Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews


Evi Kongres(1*), Fajar Sugianto(2), Erny Herlin Setyorini(3), Bariyima Sylvester Kokpan(4), Sheng Zhang(5)

(1) Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pelita Harapan Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
(4) River State University, Nigeria
(5) University of Nottingham Ningbo, China
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Consumers who post negative reviews of products on social media often face defamation claims by business entities. Such lawsuits have had a chilling effect on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by law. In adjudicating consumer cases, judges have generally failed to apply the concept of common interest as a consideration, despite the potential benefits and awareness such reviews provide to prospective consumers. The common interest concept, as stipulated in defamation laws, can serve as a form of legal protection for consumers who post reviews on social media, provided the reviews are truthful, reflect actual conditions, and are made in good faith. By implementing the common interest concept and conducting its proper assessment, legal protection can be ensured for both consumers and businesses. Consumers would be shielded from unwarranted defamation claims, while businesses would be protected from malicious reviews by bad-faith consumers that result in financial or reputational harm. This study aims to dissect the legal safeguard afforded to consumers through the prism of common interest when confronting social media-based complaints or reviews ensnared in defamation litigations instigated by corporate entities. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research amalgamates legislative analysis with conceptual frameworks. The research findings accentuate the significance of invoking the public interest doctrine in consumer-related litigation, thereby fortifying legal defenses against defamation allegations.

Keywords


defamation of character; public interest; social media; video review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustalita, D. H., & Yuherawan, D. S. B. (2023). Makna Kepentingan Umum Pada Kewenangan Deponering Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 160–189. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p160-189

Anand, G., Yudhantaka, L., & Lingkar Katulistiwi, M. (2020). The Perspective of Indonesian Law on E-Commerce: Validity, Liability, and Dispute Settlement. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n3.a3

Arifin, R., Kambuno, J. A., Waspiah, & Latifiani, D. (2021). Protecting the Consumer Rights in the Digital Economic Era: Future Challenges in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 3(Special Issue), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.9635

Asmorowati, RR. M. (2020). Konsep Kepentingan Umum Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Dihubungkan Dengan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 6(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v6i1.1014

Bunga, D. (2021). Product Reviews by YouTubers: Education or Defamation? Kertha Partika, 43(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2021.v43.i03.p01

Devi, P. C. S., & Putrawan, S. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Yang Melakukan Review Produk Barang Atau Jasa Di Media Sosial. Kertha Semaya, 6(7), 1–14.

Ezekiel, K. (2021). Our Right to Share, Their Right to Know: An Analysis of Public Interest Defense to Defamation. Lentera Hukum, 8(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v8i2.23833

Ferdinal, Y., & Astuti, P. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kebebasan Berpendapat Konsumen Terkait Review Produk Di Media Sosial. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.58126

Fibrianti, N., Santoso, B., Setyowati, R., & Rindyawati, Y. (2023). Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness of Consumers: The Influence on Regulation and Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 1267–1310. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69336

Heriyana, I. M., Dewi, A. A. S., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Gugatan Ganti Kerugian dalam Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.1.1989.86-90

Imelda, H. W. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pencemaran Nama Baik Terhadap Konsumen yang Menyampaikan Pendapat di Media Sosial. MOTEKAR: Jurnal Multidisiplin Teknologi Dan Arsitektur, 1(2), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.57235/motekar.v1i2.1243

Jucevicius, R. (2022). Procedural Mechanism For The Implementation Of Public Interest In The Context Of Consumer Rights Protection. Acta Prosperitatis, 13(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37804/1691-6077-2022-13-46-62

Mar’Ali, M., & Putri, P. N. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Melakukan Review Suatu Produk di Media Sosial dari Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik. Padjadjaran Law Review, 9(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v9i2.655

Rahma, I. S., Hasiana, E. J., Cantika, S. L., & Octaviona, T. (2022). Indonesian Legal Protection for Consumers on the Validity of Electronic Contracts in the E-Commerce Transactions. Yuridika, 37(3), 697–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.36976

Rosadi, S. D., & Tahira, Z. (2018). Consumer Protection In Digital Economy Era : Law In Indonesia. Yustisia, 7(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.20144

Rotinsulu, J. C. (2021). Insufficient Consumer Protection In E-Commerce Under Indonesian Legal System. Lex et Societas, 9(2), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i2.35133

Schmitz, B. (2022). Rethinking the Public Interest in Consumer Protection. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 9(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10034

Simon, R. (2021). Consumer Protection and Public Interest (L. Tichy & M. Potacs, Eds.). England: Intersentia.

Subagyono, B. S. A., Astutik, S., Chumaida, Z. V., Romadhona, M. K., & Usanti, T. P. (2023). Consumer Dispute In Electronic Transactions: State Obligation And Dispute Settlement Under Indonesia Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1240

Supiyati, S. (2020). Penerapan Pasal 27 Ayat 3 Undang-Undang No 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Internet Sebagai Cybercrime Di Hubungkan Dengan Kebebasan Berekspresi. Pamulang Law Review, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v2i1.5334

Widiarty, W. S., Suwarno, Harjono, Dhaniswara. K., & Susanto, H. (2024). Consumer Protection Laws In Indonesian Commercial Transactions: Safeguarding Business Transactions And Consumer Rights. Journal of Law and Sustainable Develompent, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3099

Widiarty, W. S., & Tehupeiory, A. (2024). The Role Of Business Law In Improving Consumer Protection In The Digital Age. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i2

YLKI. (2017). Ketentuan Pengaduan Ylki.

Zuhairi, A. (2015). Konstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengadu/ Pelapor Kerugian Konsumen Dari Tuntutan Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Pelaku Usaha/Produsen. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v3i7.199

Zulham. (2023). A Critical Review of Consumer Protection Online Shopping, False Advertising, and Legal Protection. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.740




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i3.35508

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Evi Kongres et.al

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International