The Role and Impact of Forensic Investigations Unit in the Fight Against Fraud, Corruption, Irregularities, Financial Misconduct and Maladministration in the Public Sector of South Africa


Tumiso D. Mokhomole(1*)

(1) Forensic Investigations, Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, South Africa
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article examines the role and impact of the Forensic Investigations Unit in the fight against fraud, corruption, irregularities, financial misconduct and maladministration in the public sector of South Africa. Section 85(b) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1 of 1999 (PFMA) requires the Minister of Finance to craft regulations stipulating matters relating to the investigations of allegations of financial misconduct. The study adopted a qualitative research approach. Eight (8) participants from the Forensic Investigations Units of various state departments/ institutions were interviewed using open-ended questions. The study followed a purposive sampling guide as a participant were purposively selected. The study found that the role of the Forensic Investigations Unit in the public sector is to investigate the allegations of common law offences such as fraud, corruption, maladministration and financial irregularities. This Unit's impact is to reduce fraud and corruption incidents within the public sector and promote ethical public service through its recommendations. This study recommends amendments to the Public Service Act 1994 (PSA) and Part Three of the Public Service Regulations 2016 (PSR). The amendment is to fulfil the role of the Forensic Investigations Unit as part of a multi-anti-corruption agency in government departments/agencies. It is hoped to resolve reported allegations of fraud, corruption, irregularities and maladministration in the South African public sector quickly and effectively.

Keywords


Public sector, fraud, corruption, irregularities, financial misconduct, maladministration.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhabi, E. & Anozie, C.B. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in qualitative research. International Journal Education, 9(3): 1-12. [Online] Available from: https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v9i3.11483 [Accessed: 13/01/2022].

Affleck, W., Glass, K.C. & Macdonald, M.E. (2012). The Limitations of Language: Male Participants, Stoicism, and the Qualitative Research Interview. American Journal of Men's Health, 7(2): 155-162. DOI: 10.1177/1557988312464038.

Ames, H., Glenton, C. & Lewin, S. (2019). Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 1-9. [Online] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4 [Accessed: 03/03/2021].

Begg, A. (2022). Missing millions – Whistle-blower reveals how Department of Water and Sanitation covered up its own probe. Daily Maverick, 30 May. [Onilne] Available from: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-04-30-missing-millions-whistle-blower-reveals-how-department-of-water-and-sanitation-covered-up-its-own-probe/ [Accessed: 02/05/2022].

Chenail, R.J. (2011). Interviewing the Investigator: Strategies for Addressing Instrumenation and Researcher Bias Concerns in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), Jan.: 255-262. [Online] Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-1/interviewing.pdf [Accessed: 08/05/2022].

Cleary, M., Horsfall, J. & Hayter, M. (2014). Data collection and sampling in qualitative research: does size matter? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(3): 473-475. [Online] Available from: https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/jan.12163.

Coffelt, T.A. (2017). Confidentiality and anonymity of participants. Lowa State University Digital Repository, 227-230. In: Allen, M. (Ed), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Online] Available from: doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n86.

Dramat, A. (2014). Briefing by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI): Mandate and Activities. In: Beukman, F. (2014). Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI): Mandate and Activities. Parliamentary Monitoring Group, 17 September. [Online] Available from: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/17552/ [Accessed: 27/01/2022].

Fusch, P.I. & Ness, L.R. (2015). Are Were There Yet? Data Satuaration in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9): 1408-1416. [Online] Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf [Accessed: 08/05/2022].

Garcia, D. & Gluesing, J.C. (2013). Qualitative research method in international organisational change research. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 26(2): 423-444. [Online] Available from: DOI 10.1108/09534811311328416.

Hawkins, J.E. (2018). The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 23(2): 493-501.

Hlengwa, M. (2021). NPA & Hawks update on SIU-referred cases; with Deputy Minister. Parliamentary Monitoring Group, 06 July. [Online] Available from: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/33278/ [Accessed: 29/01/2022].

Hlengwa, M. (2019). SIU investigations into municipalities; NPA on SIU-referred cases. Parliamentary Monitoring Group, 16 October. [Online] Available from: https://pmg.org.za/committee-meeting/29081/ [Accessed: 27/01/2022].

Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), Sept-Nov.: 87-88. [Online] Available from: doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.141942 [Accessed: 08/05/2022].

Magubane, K. (2022). These government departments waste the most money – Auditor-General. Fin24, 26 August. [Online] Available from: https://www.news24.com/fin24/economy/these-government-departments-waste-the-most-money-auditor-general-20220826 [Accessed: 26/08/2022].

Middleton, F. (2019). Reliability vs Validity in Research. Scribbr, 21 July. [Online] Available from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/reliability-vs-validity/ [Accessed: 28/07/2022].

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research Methods for Business Students. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

South African Government News Agency. (2022). SIU to investigate alleged Telkom corruption. SAnews.gov.za, 26 January. [Online] Available from: https://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/siu-investigate-alleged-telkom-corruption [Accessed: 28/01/2022].

South Africa. (2001). The Treasury Regulations. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Spielman, S.E. (2014). Spatial collective intelligence? Credibility, accuracy, and volunteered geographic information. Cartography and Geographic information Science, 41(2): 115-124. [Online] Available from: DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2013.874200 [Accessed: 08/05/2022].

Surmiak, A. (2018). Confidentiality in Qualitative Research Involving Vulnerable Participants: Researchers' Perspectives [55 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), Art. 12. [Online] Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099 [Accessed: 09/05/2022].

Swift, J.A. & Tischler, V. (2010). Qualitative research in nutrition and dietetics: getting started. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 23, 559-566.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2): 311-325.

Wolf, R. (2021). Advantages of Open-Ended Questions. MoneyLearn, 25 January. [Online] Available from: https://monkeylearn.com/blog/advantages-of-open-ended-questions/ [Accessed: 12/01/2022].

Government Regulations

South Africa. The Department of Public Service and Administration. (S.a). Anti-Corruption Capacity Requirements: Guidelines for implementing Minimum Anti-Corruption Capacity Requirements in Departments and organisational Components in the Public Service. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. National Anti-Corruption Strategy. (2020-2030). National Development Plan Version for 2030. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act, No. 108 0f 1996 as adopted by the Constitutional Assembly on 08 May 1996. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (1998). The Correctional Service Act, No. 111 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (1998). The National Prosecuting Authority Act, No. 32 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (2004). The Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, No. 12 of 2004. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (2014). The Public Administration Management Act, No. 11 of 2014. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1992). The Reporting by Public Entities Act, 93 of 1992. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1999). The Public Finance Management Act, No. 1 of 1999. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1994). The Public Protector Act, No. 23 of 1994. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (2016). The Public Service Act of 1994. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1997). The Public Service Commission Act, No. 46 of 1997. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (2016). The Public Service Regulations. Pretoria: Government Printers.

South Africa. (1996). The Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, No. 74 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa. (2008). The South African Police Service Amendment Act, No. 57 of 2008. Pretoria: Government Printer.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i1.22605

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tumiso D. Mokhomole

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614
Handphone: +6282176562270

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International