Reevaluating the Formal Requirements of Wills: Advocating for the Integration of Electronic Wills


Lilian Ifeoma Nwabueze(1), Peter Ikechukwu Gasiokwu(2*)

(1) Faculty of Law, University of Delta, Agbor, Nigeria,  
(2) Faculty of Law, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, Nigeria, Nigeria
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper aims to examine the nature and purpose of the formal requirements of Wills, highlighting their limitations and the need for adaptation in the context of modern electronic communication. The doctrinal research method was employed to evaluate legal problems and analyse the current statutory framework governing Wills. The study found that the traditional formal requirements for Wills, intended to provide testamentary protection and serve as legal proof of execution, often fail to meet their purpose effectively. Judicial and judicious applications of these rules have revealed significant limitations. There is an urgent need for the law to adapt to technological advancements by incorporating electronic Wills. This adaptation would address the inadequacies of current formal requirements and ensure the effectiveness of testamentary dispositions as evidenced in its use in South Africa by all categories of persons- with or without legal knowledge; in the United States of America for exigencies and in Australia to ensure high level of confidentiality and secrecy. The paper recommends articulated formalities supported by electronic communication to achieve testamentary goals. It suggests amendments to the extant laws on Wills in jurisdictions where provisions for dispensing powers are missing while detailed and applicable electronic Will legislation is recommended for jurisdictions that have long recognized the need for testamentary disposition to join the global advancement in technology.

Keywords


Electronic Wills, Formal Requirements, Testamentary Protection, Wills.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abayomi, K. (2004). Wills: Law and Practice. Mbeyi and Associates (Nig.) Ltd.

Akeredolu, O. (2019). Probate practice gets a second look. In NBA SLP Conference, Akure.

Animashaun, T. O. G., & Oyeneyi, A. B. (2002). Law of Succession: Wills and Probate in Nigeria. MIJ Professional Publishers.

Beyer, G. W. (1983). Videotaping the Will Execution Ceremony-Preventing Frustration of Testator’s Final Wishes. Boston College Law Review.

Beyer, G. W., & Peters, K. V. (2019). Signs on the [Electronic] Dotted Lines: The Rise of the Electronic Wills. Texas Tech University School of Law.

Claiborne, R. (1974). The Birth of Writing in the Emergency of Man. Time Life International.

Claiborne, R. (1977). The Birth of Writing in the Emergency of Man. Time-Life Books.

Ellart, C. S. (2014). The Late Roman Law of Inheritance: The Testament of Five or Seven Witnesses. In B. Caseall & S. R. Haebner (Eds.), Inheritance, Law and Religion in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds (p. 229). Association des amis dis Centre d’histoire et Civilisation de Byzance.

Gulliver, A., & Tilson, C. (1941). CLASSIFICATION OF GRATUITOUS TRANSFERS. Yale Law Journal, 51.

Hacker, D. (2010). Soulless Wills. Law & Social Inquiry, 35(4), 957-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01210.x

Hirsh, A. J. (2020). Technology Adrift: In Search of a Role for Electronic Wills. Boston College Law Review, 61(3), 830.

Holdsworth, W. S. (1973). A History of English Law (5th ed.; 2nd impression).

Hornby, A. S. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Horton, D. (2017). Tomorrow’s Inheritance: The Frontiers of Estate Planning Formalism. Boston College Law Review, 58(2), 539.

Horton, D. (2019). Wills Without Signatures. Boston University Law Review, 99.

Kerridge, R., & Parry, D. (2009). The Law of Succession (2nd ed.). Sweet and Maxwell.

Kimberley, M. (2020). Technology and Wills: The Dawn of a New Era Covid 19 Special Edition. Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.step.org/system/files/media/files/2020-08/Technology-and-Wills_The-Dawn-of-a-New-Era.pdf

Langbein, J. (1990). Abolishing the Attestation Requirement for Wills. North Carolina Law Review, 68.

Maine, H. S. (1884). Ancient Law (10th ed.).

Mann, B. H. (1985). Self-Proving Affidavits and Formalism in Wills Adjudication. Washington University Law Quarterly, 65.

Martin, K. (2020). TECHNOLOGY AND WILLS -THE DAWN OF A NEW ERA ____ COVID-19 special edition. UK: Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Retrieved from Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners website: https://www.step.org/system/files/media/files/2020-08/Technology-and-Wills_The-Dawn-of-a-New-Era.pdf

Na- Crous. (2019). A Comparative Study f the Legal Status of Electronic Will. Unpublished LLM Minidissertation, North West University South Africa.

