Reforming Ukraine's Pre-Trial Custody Measures: An International Law Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.37796Keywords:
custody, preventive measures, criminal law, drug trafficking, criminal proceedingsAbstract
This study examines how Ukraine's pre-trial custody measures can align with European Union standards, with a particular focus on addressing drug trafficking cases. By analysing theoretical, legislative, and practical aspects of pre-trial custody in serious and extremely serious drug-related crimes, the article identifies gaps in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and proposes specific reforms. The research emphasizes the international law perspective, referencing EU legal frameworks such as the European Convention on Human Rights and United Nations guidelines on pre-trial detention. Through an analysis of patterns in applying preventive measures and their impact on human rights, the study highlights the need for reforms that balance public safety and individual freedoms. Proposed reforms, including clearer criteria for applying custody, stricter regulations on alternative measures, and enhanced procedural safeguards, aim to ensure compliance with EU human rights standards while maintaining public safety. These changes are expected to improve procedural fairness, reduce arbitrariness in detention practices, and foster greater trust in Ukraine's judicial system. By addressing these issues, the reforms not only strengthen the rule of law domestically but also accelerate Ukraine’s integration into the European legal and governance framework.
References
Ablamskyi, S.Ye. (2015a). Evaluation concepts in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of 2012: Theoretical and problems of application. In Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Legal Science and practice: Challenges of modern Eurointegration processes” (Bratislava, 27-28 November 2015) (pp. 19-22). Bratislava: Pan-European University. Retrieved from https://univd.edu.ua/science-issue/issue/1689
Ablamskyi, S.Ye. (2015b). Protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the victim in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: Panov.
Alschuler, A. (2003). The changing purposes of criminal punishment: A retrospective on the past century and some thoughts about the next. University of Chicago Law Review, 70(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600541
Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2019). The criminal process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austrian Criminal Procedural Code 2014. (2014). Retrieved from https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/aut/1974/austrian-criminal-procedural-code-2014_html/Austria_Criminal_Procedure_Law_GER_2014.pdf
Bail Act. (1976). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/63
Bail Reform Act of 1984 (2d ed.). (1993). https://www.rip.uscourts.gov/sites/rip/files/bailreformact.pdf
Bandurka, O.M., Blazhivskyi, Ye.M., & Burdol, Ye.P. (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary. Vol. 1. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Bondarenko, O., Reznik, O., & Utkina, M. (2022). Novelization of the criminal code of Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion. Journal of International Legal Communication, 4(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2022.1.pp.31-38
Case United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739. (1987). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/481/739/
Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO). (1975). Retrieved from https://www.buzer.de/StPO.htm
Constitution of Ukraine. (1996). https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG
Council of Europe. (2006). Recommendation Rec(2006)13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the use of remand in custody, the conditions in which it takes place and the provision of safeguards against abuse. Retrieved from https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/41781569/42171329/CMRec+%282006%29+13+on+the+use+of+remand+in+custody%2C+the+conditions+in+which+it+takes+place+and+the+provision+of+safeguard+against+abuse.pdf/ccde55db-7aa4-4e11-90ba-38e4467efd7b
Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text
Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2012). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
Dal, A.L., & Ablamskyi, S.Ye. (2017). Custody as a preventive measure in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
Decision of Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 2-rp/2016 of 01 June 2016 in the case of the constitutional complaint of the Commissioner of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for Human Rights regarding compliance of the provision of the third sentence of Part 1 of Article 13 of the Law of Ukraine “On Psychiatric Care” with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) (case on judicial control over
the hospitalization of incapacitated persons in a psychiatric institution). (2016). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-16#Text
Decision of Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 3-rp/2003 of 30 January 2003 in the case on the constitutional complaint to the Supreme Court of Ukraine on compliance of the provisions of Part 3 of Article 120, part six of Article 234, Part 3 of Article 236 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) (the case of the court's consideration of certain decisions of the investigator and prosecutor). (2003). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-03#Text
Decision of Constitutional Court of Ukraine No. 7-r/2019 of 25 June 2019 in the case of the constitutional complaints of Maryna Anatoliivna Kovtun, Nadiia Viktorivna Savchenko, Ihor Dmytrovych Kostoglodov, Valeryi Ivanovich Chornobuk regarding the compliance of the provisions of Part 5 of Article 176 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality). (2019). Retrieved from https://ccu.gov.ua/dokument/7-r2019
European Court of Human Rights. (2022). Guide on Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to liberty and security. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/guide_art_5_eng
Hwang, Y.I.J., Simpson, P.L., & Butler, T.G. (2021). Participant experiences of a post-release electronic monitoring program for domestic violence in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 482-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076211028729
Janis, M.W., Kay, R.S., & Bradley, A.W. (2008). European human rights law: Text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Judgment in case of I.A. v. France, Application no. 1/1998/904/1116, of 23 September 1998. (1998). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr?i=001-58237
Judgment in case of Kharchenko v. Ukraine, Application no. 40107/02, of 10 February 2011. (2011). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-103260
Judgment in case of Khayredinov v. Ukraine, Application no. 38717/04, of 14 October 2010. (2010). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100958
Judgment in case of Korniychuk v. Ukraine, Application no. 10042/11, of 30 April 2018. (2018). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-180498
Judgment in case of Letellier v. France, Application no. 12369/86, of 26 June 1991. (1991). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57678
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ganna Sobko et.al
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).