The Representation of Social Actors in Political Editorial Reports of an On-Line Indonesian National Newspapers


Barzan Faizin(1*)

(1) UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article is a critical discourse analysis of the representation of social actors in an on-line Indonesian National newspaper’s (Media Indonesia) editorial reports on the political issues on ‘intolerance’ recovery, the allocation of Regional Government Budget, and reclamation project post the Jakarta governor election 2017. In line with this historical event, this study attempts to examine how social actors—Anies, Ahok and society are  represented in the MI’s editorial reports. The main objectives of this research are: (1) to examine the exclusin and inclusion strategies in which the social actors are represented in the reports, and (2) to describe how the social actors are positioned (whether) in the positive self- and negative other presentation This study applied Van Leeuwen’s Social Actor Network and Wodak’s Discourse-Historical Approach. The study reveals that the present governor, Anies is mostly represented negatively in the political issues post the Jakarta governor election 2017. Conversely, the other social actor, Ahok is completely portrayed in a positive manner and society is depicted in a neutral mode. In the terms of power and ideology, it is obvious that Media Indonesia has a dominant power over its readers, and embraces secularism ideology in politics and capitalism ideology in economy.


Keywords


exclusion, inclusion, media Indonesia, representations, social actors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. R. (2020). Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), and Beyond. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49379-0_1

Dashti, L., & Mehrpour, S. (2017). Representation of social actors in J. Krishnamurti and Alan Watts’ philosophical speeches: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(4), 51–59.

Fairclough, N. (2020). Discourse in social change. In Language and Power (pp. 175–204). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250-13

Forchtner, B. (2011). Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.533564

Forchtner, B. (2021). Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093

Foucault, M. (2021). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (an excerpt). In Coronavirus, Psychoanalysis, and Philosophy: Conversations on Pandemics, Politics and Society (pp. 23–26). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003150497-3

Ghanizadeh, A., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2020). Critical discourse analysis. In Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 101–116). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56711-8_3

Hamad, I. (2004). KONSTRUKSI REALITAS POLITIK DALAM MEDIA MASSA (Studi Pesan Politik Dalam Media Cetak Pada Masa Pemilu 1999). Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v8i1.77

Hidalgo Tenorio, E. (2011). Critical discourse analysis, an overview. In NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 183–210). https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.247

Jabar, N. F. A., & Yunus, K. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as an approach to the analysis of language. In Man in India (Vol. 97, Issue 16, pp. 357–365).

Kabgani, S. (2013). The Representation of Muslim Women in Non-Islamic Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis Study on Guardian. International Journal of Women’s Research, 2(1), 57–78.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Lippmann, W. (2017). Public opinion. In Public Opinion. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127736

Mayr, A. (2015). Institutional Discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 753–774). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch35

Mills, S. (2014). Language, culture, and politeness. In The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 129–140). Routledge.

Rashidi, N., & Rasti, A. (2012). Doing (in) Justice to Iran’s Nuke Activities? A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports of Four Western Quality Newspapers. American Journal of Linguistics, 2012(1), 1–9. http://journal.sapub.org/linguistics

Reisigl, M. (2017). The discourse-historical approach. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 44–59). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342

Tarbet, D. W., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1978). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 11(4), 509. https://doi.org/10.2307/2737970

Ulinnuha, R., Udasmoro, W., & Wijaya, Y. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Theory and method in social and literary framework. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v2i2.170

Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, 43, 27–65.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. In Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001

Weissenrieder, M., & Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 428. https://doi.org/10.2307/329335

Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about a summary of its history, important concepts and development. Meyer, M.(ur.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks in New Delhi.

Wodak, R., & Kendall, G. (2007). What is critical discourse analysis? In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Vol. 8, Issue 2).

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2011). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i3.20813

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Barzan Faizin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614
Handphone: +6282176562270

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International