Nelson, C., & Starck, J. (2013). Formalities and Formalism: A Critical Look at the Execution of Wills. Pepperdine Law Review, 6(2), 331.

Papadopoulos, S. (2012). Electronic Wills with an Aura of Authenticity: Van Der Merwe v. The Master of the High Court & Anor. SA Mere Law Journal, 24.

Sagay, I. E. (2006). Nigerian Law of Succession: Principles, Cases, Statutes, and Commentaries. Malthouse Press Ltd.

Storrow, R. (2022). Legacies of a Pandemic: Remote Attestation and Electronic Wills. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 48(4), 852.

Wahbi, M. & Batter. (2020). E- WILLS-LEGISLATIVE CHANGE- A NECESSITY IN THE COVID-19 CRISIS. Retrieved from

Weisbord, R. K. (2012). Wills for Everyone: Helping Individuals Opt Out of Intestacy. Boston College Law Review.

CASES:

Allen v. Dalk, [2002] 4 WLR 300.

Amutsaghan Dafioka & Anor v. Couple Edede & 5 Ors, [1968] 1 All NLR 290.

Amadi v. Amadi (2017) 7NWLR (Pt. 1563) 108.

Appeal of Knox, [n.d.] 2 Ch App 111.

Beali v. Cunningham, [1843] 5 Beav 116.

Brown v. Fluharty, [2013] 2 WLR 674.

Brown’s Ex’r v. Tilden, [1822] 1 Add 44.

Cole v. Mordaunt, [1926] 1 Ch 279.

Deeks v. Greenwood, [2011] 2 WLR 1012.

Ezenwere v. Ezenwere, [2003] 2 NWLR 108.

Estate of Dellinger v. 1st Source of Bank, [2003] 1 WLR 403.

Estate of Javier Castro (2013) ES00140. Ohio Ct. Com. Pl.

Estate of McCabe, [1990] 1 WLR 137.

Fincham v. Edwards, [1842] 1 QB 44.

Glenn v. Mann, [1975] 2 WLR 569.

George v. George, [1964] 1 All ER 94.

Groffman v. Groffman, [1969] 1 WLR 733.

Hamlet v. Hamlet, [1945] 2 All ER 121.

Huffman v. Huffman, [1964] 1 WLR 899.

In Buckley v. Holstedt (1983) WY122, 672 P. 2d. 829.

In matter of Estate of Cunningham, [1980] 1 WLR 813.

In re Estate of Brewer, [2015] 2 WLR 1048.

In re Estate of Chastain, [2012] 3 WLR 977.

In re Matle’s Will, [1892] P 169.

In re Proley’s Estate, [1980] 1 WLR 805.

In re Succession of Caillouet, [1890] 1 WLR 732.

In re Will of Bradway, [2018] 3 WLR 1289.

In re Wilkins Estate, [1939] 2 All ER 237.

In Re Estate of Javier Castro, [2013] 4 WLR 1021.

In Re Estate of Horton (2018) 925 N. W. 2d.

Instiful v. Christian, [1951] 1 All ER 110.

Murphy v. Martius, [1933] 2 KB 132.

Okesola v. Boyle, [1998] 2 NWLR 423.

Philips v. Najar, [1995] 2 WLR 823.

Plater v. Groome, [1852] 1 De G M & G 944.

Quimby v. Greenhawk, [1934] 2 KB 527.

Reed v. Woodward, [1875] LR 20 Eq 57.

Rioux Coulombe (1996) 19 ETR (2d) 201

Re:Yu (2013) QSC 322.

Savage v. Bowen, [1905] 1 Ch 325.

Simonelli v. Chiarolanza, [2002] 3 WLR 1248.

Taylor v, Holt (2003) 134 S W. 3 d. 830. (Tenn,)

Warwick v. Warwick, [1890] 15 PD 69.

Watts v. Pub. Admir, [1829] 1 Hagg Ecc 94.

Westmoreland v. Tallent, [2001] 1 WLR 938.

Whitecare v. Crowe, [2012] 2 WLR 585.

Yazbek v. Yazbek . (2012) NSWSC 594.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i2.35933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Lilian Ifeoma Nwabueze and Peter Ikechukwu Gasiokwu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Raya A.H. Nasution No. 105 Cibiru Kota Bandung, 40614

E-mail: KHukum@uinsgd.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons

Khazanah Hukum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International