta.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan hukum : sebuah pengantar (Edisi 2, C). Liberty.

Monteiro, J. M. (2018). Teori Penemuan Hukum Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum Prioris.

Prasetyo, N., Fadli, M., SN, T., & Safaat, M. (2021). The Politics of Indonesias Decentralization Law Based on Regional Competency. Brawijaya Law Journal, 8(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.02.01

Saleh, H. M., & Mulyadi, L. (2012). Seraut Wajah Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Indonesia (Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya). PT. Citra Aditya Abadi.

Santoso, B. (2011). Pengaturan Mogok Kerja dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 6.

Sarwono, S. W. (2019). Psikologi remaja. Rajawali Pers.

Sarwono, T. (2018). Hukum acara perdata : teori dan praktik (Edisi 1, C). Sinar Grafika.

Sitinjak, B., & Ediwarman. (2014). Penerapan Hukum Acara Khusus Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Jurnal Mercatoria, 7(1).

Sophar Maru Hutagalung. (2019). Praktik peradilan perdata dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Suadi, H. A. (2019). Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Kencana.

Wajdi, F. (2017). Makna Transendensi Demi Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.

Yahya Harapan, M. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata : Tentang: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi 2, C). Sinar Grafika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i1.17348

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 I Made Adiwidya Yowana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614
Handphone: +6282176562270

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International