Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i3.35508Keywords:
defamation of character, public interest, social media, video reviewAbstract
Consumers who post negative reviews of products on social media often face defamation claims by business entities. Such lawsuits have had a chilling effect on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by law. In adjudicating consumer cases, judges have generally failed to apply the concept of common interest as a consideration, despite the potential benefits and awareness such reviews provide to prospective consumers. The common interest concept, as stipulated in defamation laws, can serve as a form of legal protection for consumers who post reviews on social media, provided the reviews are truthful, reflect actual conditions, and are made in good faith. By implementing the common interest concept and conducting its proper assessment, legal protection can be ensured for both consumers and businesses. Consumers would be shielded from unwarranted defamation claims, while businesses would be protected from malicious reviews by bad-faith consumers that result in financial or reputational harm. This study aims to dissect the legal safeguard afforded to consumers through the prism of common interest when confronting social media-based complaints or reviews ensnared in defamation litigations instigated by corporate entities. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research amalgamates legislative analysis with conceptual frameworks. The research findings accentuate the significance of invoking the public interest doctrine in consumer-related litigation, thereby fortifying legal defenses against defamation allegations.References
Agustalita, D. H., & Yuherawan, D. S. B. (2023). Makna Kepentingan Umum Pada Kewenangan Deponering Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 160–189. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p160-189
Anand, G., Yudhantaka, L., & Lingkar Katulistiwi, M. (2020). The Perspective of Indonesian Law on E-Commerce: Validity, Liability, and Dispute Settlement. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n3.a3
Arifin, R., Kambuno, J. A., Waspiah, & Latifiani, D. (2021). Protecting the Consumer Rights in the Digital Economic Era: Future Challenges in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 3(Special Issue), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.9635
Asmorowati, RR. M. (2020). Konsep Kepentingan Umum Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Dihubungkan Dengan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 6(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v6i1.1014
Bunga, D. (2021). Product Reviews by YouTubers: Education or Defamation? Kertha Partika, 43(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2021.v43.i03.p01
Devi, P. C. S., & Putrawan, S. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Yang Melakukan Review Produk Barang Atau Jasa Di Media Sosial. Kertha Semaya, 6(7), 1–14.
Ezekiel, K. (2021). Our Right to Share, Their Right to Know: An Analysis of Public Interest Defense to Defamation. Lentera Hukum, 8(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v8i2.23833
Ferdinal, Y., & Astuti, P. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kebebasan Berpendapat Konsumen Terkait Review Produk Di Media Sosial. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.58126
Fibrianti, N., Santoso, B., Setyowati, R., & Rindyawati, Y. (2023). Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 1267–1310. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69336
Heriyana, I. M., Dewi, A. A. S., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Gugatan Ganti Kerugian dalam Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.1.1989.86-90
Imelda, H. W. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pencemaran Nama Baik Terhadap Konsumen yang Menyampaikan Pendapat di Media Sosial. MOTEKAR: Jurnal Multidisiplin Teknologi Dan Arsitektur, 1(2), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.57235/motekar.v1i2.1243
Jucevicius, R. (2022). Procedural Mechanism For The Implementation Of Public Interest In The Context Of Consumer Rights Protection. Acta Prosperitatis, 13(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-46-62
Mar’Ali, M., & Putri, P. N. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Melakukan Review Suatu Produk di Media Sosial dari Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik. Padjadjaran Law Review, 9(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v9i2.655
Rahma, I. S., Hasiana, E. J., Cantika, S. L., & Octaviona, T. (2022). Indonesian Legal Protection for Consumers on the Validity of Electronic Contracts in the E-Commerce Transactions. Yuridika, 37(3), 697–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.36976
Rosadi, S. D., & Tahira, Z. (2018). Consumer Protection In Digital Economy Era : Law In Indonesia. Yustisia, 7(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.20144
Rotinsulu, J. C. (2021). Insufficient Consumer Protection In E-Commerce Under Indonesian Legal System. Lex et Societas, 9(2), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i2.35133
Schmitz, B. (2022). Rethinking the Public Interest in Consumer Protection. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 9(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10034
Simon, R. (2021). Consumer Protection and Public Interest (L. Tichy & M. Potacs, Eds.). England: Intersentia.
Subagyono, B. S. A., Astutik, S., Chumaida, Z. V., Romadhona, M. K., & Usanti, T. P. (2023). Consumer Dispute In Electronic Transactions: State Obligation And Dispute Settlement Under Indonesia Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1240
Supiyati, S. (2020). Penerapan Pasal 27 Ayat 3 Undang-Undang No 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Internet Sebagai Cybercrime Di Hubungkan Dengan Kebebasan Berekspresi. Pamulang Law Review, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v2i1.5334
Widiarty, W. S., Suwarno, Harjono, Dhaniswara. K., & Susanto, H. (2024). Consumer Protection Laws In Indonesian Commercial Transactions: Safeguarding Business Transactions And Consumer Rights. Journal of Law and Sustainable Develompent, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3099
Widiarty, W. S., & Tehupeiory, A. (2024). The Role Of Business Law In Improving Consumer Protection In The Digital Age. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i2
YLKI. (2017). Ketentuan Pengaduan Ylki.
Zuhairi, A. (2015). Konstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengadu/ Pelapor Kerugian Konsumen Dari Tuntutan Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Pelaku Usaha/Produsen. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v3i7.199
Zulham. (2023). A Critical Review of Consumer Protection Online Shopping, False Advertising, and Legal Protection. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.740
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).